- 3,008
- You're crazy if you think
- I can afford either of these.
But it's an autooooooooooo! [/whining] Who knows how many miles it actually has, the ad says 99,999 which I'm sure isn't accurate. Course what's funny is the auto version has a 3.2L vs a 3.0L for the manual, and it has 15 more ft-lbs of torque.
Not much really. Unless I'm heading downtown in rush hour there isn't much traffic. Plus the stick in traffic so far hasn't bothered me.Course that depends on how much traffic he's normally in.
just get a miata already!
And a hell of a lot nicer looking.I'd go with the Firebird. Even if anything does break, parts are everywhere. Not to mention it's faster.![]()
Sooo much faster. 👍I'd go with the Firebird. Even if anything does break, parts are everywhere. Not to mention it's faster.![]()
Firechicken. That is all.
And autoHmm I'd go with the T-Bird, less mileage for less moolah, plus if you drop in some Mustang goodies it could be quick and luxurious.
Wow, I'm seriously confused now. My source for 0-60 and 1/4 mile has the F-Body turning times EXACTLY the same as the '95 Mustang GT.
Shes finally cracked and said "If you can afford it..."I thought your Mum didn't approve of the V8? Well, hope things work out for the best.
Wait, what?
lol @ GM in that case.
Though I doubt that's accurate. Might be for about a 1992 or earlier Z or TA with the 350. Because the 350 isn't all that much ballsier than the good 'ol 302.
And about the T-bird idea... 5.0 cars FTW. Not sure when they swapped but... Yeah. Or a Supercoupe. Either one.
Shes finally cracked and said "If you can afford it..."
Nah, I thought it was weird and looked a few different places, the '95 Formula runs 6.7 to 60 and 15.1 in the quarter mile by factory specs. But versus the mustang, we're talking 60 hp difference and .7L. I think it's underrated.
That T-Bird is a 4.6 mod car. Apparently it switched in like '94 from the 5.0 to the 4.6.
I'm still on the lookout for anything sleeper and stick if you guys have any suggestions. For Autotrader, within 75 miles of zip 34212
Nah, I thought it was weird and looked a few different places, the '95 Formula runs 6.7 to 60 and 15.1 in the quarter mile by factory specs. But versus the mustang, we're talking 60 hp difference and .7L. I think it's underrated.
I'd hope so!Er... The Mustang will at least crack the 14s stock with a decent driver.
Meh, it's just GM.
That seems too underrated for a Trans Am. I thought they were low 14s cars?
V8 bug must not like me, but I know the turbo bug bites pretty hard.But, I learned 1 thing. There's 1 thing that bites harder the the VTEC bug, and thats the big V8 bug
V8 bug must not like me, but I know the turbo bug bites pretty hard.