McLaren in GT4: Welcome to the Party or Uninvited?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JohnBM01
  • 483 comments
  • 19,461 views
JAGUAR
Finally didn't we already go over the restrictor issue before. The restrictor size is a guesstimate, to allow each car to produce 500BHP with 10-15% leeway.
Yes, but we never came to an agreement over the GT500, yes there are plenty of series that only give a rough idea of the power but in the official US site it says 500BHP MAX, in the translated Japanese version it says aproximately 500Bhp, that doesn'ty contradict the US site, it's just not as specific. Wern't you waiting for a reply e-mail to clear this up, becaue if your right fair enough but as I said before I'm sticking with what the US site says for now.
 
Mclaren did not go under. The F1 came to the end of its production life just as Mclaren switched their alliegence in F1 to Mercedes. The Mclaren Mercedes was designed by the F1 designer, Gorden Murray, and Mercedes Benz. It is built on the same production line as the F1 road car.

A new Mclaren Mercedes is apprently being considered for production. It will be more of an out and out supercar, challenging the likes of the 360 and Gallardo.

p8benz_bigfront.jpg


"The SLR was just the first shot: Mercedes-Benz and McLaren are beyond planning stages for a mid-engine, V8-powered supercar with sights set on Ferrari’s 360 Modena and Ford’s GT. The project car—though only in its formative stage—has a dedicated group looking into its engineering, manufacturing, sales and marketing feasibility, and is codenamed P8. If given approval in the coming months, P8, which would slot between the robust SL65 AMG and the SLR McLaren, could be on the streets testing by late 2006 and in showrooms by late 2007

The P8, depicted here as an artist’s rendering, is officially only a concept. Clearly, management from both Mercedes-Benz and the McLaren Formula One super team would like to put a car like P8 into production. “Yes, we are looking at a mid-engine road car,” Mercedes boss Jürgen Hubbert told AutoWeek last week. “But there is no decision on production.” Before production can happen, M-B and McLaren board members must give P8 unanimous approval. What gives credence to the likelihood of P8 seeing production? News that ultra-performance car guru Neil Hannemann, the engineering mind behind the Dodge Viper, Saleen S7 and the Ford GT, left the friendly confines of Ford in Dearborn Jan. 31 for a job as engineering director at McLaren. P8 also makes smart business sense. The SLR is built in the new McLaren Technology Center in Woking, England, a reported $300 million investment already made by both Mercedes and McLaren. Only by expanding the model product lines of this collaborative effort can that investment be amortized.

There is also ego at stake—M-B and McLaren compete with Ferrari in Formula One on racetracks around the world and want to take on the Italians in the performance street car arena. Perhaps another spur in the side to do this car is knowledge that rival Audi is at an advanced stage with its own mid-engine supercar, the Le Mans, using the Lamborghini Gallardo underpinnings (AW, Feb. 16). Though many specifics of the program remain speculation, some of what we know about the direction of both Mercedes and McLaren opens a window on what such a sports car could be like. Why mid-engine? “If you see the competition in the segment, they are only mid-engine,” says Hubbert. “In McLaren and especially (McLaren’s) Gordon Murray, we have vast experience with mid-engine cars.” Hubbert stressed the Mercedes supercar bears no relationship to the mid-engine ME Four-Twelve concept shown by Chrysler at Detroit. Mercedes engine-tuner AMG merely provided the 850-hp quad-turbo V12 for that concept, which Hubbert doubts will see production.

The high-tech SLR, with its 0-to-60-mph time of 3.7 seconds and 204-mph top speed, has proven both companies can compete in the supercar arena. However, this new mid-engine contender is a tougher assignment, not least because it must be built to a tighter budget and with an eye toward larger sales volumes than the targeted 500 annual build rate of SLR. This is not the first mid-engine road car Mercedes-Benz has considered. The striking C112 concept back in 1991 nearly made it to showrooms but was abandoned due to a downturn in the world’s economy. Also, the company’s CLK GTR was built in small numbers in 1998 to satisfy the FIA’s sports car regulations, though it was very much a race car modified for road use. In McLaren, Mercedes-Benz has a partner that knows well how to apply mid-engine design to road performance. The firm’s celebrated F1 road car may be a decade old, but few would argue it still ranks as the most accomplished supercar ever placed into production. These illustrations reveal how the baby M-B McLaren supercar could look, though wind-tunnel testing will undoubtedly change the package by the time it appears. Chances are a convertible will get the nod, insiders say.

