ITCC_Andrew
(Banned)
- 18,532
- Kitchener
Look how controlled the oversteer is in the video Clark posted. I'm going to assume it's Walter Rohrl, since that's who Clark mentioned... Rohrl is definitely a better driver.
Fact is, cars that are hard to drive are normally faster when they're not driven beyond the limit of adhesion, and who wants to crash?
Seriously, it's not all that great of a video because it's clearly not the fastest driver in that car. He's skidding too much, it seems like a show-boaty driving style, and I can't help but think that he's a slow driver.
Hey so... let's repeat what McLaren highlighted.
Is it hard to drive, or isn't it?
I take it you've driven many 911 variations extensively and intensively to give us this critical information.
It's hard to drive fast. Read what Clark said above you.
Well, to be fair, there wasn't a lot of 911 in the 911 GT1. Especially not after 1996 when they redid most of it and what little was there became "it has the same headlights as the 996."
![]()
I really wish Walter Rohrl wasn't such a show off, he should concentrate on going fast instead of sliding loads.
And for those who aren't sure, that was sarcasm.
Plus, the car in the original video qualified 3rd in class and finished 3rd in class in the 2009 Spa Six Hours, the first 911 in both cases, so clearly the driver is incompetent.![]()
The Porsche 911 is a poor attempt at a racing car?
Seriously, it's not all that great of a video because it's clearly not the fastest driver in that car. He's skidding too much, it seems like a show-boaty driving style, and I can't help but think that he's a slow driver.
No crash or anything, but an insane qualifing lap of Uwe Alzen in the BMW Z4 GT3 on Nürburgring Nordschleife VLN Layout (Type V in GT5): 8.02:415
But, these cars are a little bit less technologically advanced, and don't have any driver aids.The tires and things also have much less grip.
I think it's safe to say that, although there aren't any Mikko Hirvonen-comparison-worthy CRC drivers, all of rallying is definitely a difficult sport.![]()
WRC cars don't have driver aids last I checked?
Good reason why CRC cars seems slower - they are. Group N spec machines, now WRC R3 category. Built as heavily production based models.
And, during winter stages, studded tires are not legal in Ontario, and only the provincial/regionals competitors are allowed studded tires in Québec.
Then toss in the lack of WRC differentials, and they're very difficult to drive. That's the only point I'm making. WRC is faster because it's WRC. I'm fine with that. CRC is just as hard to drive, but involves driver control a bit more than driver reactions.
What....? I just said it's Group N category / R3. WRC is also called category R1. Faster and more challenging to drive...
Faster, yes. More challenging to drive, arguably. In which aspect do you think it's harder to drive? WRC allows studded snow tires, I believe, for Rally Sweden, etc., which, in my opinion, makes CRC much more difficult.
Furi, I think you've driven on snow before, right? Would you say it's easy? Especially without studded tires?