PS: Isn't it curious that all the dutch people came out now happy with the decision? I'm sure you're all completely rational an unbiased.
If they say no further action here then they should take back Vettels penalty too.
I'm sure 99.9% of us want to see more races in F1 as we have seen today. They should forbid this kind of jury jokes after the checkered flag.
Hopefully the precedent is MORE RACING so more fun for us supporters. No matter what colour you like.
Now we have finally some action upfront and we're discussing a slight touché It was a long time ago a racer could overtake Mercedes and Ferrari.
And LeClerc's own earned victory will come for sure.
Being lapped 3 times was helped by the race being on such a short track. If it was Silverstone or Spa....About time we had a decent race. Won't discuss the obvious cause everyone else has that covered, few things down the back of the grid. Giovinazzi's got his first point. Kubica got lapped 3 times, which I don't think has happened since the days of HRT. How Magnussen got beaten by Russell is baffling to me, that drive-through alone was not enough, either Russell is God's gift to F1 and is driving the socks off one of the worst F1 cars of the modern era which is how he finishes so far ahead of Kubica, or Magnussen threw his toys out of the pram again like at Canada and just gave up.
Not really. One driver moved his car towards another while it was alongside to run them out of road, forcing them to choose whether to brake or leave the circuit. The fact that it was a straight rather than a corner is absolutely irrelevant, and the fact that there was a physical barrier there (which is what some people want the white lines to be) is pretty much immaterial - as expanded on in my earlier post on the topic - because running someone beyond track limits is running someone beyond track limits regardless of any further outcome.Oh come on, apart from having 2 cars close to each other, they are incomparable.
I don't think anyone objects to the who - Leclerc would also have been good - but the how.WE WANT A DIFFERENT RACE WINNER.
*different race winner*
NO NOT THAT ONE.
Like it hasn't been done already.Feel free to do it at GT live events and refer to this FIA decision.
It doesn't really matter if it's Schumacher, Verstappen, Senna, or Maldonado, wheel-banging in F1 is outright dangerous.
In my opinion, that's the issue with the decision. This was due to it being Max, at Red Bull Ring, with many Dutch fans attending, and Honda getting a long awaited win.Not sour at all. Will be interesting to see what drivers try in the future and use this in their defence.
Let them race! Amen
Thank god sense prevails.
Honestly I think a lot you complaining about this would be better entertained by watching a simulated Project Cars 2 race, where the AI politely forms a queue, sits at respectable 0.5 second intervals, and occasionally takes a look coming up to a corner.
Really, what do want? Racing, or queuing?
Says the person who claimed LeCrerc was on the wrong.
Yes, because wheel-on-wheel contact at low corner speeds could never result in a car flipping onto its flip-flop roof could it?That is why you need case by case judging. Wheel-banging in a slow hairpin is very different from wheel-banging going flat out on a long straight.
His name is LecLerc.
Says the person who claimed LeCrerc was on the wrong.
Racing is a non-contact sport. When they're making contact, they're not racing. The previous lap was racing - good racing. This wasn't.He was, but I'd still consider it a racing incident. If you can't let these guys race then whats the bloody point.
How many other overtakes did we see in the race where this didn’t happen. There was an attempt on the lap before between the two that was perfectly fair. We saw plenty of racing today and there is only one incident that is being discussed. If people were complaining about every single overtake you might have a point.Thank god sense prevails.
Honestly I think a lot you complaining about this would be better entertained by watching a simulated Project Cars 2 race, where the AI politely forms a queue, sits at respectable 0.5 second intervals, and occasionally takes a look coming up to a corner.
Really, what do want? Racing or queuing?
Yes, because wheel-on-wheel contact at low corner speeds could never result in a car flipping onto its flip-flop roof could it?
He was, but I'd still consider it a racing incident. If you can't let these guys race then whats the bloody point.
Right, no decision for a race director to make. Driver's fault, all the way. /SBianchi died because he kept his foot buried when the circumstances told him to slow down.
This is a matter of opinion and it is wholly not true in non-FIA sanctioned races with fenders (and sometimes not).Racing is a non-contact sport. When they're making contact, they're not racing.
Can someone explain to me how the **** Kubica won DOTD?!
Right, no decision for a race director to make. Driver's fault, all the way.
Come on man.
Your driver won, quit while you're ahead.
It must be some group trolling, and spamming tons of votesCan someone explain to me how the **** Kubica won DOTD?!