It is reasonable to think P8 will use the same lightweight carbon fiber monocoque construction as the SLR, and incorporate features such as Mercedes’ Pre-Safe early warning system that triggers safety systems in the event of an impending crash. Engineers are striving to keep weight to 3000 pounds, or close to that of the 360 Modena and Gallardo. “Anything lower would be utopian, given the stringent crash standards the new car will need to adhere to, both in Europe and the U.S.,” said an AutoWeek source. The ME Four-Twelve beat this weight target with similar equipment and a bigger engine but no price target. Expect serious attention to weight distribution to maximize handling, with 42 percent front and 58 percent rear weight bias the likely target. We know Mercedes and Michelin are developing a two-compound tire that could make it to P8. Given M-B’s penchant for high-tech gadgets, the P8 is likely to employ the latest in electronic driver aids, too. AutoWeek can reveal top-secret details about the P8’s powerplant. Codenamed M156, it is an all-new normally aspirated 6.3-liter V8 that is also destined to power future AMG versions of the E-, CLS-, S-, CL- and SL-Class cars. The aluminum-block unit is based on Mercedes’ M273-designated four-valve-per-cylinder V8 due out next year, an engine that develops a reliable 500 hp on the engine dyno, say highly placed sources. A twin-turbocharged version that churns out a mammoth 700 hp is in early development, though that mill has not yet received the production green light. The M156 is being developed under AMG engine boss Rolf Zimmermann, who is the mastermind behind the 367-hp normally aspirated and 500-hp supercharged 5.4-liter V8 powerplants in AMG models now. Zimmermann also developed the 555-hp 7.3-liter V12 engine that powers the Pagani Zonda S. Mystery still surrounds the gearbox choice for the new car. All of Mercedes’ recent performance cars—SLR included—get a beefed-up automatic transmission that runs the company’s so-called Speedshift electronics, which make for quicker gear changes.

Sources tell AutoWeek the most likely scenario is a reworked version of the new Mercedes 7G-Tronic unit. With torque converter lock-up on each of its seven forward gears, and electronics that allow it to skip ratios on kickdown, it could turn the monster output into scintillating performance—though without the tactile feel of a manual like those in the 360 Modena and Ford GT. The torque limit for this gearbox is well within what the V8 engine could produce. As the car still awaits a production green flag, there is no firm on-sale date for P8. Still, insiders hint 2008-model-year examples will hit the road by the end of 2007—or just 46 months from now. We are told the business case for a mid-engine supercar centers on annual global sales of 800, which seems low; in fact, flexible assembly methods can allow production to increase to around 1500 a year if necessary. And the price? Positioned between the SL65 AMG and the SLR, industry analysts predict a price tag for the two-seater of around $200,000—a slight premium over the current 360 Modena and a healthy $60,000 more than the $140,000 Ford GT. Still, that is a fraction of the $1.2 million a used McLaren F1 will cost now." -Autoweek

the two things im not liking are the 7 speed auto and the "cutting edge" electronics. hopefully theyll keep the weight down this time.
 
And which magazine did you get that from?

But, there is a reason as to why McLaren built the GTs, making that the 3 made equalled in 100 cars.
 
live4speed
Yes, but we never came to an agreement over the GT500, yes there are plenty of series that only give a rough idea of the power but in the official US site it says 500BHP MAX, in the translated Japanese version it says aproximately 500Bhp, that doesn'ty contradict the US site, it's just not as specific. Wern't you waiting for a reply e-mail to clear this up, becaue if your right fair enough but as I said before I'm sticking with what the US site says for now.


