- 12,018

- Indianapolis
- BrandonW77
Marcus, if you're referring to my situation I don't think anything really downloaded. It got to 1% a couple times but never accomplished anything.
carracerptpAfter a short bit testing 2.08, I think that the in-room draft is going to be a pain, and the cars have more low speed grip. High speed grip feels the same.
Also, was it just me (most likely) or has the tire sound been improved?
Quick recap of tonight's session:
-Draft on 'weak' is back to weak
-Resetting 'collision' zaps everyone off the track. Times reset to nice --.--s once people re-enter the track and after that the grid is wrong.
-The car is different. That is Fuji is now somewhat drive-able. It's still off-camber on almost every single corner, the car still understeers, but not dreadfully so, just regular-badly.
So, either we qualify with draft and start the race, or qualify w/o draft and stage manually.
I'm really torn about the draft in free-run/qualifying issue. There are lots of sides to this, benefits to running with and without it, so far I have not been able to come up with many options but I do have one option that will work fine: draft off in qualifying, when finished I will go back to change the settings and we will do a manual grid line up. Since I will be in the lounge I can check the timing monitor and get an accurate starting grid. I'm not happy about that, but so far I see it as the only real option that will keep the majority happy.
To be honest, in my own opinion I like the idea of the draft during qualifying. Overall I don't think it would have a really major effect but it would give the mid-pack guys a chance to qualify closer to the front from time to time and perhaps inject some more variety into our races. The fast guys would still be at the front, but they might have a TrackBound or a NCemtB amongst them to make things interesting. This would likely be sorted out in a lap or two and everyone would be back to their proper pack position. I'm sure Carr is getting a bit tired of running up front all alone.![]()
But that's just my opinion and I rarely impose my own opinion into the series so don't be too concerned, just voicing my thoughts. But keep in mind that we're making a big stink about something that has not yet been proven to have any real effect on our qualifying/racing. It will likely have some effect, could be more or could be less than we anticipate, but I won't be making any real decisions until lots of testing has been done and I know for sure just what the effect(s) will be. Whatever I decide it will be based on the interests of the group as a whole. 👍
To be honest, in my own opinion I like the idea of the draft during qualifying. Overall I don't think it would have a really major effect but it would give the mid-pack guys a chance to qualify closer to the front from time to time and perhaps inject some more variety into our races. The fast guys would still be at the front, but they might have a TrackBound or a NCemtB amongst them to make things interesting. This would likely be sorted out in a lap or two and everyone would be back to their proper pack position. I'm sure Carr is getting a bit tired of running up front all alone.![]()
I have to say that I am rather happy to see the draft now present in free run... For a lesser skilled/experienced guy like me, having the opportunity to get familiar with the draft during free run will save a lot of headache and anxiety when I'm no longer having to get used to it on the first lap or two of a points race. If it saves me, or anyone else from running into someone and costing them a race, how can it not be a good thing?
As far as qualy goes, this group has always done a great job of spreading out and giving each other plenty of room during the session, so I can't imagine that the draft would come into play on any more than the rare occasion.
👍
EDIT: @JP, that was another thing I was going to bring up: If you're drafting someone in qualifying that means you've got traffic to deal with and it means you're going to be right by another car when you get to a turn. This scenario rarely results in a faster time and would most likely negate any advantage gained by drafting. I think we'd all quickly realize that we'd rather not be in the draft because having to deal with the lead car will end up hurting us more than helping us (most of the time). Sure, you got an extra couple mph going down the front stretch at GVE-R, but what are you gonna do when you get to turn 1 and you're bumper-to-bumper with another car? This is generally called a self-correcting problem. And while spelling out etiquette is good in theory, I have no way to review a replay of qualifying so there's not really any way to enforce it. Our group as a whole does a decent job of spreading out during qualifying and I make the session long enough that if you are blocked by traffic you have several more chances to get a flying lap in. That being said, we're most likely not going to have drafting on during qualifying so these issues won't be of concern.
If the draft effect is available to everyone then no one or no group of drivers has any particular advantage or disadvantage. It's just as likely to help a front runner as it is a backmarker. Given that front runners are faster, it's actually more likely they'll catch a slower driver and benefit from drafting during qualifying.
Or are you going to try to find a way to get by to get some clean air?
My only worry is that a pair of fast guys would head out and bump draft or draft hop around the track setting untouchable lap times. I don't think we have people that desperate for P1 though...
I think it won't really be a problem, the front of the grid may get a bigger gap but it may also mix up the grid a bit. My only suggestion is ditch the extra point for the pole. That should keep everyone honest.
With weaker draft I'm okay with quali w./draft. Unless there is obvious collusion (which we'll have to ban specifically) the draft is only gonna matter enough to worry too much on draftfest tracks, where qualifying is pointless anyway. So I'd just add no-collusion clause to the rules and require initial gap of ~5 seconds or so. Manual line-ups annoy me to no end, especially when people start going back&forth and raping their horns.
You sir are awesome. Up beat and no quit in ya. Dare I say. You are one game dog.that is a compliment of the highest order with in my world of dogs.
IRL you can't turn draft off, so I think we should keep it on unless we get some angry competitors who get taken out in qualifying.
We already have some and we haven't even done a qualifying session yet.![]()
.....as long as we don't have ghost cars in the race.
NEVER!!!!!I hate ghost cars, totally defeats the whole purpose of why we're here.
dsgerbcWith weaker draft I'm okay with quali w./draft. Unless there is obvious collusion (which we'll have to ban specifically) the draft is only gonna matter enough to worry too much on draftfest tracks, where qualifying is pointless anyway. So I'd just add no-collusion clause to the rules and require initial gap of ~5 seconds or so. Manual line-ups annoy me to no end, especially when people start going back&forth and raping their horns.
Marcus GarveyI'll be in the room this evening off and on if anyone wants to run some laps.
Lol, if it was only you, Jeff, or you were the worst case, that'd be acceptable.Hey now I resemble those remarks. LoL I like my horn and doing burnouts. Hyperactive maybe.![]()