- 9,097

- Murica
- BasedAckbar
@JohnBM01 The shorter game translated to about 15-20 minutes less time spent.
Personally, I think they should keep the 48 minutes length, but spread the games out. Why should they play back-backs or even back-to backs-to backs? I'm sure the the schedulers, sponsors, owners, and arenas can accommodate a more spread out season.
Personally, I think they should keep the 48 minutes length, but spread the games out. Why should they play back-backs or even back-to backs-to backs? I'm sure the the schedulers, sponsors, owners, and arenas can accommodate a more spread out season.