We're getting bogged down in semantics. Your right, the limit is 500BHP MAX, and the way they regulate this is by fitting a restrictor. My point is the restrictors cannot be 100% accurate, particulalry with so many engine specifications. With development it is also possible to extract 'slightly' more power through efficiency gains etc, as has happened in the WRC over the last 10 years.
 
Road & Track did an article on it. The said in one of their issues, that it may be scraped. It doesn't mean it's going into production. The car is still concept. And as we all know, manufacturers don't always put the concepts into production. Usually, if the visitors at auto shows like it, then they can consider it.
 
JAGUAR
We're getting bogged down in semantics. Your right, the limit is 500BHP MAX, and the way they regulate this is by fitting a restrictor. My point is the restrictors cannot be 100% accurate, particulalry with so many engine specifications. With development it is also possible to extract 'slightly' more power through efficiency gains etc, as has happened in the WRC over the last 10 years.
Fair enough, I'd still like to know if you get a reply to that e-mail but we should get back to discussing the F1 in GT4 topic :).
 
...i only hope the F1 short tail makes it into GT4!:)it should be included!
it´s a nice car not as impressive as it´s big brother(long tail)but also one of the first GT1 cars(together with the F40,EB 110 and Atlantique!)!
....so PD if u can read this in A-N-Y-W-A-Y:
PLEASEEEE PUT IN THE F1 SHORT TAIL AND THE ROAD VERSION OF THE LONG AND THE SHORT VERSION!!! :) :dopey:
 

Attachments

  • Gulf Mc Laren F1 GTR-3.jpg
    Gulf Mc Laren F1 GTR-3.jpg
    44.3 KB · Views: 13
  • Mc Laren F1 GTR-1.jpg
    Mc Laren F1 GTR-1.jpg
    88.7 KB · Views: 13
  • Mc Laren F1 GTR-5.jpg
    Mc Laren F1 GTR-5.jpg
    65.4 KB · Views: 12
  • short Mc Laren F1 GTR-2.jpg
    short Mc Laren F1 GTR-2.jpg
    85.6 KB · Views: 11
To the F1 topic, there is a particular reason why the F1 GT car has never been in any racing game.

There is something about this car that McLaren Cars Lmt. did not allow even EA to use.
f1gt3.jpg

IT is a shame that there less than 20 pics that are common on most sites.
It is the rarest McLaren in the world.
Also, McLaren Cars Lmt. also did not allow this particular McLaren in EA. So EA got the F1 and F1 LM, MCLmt. refused to let them take this car.
 
GT-One Lover
...i only hope the F1 short tail makes it into GT4!:)it should be included!
it´s a nice car not as impressive as it´s big brother(long tail)but also one of the first GT1 cars(together with the F40,EB 110 and Atlantique!)!
....so PD if u can read this in A-N-Y-W-A-Y:
PLEASEEEE PUT IN THE F1 SHORT TAIL AND THE ROAD VERSION OF THE LONG AND THE SHORT VERSION!!! :) :dopey:

BMW has the rights to #43 and #42 Fina McLarens. All other like the Gulf, are owned by McLaren and other companies.
 
I'm not a mclaren fanatic (what am I saying I love the things!) but is the GT the road version of the longtail GTone Lover mentioned? By the way nice pic Mclaren F1GTR
 
xcsti
I'm not a mclaren fanatic (what am I saying I love the things!) but is the GT the road version of the longtail GTone Lover mentioned? By the way nice pic Mclaren F1GTR
In fact, the GT is the road version. You can notice the long end. Like I said, for some reason, McLaren has never let anyone use this car. PD couldn't test anyway though. The F1 GT is very hard to acquire.
 
It's only a matter of asking McLaren how much. Just because EA has never had it doesn't mean they have wanted it, it's a rare McLaren that few know of, as a result it's not really in EA's interests to spend loads on the license when few will appreciate it since NFS is an arcade game, GT is a car fanatics game that non-fanatics can also enjoy.
 
