Michael Jackson verdict has been made

  • Thread starter Thread starter smellysocks12
  • 88 comments
  • 2,651 views
danoff
By the way, Culkin was not going to claim that Jackson molested him - he has everything to lose by saying that. His career would be over in an instant.

Macauly Culkin has a career? :sly:

The fact is you've got a woman who has filed frivalous lawsuits before, she knew of the abuse and allowed him to still go to sleep with Michael, she has major credibility issues. Which translate into coaching of her son. In criminal (and civil cases) where there aren't any witnesses it comes down to credibility.

Michael says he loves kids, shares his bed with them, etc. but never molested anyone. Did the incidents which he was acquitted occur? Probably, he's a very strange man. But the $1,000,000 question is: Is there any reasonable chance it didn't, and they're just trying to get money? Jury felt so, and I based on what I know about the case, I have to agree, there is a chance that it never occured. Defense attorneys don't need to demonstrate Michael did not commit the crime, they just need to raise doubt that he did. It's up to the prosecution to show that he did in fact commit the crime.

What was the prosecution's case? Shaky/flip-flopping witness testimony about Jacko giving kids wine in Coke cans, Michael showed them child pornography on his computer, and the testimony of a 13-year old boy and his brother. The defense moved to have the charges dropped because the prosecution hadn't proved their case after they rested (motion denied), the defense brought a bunch of witnesses who had slept in Michael's bed and hadn't been molested (Major Logic flaw: he didn't molest everyone, therefore didn't molest this boy?) and attacked the credibility of the witnesses in this case. Obviously, they were able to raise doubts.

As I said before, it'd be a shame if Jacko got off because of mistakes in past by the accuser's family that amount to crying wolf too many times. On the other hand, it's terrible to destroy someone who has reached out and helped you in your time of need's reputation and career to get to his piggybank.

But is Jackson really a menace to society? Will he ever do this again(If he in fact did it this time)? Would anyone let their child share a bed with him?
 
But is Jackson really a menace to society? Will he ever do this again(If he in fact did it this time)? Would anyone let their child share a bed with him?

Quite possibly, and quite possibly on purpose.

The people who declared him to be not guilty obviously had a more in-depth view on this case than you did, so until he's convicted for these types of crimes you shouldn't be assuming anything different.

If I were on the jury I would weigh the facts and consider the law... but I'm not so I get to guess at what happened - and I guess it happened. The jurors probably think there was a good chance it happened too. Bottom line, it probably happened (at least with a few kids even if not this one). So I'm going to go on assuming that he's guilty.

OJ is guilty too by the way, even though he was acquitted also.
 
:rolleyes: Oh great... I heard from the news or that stupid ass ET that MJ was planning a Reality show based around him. :irked: I hope your ass stays broke.
 
VIPFREAK
:rolleyes: Oh great... I heard from the news or that stupid ass ET that MJ was planning a Reality show based around him. :irked: I hope your ass stays broke.
He's still worth about 200-220 million dollars. But he has borrowed against his Beatles collection, which is worth 450-500 million. That means he's in debt for around 285 million or so, but he's not broke.
 
Damn! Beatles songs are worth that much? Paul McCartney should buy some of them back. He's probably worth over billion by now. If they are still friends, maybe something can be worked out.
 
a6m5
Damn! Beatles songs are worth that much? Paul McCartney should buy some of them back. He's probably worth over billion by now. If they are still friends, maybe something can be worked out.

Well, as Paul MacCartney once sang, "We Can Work It Out"... :ouch:
 
Touring Mars
Well, as Paul MacCartney once sang, "We Can Work It Out"... :ouch:
I love that song! Then again, I love 99% of their songs, even demos. :) 👍
 
a6m5
Damn! Beatles songs are worth that much? Paul McCartney should buy some of them back. He's probably worth over billion by now. If they are still friends, maybe something can be worked out.
Jacko paid around 95 million for the entire catalog back in the early mid '80s after Paul told him they were up for sale. Big mistake. Jacko then sold half of the catalog to Sony for 160 million or so. They own half, and Jacko owns the other half. That means the full collection is worth 900-1,000 million dollars.

Sony is not going to sell it, and Paul swore he would never buy the collection from Jacko. Just think, Paul could have been the world's first multi billionaire musician if he'd only kept his mouth shut.
 
Oh, well. I guess, one billion is still a lot. I heard that he was worth almost 900 million dollars, back in the 90's. I didn't know that Paul didn't want to buy his songs from Michael Jackson. Sounds like they had a
falling out?
 
Something tells me that he won't let it be... i've got a feeling that if he wants to get back what was once his, it will take him a long, long, long time. It's even harder since the back catalogue is not all together now. And Sony will probably part with their share for no one. It's all too much for MacCartney to afford, even though his own financial situation is getting better all the time. Although in a recent statement about Jackson's share, MacCartney joked to Michael "Maybe you'd give them back to me for my birthday when I'm 64? But then again, you never give me your money.. but the two of us could come together to buy back Sony's share?..." But who ever owns the rights to the Beatles music, you can bet that the taxman will get his share either way... unless there is a revolution... Good night.

:sly:
 
Touring Mars
Something tells me that he won't let it be... i've got a feeling that if he wants to get back what was once his, it will take him a long, long, long time. It's even harder since the back catalogue is not all together now. And Sony will probably part with their share for no one. It's all too much for MacCartney to afford, even though his own financial situation is getting better all the time. Although in a recent statement about Jackson's share, MacCartney joked to Michael "Maybe you'd give them back to me for my birthday when I'm 64? But then again, you never give me your money.. but the two of us could come together to buy back Sony's share?..." But who ever owns the rights to the Beatles music, you can bet that the taxman will get his share either way... unless there is a revolution... Good night.

:sly:
Well done! :lol:👍
 
a6m5
Well done! :lol:👍

:D Ta!... there are 17 Beatles' song titles in there...
 
(late....extremem late) I think he's guilty, and the only thing accomplished by the trial was to set him free to do it again. and watch, a few years down the line, it'll happen again, and he'll pay off more people, and again, be free to go out and do it again.
 
What have Michael Jackson and an iPod got in common?


Both are white, plastic and easily turned on by kids.
 
hahaha, I havent heard that one before. I have some MJ jokes, but they're not exactly pg-13.
 
Famine
What have Michael Jackson and an iPod got in common?


Both are white, plastic and easily turned on by kids.

Man, that was too good for words!!!! :lol:
 
Famine
What have Michael Jackson and an iPod got in common?


Both are white, plastic and easily turned on by kids.
That is the best Michael Jackson joke I've heard. :lol:👍
 
eek3.gif
 
So umm... yeah you guys might want to avoid this guy too. :rolleyes: Why do they all have to live near me? :irked:
 
VIPFREAK
So umm... yeah you guys might want to avoid this guy too. :rolleyes: Why do they all have to live near me? :irked:
He's absolutely disgusting. 👎
 
...Go away Mrs. Jackson...
 
Way to bring back an almost 3 month old thread.
 
The f ..... hell?

Blake
 
Blake
The f ..... hell?
I agree. This thread is getting weirder than Michael Jackson himself.
 
Request to the mods:

Close this frickin' thread forever, and instantly delete any new thread anybody tries to post that has anything to do with Michael Effing Jackson.

Give us a break...
 
Back