PlayStation 4 General DiscussionPS4 

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sier_Pinski
  • 9,445 comments
  • 642,633 views
ifq2pj.png

Ugh, the picture got cut off.
Anyway, it said "Tired of 13 year old trash talkers? Gaming will never be the same."

Wonder what they mean..
 
Strange.

And given the fact that the PS4 will allegedly ship with a microphone, I'd say we'll have to put up with even more 13 year old trash talkers.
 
Last edited:
Well one good thing for Nivida is that they're now supporting the PS4 by adding their PhysX and APEX software.

Wonder why Sony ditched Nvidia's Cell processor Architecture!
 
Still hoping they go kind of retro style and build it looking similar to the fat PS2. Still think everything about that generation was better. Colors, logo, system itself etc.
 
Well one good thing for Nivida is that they're now supporting the PS4 by adding their PhysX and APEX software.

Wonder why Sony ditched Nvidia's Cell processor Architecture!
IBM, Sony & Toshiba - Cell CPU
Nvidia - RSX GPU

Nvidia want top dollar for their products, always have & always will. Both MS & Sony decided to go elsewhere (cheaper more suitable route for their respective consoles) for their GPU & CPU. So the flipside to Nvidia's statement from both MS & Sony could be that they didn't want to shell out Nvidia money for what could be achieved elsewhere for cheaper, especially in the long run.

My humble opinion....Nvidia are the Apple of GPU manufacturers.....great product, but overpriced (nothing wrong with that, as many are willing to pay top dollar for a certain product).
 
I would think making people remake an account would prove disasterious for Sony, Would be a smart move for them to simply allow current PSN members to just transfer right on over.
 
The thing with AMD vs. Nvidia is that AMD are pretty desperate at this point and Nvidia really aren't. Nvidia has their Tegra chip for mobile devices, their Shield project and they can afford to bring things like the GTX Titan to the consumer market so they've pretty much proven how not bothered they are. AMD, on the other hand, is haemorrhaging money ($630 million in just two quarters, according to Anandtech). I imagine the console companies got a very good price from AMD, one that Nvidia didn't care to match.

Given the noise Sony made about SEN I'd be really surprised if they started PSN accounts from scratch again. That would be a totally illogical move.
 
I'm wondering on information about PSN accounts as well, perhaps at E3 Sony will enlighten the masses.

They showed a guys account on PS4 and he had almost 2000 trophies. Certainly it carried over from PS3
 
Sadly either the video is so compressed that you can't tell whats new or it doesn't show anything not possible on PS3. The lighting in Call of Duty Black Ops is amazing.
 
Another FF 13 sucked bad enough why another one. They went bad after 12 c'mon its time to retire FF.
 
CAMAROBOY69
I thought FF13 was incredible. Loved that game from beginning to end on the 360. I never played FF13-2.

Story wise FF is always good but gameplay lacks originality now. Its like any other modern RPG. I understand people don't want to the old fashion choose your attack and wait for the attack. But I don't like FF anymore. I'll happily wait for KH remake
 
Story wise FF is always good but gameplay lacks originality now. Its like any other modern RPG. I understand people don't want to the old fashion choose your attack and wait for the attack. But I don't like FF anymore. I'll happily wait for KH remake

I do.
 
Turn based "static" RPGs are the only RPGs I'll play. I don't like any game with "active battle" or anything like that. That takes you away from a tactical RPG and into an action game IMO. FFX was the last game I enjoyed.
 
Story wise FF is always good but gameplay lacks originality now. Its like any other modern RPG. I understand people don't want to the old fashion choose your attack and wait for the attack. But I don't like FF anymore. I'll happily wait for KH remake
I cant stand "true" turn based RPGS. In fact I hate them. Its the only games I just cant stand. Thats why I ended up loving FF13. You didnt have to wait to attack. I like the "active battle". You could attack and the enemy could attack without waiting. Loved that. If FF13 would have had turn based, I wouldnt have bought it. I actually had no interrest in the game until I played the demo. Once I realized it wasnt a true turn based game, I was shocked how much I enjoyed it. One of the best games the year it came out on the 360.
 
SimonK
Turn based "static" RPGs are the only RPGs I'll play. I don't like any game with "active battle" or anything like that. That takes you away from a tactical RPG and into an action game IMO. FFX was the last game I enjoyed.

I miss blue dragon and other classics Square enix games but their new games are dying down the brand.
 
Back