While I do agree it was nothing more than a racing accident, his attempt at a pass, from Bianchi's onboards at least, looked slightly optimistic.
And the stewards agreed with that assessment, handing down a twenty-five second post-race penalty.
Based on what I can see of it, Frijns was caught between a rock and a hard place: he was attacking Bianchi and defending against Magnussen at the same time. The only reason why he had a go at Bianchi in the first place is because Bianchi made a mistake. I watched an onboard lap of the circuit with Michael Schumacher, and Schumacher hugs that inside kerb. From the rear view on Bianchi's car, Frijns takes that line, but Bianchi is a little wide. He moves across the close the gap and Frijns hits him. He's not at fault, though; by this point, Frijns is in his blind spot, and so the burden of responsibility rests with Frijns, since he is the one who could have avoided the contact. So I don't doubt Frijns' responsibility here - I'm just questioning the claims that he did it deliberately.
Frank Lagorce nearly dying of apoplexy while commenting is also pretty funny. For the non-French speaking folks, he's blatantly blaming Frijns for the accident, even during the replay. Since when was Frank "moving chicane" Lagorce in a position to speak as such?
It wouldn't be motorsport without jingoistic commentary. Bianchi
really needed to win the title if he wanted any hope of making it into Formula 1. He was highly-rated when he dominated Formula 3 a few years ago, but took his sweet time in GP2 and never won that title. He had to win the Formula Renault title in his first season, and the fact that Frijns was in his first year and racing without the support of established Formula 1 teams like Bianchi has just makes the loss all the more galling.
I don't know what the French are complaining about, though. They had no Formula 1 drivers in 2011. Now they have three. I don't see what a fourth will do, especially when he under-performs in the junior series.