GTjazzabrandy
(Banned)
- 609

Autoblog Link
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/08/geneva-preview-peugeot-sr1-concept-trades-quirk-for-the-safe-ye/
Looks better than the 407 coupe, thats for sure.
It looks like the Toyota Ft-86 Concept.
It certainly is a return to form for Peugeot. (Although I like the 308/308CC)
This concept is better, but although it's "nice", it's still strangely bland.
I like it...but it looks more...British, than French....
It reminds me of an Aston.
The 308s are hideous, IMO. This concept is better, but although it's "nice", it's still strangely bland. Peugeot needs to find their own design identity again, and I really don't think in-house designers are the way to go. Not a single modern Peugeot has been attractive since they stopped getting Pininfarina to pen the shapes.
What's wrong with bland?
IMO, a lot of very attractive cars are pretty "bland."
But maybe that's just because I don't like overstyled cars?
Nobody is going to like every detail on some new cars that have very complex styling. And those elements that don't quite fit the car make it difficult for the car to go from looking 'nice' or 'good' to looking beautiful or whatever.
It's so much easier to make a bland car with an excellent shape and use your pen wisely and conservatively if you want to make a truly great looking car.
Do you like the new RC-Z coupe?
The Peugeot we're all discussing just looks like "generic convertible" with a few hints of Aston Martin. Peugeot really need their own design language, something that makes you think "yep, that's a Peugeot". The old Pininfarina ones had that. The only thing that makes you think "yep, that's a Peugeot" with modern Pugs is the bloody awful grille they attach to all of them.
I disagree. Genuinely attractive cars are often very distinctive. A Ferrari looks like a Ferrari, if you removed all the badges you could still tell exactly who made it. Same goes for Lamborghinis, same goes for Porsches, same even goes for Renaults. The Peugeot we're all discussing just looks like "generic convertible" with a few hints of Aston Martin. Peugeot really need their own design language, something that makes you think "yep, that's a Peugeot". The old Pininfarina ones had that. The only thing that makes you think "yep, that's a Peugeot" with modern Pugs is the bloody awful grille they attach to all of them.
Does a car (especially a concept) really have to have that brand identity to make a good design? True, I wouldn't have a clue what brand the SR1 is from without Pug badges, but I think it looks quite alright if you simply look at it as a car.
You're a good designer when you have the guts to move on and design everything from scratch. Without any influences from the past. In my opinion.