Well, I just pulled that "30 miles away" thing out of my ass in order to show that it could be far away. It wasn't an actual guess.Originally posted by neon_duke
I do believe these pictures are real, but I doon't believe they are Isabel or any other hurricane. On the first one, the scale of the clouds is all wrong for it to be 30 miles away, and even if it was, 30 miles is nothing in the ocean. The seas would be far rougher than they are showing. Plus, you can see the shadow of the cloud front on the water. That storm is less than a mile away, and much more localized than a hurricane - just a squall. That's why the seas haven't kicked up yet.
The second one could possibly be from Isabel, but waterspouts are just like tornados. They don't usually spawn during a hurricane because the overal organizing force of the hurricane prevents anything that local from forming before it is swept apart by the bigger storm.
Originally posted by Jpec07
Um, the Hurricane is probably about 50-200 miles away when these pics are taken. (I mean, look at the distance between the bottom and the arms; that distance measures nearly 5 miles...).
Originally posted by Giancarlo
The first one is totally fake. If there's a hurricane in the ocean, why are the waters 20 feet away from it so calm?
lol, not an 'actual' guess?Originally posted by Timmotheus
Well, I just pulled that "30 miles away" thing out of my ass in order to show that it could be far away. It wasn't an actual guess.
did anybody bother to click the link there?Originally posted by Attila_Da_Hun
Those are not from the hurrican.
Meteorologists (including Dr. Steve Lyons, the Weather Channel's hurricane expert) agree that the photos displayed above are not pictures of any hurricane at all, much less Hurricane Isabel, which struck the eastern United States in September 2003 they depict shelf clouds or wall clouds typically associated with severe thunderstorms and tornadoes rather than hurricanes, and the water in the first picture appears too smooth for the area of an approaching hurricane. (Even if these images did depict the approach of a hurricane, they're too old to be photographs of Hurricane Isabel these same pictures were circulating as photographs of Hurricane Claudette back in July 2003 and of Cyclone Indigo in April 2003.)
Some believe the photographs to have been taken in the midwestern U.S. or Great Lakes region, although at least one source identifies the first image as being a picture of Tropical Cyclone Graham, which hit northwest Australia in February 2003.
i think the bigger the ship the more easily it can handle choppy seas. think how much a rubber duck rolls around in a bath and how much you do in comparison. bigger weights are harder to move. of course there is a limit. the hull of a tanker can be breached just like any other ship and due to its inflexibility im guessing it needs to be stronger than a regular ship. though im no expertOriginally posted by Frustrated Palm
Well, most ships can take it. A tanker though you have to think about. They are the longest ships in the world, in cant handle really big choppy seas...