BlakeNo but ITV probably has a problem broadcasting another 30 minutes of F1.
Blake
GT_Fan2005i dont understand how ITV manages to show Football matches with no ad breaks during play, but in F1 there is, its crap.
TalentlessI heard Bob Varsha criticising this, and I think he has a point. The qualifying runs on low fuel will not be indicative of how the cars will run in the race. These cars are not balanced. What the driver's low fuel qualifying will do at best is give some low level cars a few places higher in the grid. Depending on the points that can be had from that, that might not be worth much beyond exposure. Cetainly, it will make no difference for some cars, and some of those that it makes a difference for are likely to be passed within the first 10 laps or at their first pit stop. And that, I would think, can get to a driver.
Brock5000I've got to say I really do miss the old days of low fuel and sticky tyres for qualifying. From a spectator's point of view it was awesome to see them ripping around the tracks at 110%.
They'd lap a number of seconds faster in qualifying than they did during the race, but remember how exciting it was when sometimes a driver was pressing so hard in the closing stages of a race that they'd get close to or even beat the poll time!![]()
BlakeNo, I think he means softer compund tyres ... that is what the term 'sticky' refers to.
Blake
Brock5000I've got to say I really do miss the old days of low fuel and sticky tyres for qualifying. From a spectator's point of view it was awesome to see them ripping around the tracks at 110%.
They'd lap a number of seconds faster in qualifying than they did during the race, but remember how exciting it was when sometimes a driver was pressing so hard in the closing stages of a race that they'd get close to or even beat the poll time!![]()
IIRC a driver would have to set 6 of his 12 laps in the first 30 minutes.usernamedWhen the first car came out after 40 mins of waiting? hm. I enjoy more the current system.