...but why???...what is so bad about bringin this fantastic-lookin road beast in a veyr famous game??...don´t understand....the Mc Laren´s time is over,too so why this "don´t letting the road car in any game"???
 
LIke live said, very few have heard of it. Besides, you know how PD does the testing with cars. PD would have to go McLaren, spend the money to get it, then find a GT on earth. PD simply doesn't have the time to search the globe for a car of which only 3 were made.
 
....whaaa!!:(:(:(cryyyyy
...but can´t they simply paint the raceversion of GT4P black and just left the rear wing out??
why so complicate?...u don´t need to search the whole globe....
 
I don't think they would get to test that, they don't test every car that appears in the game, they let the game engine work out most of how a car should handle and tweak it, and I guess they would use that for a car like the F1 GT. Thers a much higher chance of it appearing in a GT game if PD had access to the McLaren license but it's one of thoes things PD wil have to weigh up, will the cost be too high for one car that not many people will fully appreciate.
 
live4speed
I don't think they would get to test that, they don't test every car that appears in the game, they let the game engine work out most of how a car should handle and tweak it, and I guess they would use that for a car like the F1 GT. Thers a much higher chance of it appearing in a GT game if PD had access to the McLaren license but it's one of thoes things PD wil have to weigh up, will the cost be too high for one car that not many people will fully appreciate.

Exactly. And changing the car, if McLaren ever got their hands on GT4, and saw that it was called F1 GT, forget GT5. PD would be issuing a car, that it did not have the license to use, and the name goes with it. LIke in Burnout 2, you see a Viper, but it's not called one.
 
That's the simple solution for arcade games. Keep the overall styling of the car, change subtle details, omit the name and license, and you've got yourself a free car. Tokyo extreme racer did one better, by refering to the exact duplicate models by their engine codes. Makes licensing a whole lot simpler.
 
kinigitt
That's the simple solution for arcade games. Keep the overall styling of the car, change subtle details, omit the name and license, and you've got yourself a free car. Tokyo extreme racer did one better, by refering to the exact duplicate models by their engine codes. Makes licensing a whole lot simpler.


Yes, Burnout 2 did that with alot of their cars. The Viper, the McLaren, and a Lotus in the 1st one. But like I said, if PD changed the car to look like the GT and then recalled F1 GT, and put it under BMw, they would be in trouble for false licenseing not only by McLaren, but BMW as well. Remember, the only relationship is that BMW powers every McLaren car with the V12.
 
xcsti
They could do that, I don't think I would mind it that much, makes the game seem a bit cheeper thou.
But PD thinks of itself had getting real cars, not calling it something it isn't. Besides, the only McLaren Road car anyone has a chance of seeing GT5 in the F1.
The F1 LM is rarer by 59 cars, and the F1 GT is rarer by 61 cars.

On another note...
The '95 McLaren F1 GTR feature a 640Bhp.
The '96 F1 GTR however was forced by LeMans Officials down to 600Bhp.

And even worse, when the F1 GTR featured in JGTC, they forced McLaren down to 500HP. However, the Longtail racing in LeMans stuck to the 600Bhp.
The F1 GTR "short tail" was built for customers who wanted to race the F1.

The only difference between the Short Tail and the Longtail besides bodystyle was the '97 Longtail was reduced weight even further, a new sequential gearbox, and aerodynamic change (The bodystyle) that helped it go even faster.
The top speed for a F1 GTR, F1 GT, and F1 LM are unknown.
 
Eagle
I don't know how much you could represent McLaren though. If they're in the history mode that's different. But car wise? We have the McLaren F1, the F1 GTR, the F1 LM, what else? What else would be included?

didn't they make a car called an m6?...not a BMW but a mclaren...it was something 6
 
Mclaren has made lots of race cars but I am 99% sure there was not other road car other than the F1 and it's varients. and Mclaren F1GTR, I remember seeing a chart comparing acceleration between the LM and normal F1. The LM has shorter gear ratios and a bit more power so it schooled the regular F1. I think I remember them listing the LM' top speed as ~220MPH. I'll look for the site.
 
Back