There's a difference between complaining and constructive criticism. Complaining is (basically what goes on here half the time) for example, "wtf i wanted a lamborghini and they give us these crappy touring cars". While on the other hand, with constructive criticism would be more like this, " I like the new touring cars but it would be nice if PD could have done something else" or something along those lines.![]()
... in the 15-25 age range and hence don't like anyone criticising what they're "into". I'm not saying ALL are 15-25 though and not all 15-25s are immature.
That is all we want.
hmm no. i want Spa, so please don't speak on my behalf
The loss of life that happend in Japan from the Tsunami has nothing to do with some people criticising GT5.
Spa is coming, where have you been?
What???
A piece of software is never complete or fixed, there are always bugs. The fact that they are still working on the game a year down the line is a good thing. World of Warcraft is still getting patches adjusting things, 7 years down the line, it's also one of the most succesful games of all time, and is still the most played online game. But they continue to patch it, the work is never done.
The same reason why we have Windows service packs, the same reason we have any update in software. Most game companies don't bother.
it's funny how people, even though they all knew exactly what will be in spec ii, still moan and complain.
Just ignore them.
I'm very pleased with spec ii, a little bit dissapointed at the dlc - again japanese cars, no gt1/dtm as i hoped and only 1 track which is great but very overrated, i would've loved mt panorama a lot more than spa but whatever, spa's still a great track and will be a nice addition.
It's funny how people, even though they all knew exactly what will be in Spec II, still moan and complain.
Just ignore them.
I'm very pleased with Spec II, a little bit dissapointed at the DLC - again Japanese cars, no GT1/DTM as I hoped and only 1 track which is great but very overrated, I would've loved Mt Panorama a lot more than Spa but whatever, Spa's still a great track and will be a nice addition.
There's a big difference from looking at a list of content written on a website and actually getting to see the content for yourself. Example.
Before Spec 2.0: "Great, basic interior views for standard cars!"
After Spec 2.0: "Oh ****, is that what they meant, that looks crap"
Hence the reason people wait until they see for themselves until they decide what they think about it.
Many standard cars are as incredible as the premiums. Try driving the Formula Gran Turismo in cockpit view. Just racing that one standard on all the tracks in the game is worth the price of GT5 (including its DLC)!
It's funny how people, even though they all knew exactly what will be in Spec II, still moan and complain.
Just ignore them.
I'm very pleased with Spec II, a little bit dissapointed at the DLC - again Japanese cars, no GT1/DTM as I hoped and only 1 track which is great but very overrated, I would've loved Mt Panorama a lot more than Spa but whatever, Spa's still a great track and will be a nice addition.
What? The OP is basically saying "take it easy on PD because a bunch of peopled died in the Tsunami" What does that have to do with people giving their opinion on GT5?
I could see if PD got wiped out but they didn't.
Don't try to defend PD by bringing up a Natural Disaster..They have nothing to do with each other. Now do you understand?![]()
There are multiple threads on 2.0 features not advertised. And if you could tell me before the update what "changed physics" meant, you would have to be psychic.
Many standard cars are as incredible as the premiums. Try driving the Formula Gran Turismo in cockpit view. Just racing that one standard on all the tracks in the game is worth the price of GT5 (including its DLC)!
I'm pretty sure there would be a lot less negative comments on the updates of GT5, if Polyphony Digital communicated with their fans more. It wouldn't hurt them to ask us for our opinions, too.
I think with this communication barrier, people start to assume things, which snowballs into huge expectations. Just my 2 cents...
It's a racing simulation y'all. Your opinions have nothing to do with it. You act like you design cars, manufacture parts, or manage race teams. You're nobody but a dude with a playstation account. PD does their own homework with real people that are actually involved in professional racing.
There's a big difference from looking at a list of content written on a website and actually getting to see the content for yourself. Example.
Before Spec 2.0: "Great, basic interior views for standard cars!"
After Spec 2.0: "Oh ****, is that what they meant, that looks crap"
Hence the reason people wait until they see for themselves until they decide what they think about it.
Many standard cars are as incredible as the premiums. Try driving the Formula Gran Turismo in cockpit view. Just racing that one standard on all the tracks in the game is worth the price of GT5 (including its DLC)!
It's a racing simulation y'all. Your opinions have nothing to do with it. You act like you design cars, manufacture parts, or manage race teams. You're nobody but a dude with a playstation account. PD does their own homework with real people that are actually involved in professional racing.