You might find grinding the same handful of races over any over fun but not everyone does. What is wrong with stopping the grind being neccessary? Or at the very least reducing it to what it was in the earlier GT games?
Can you provide your source for this information or are you just making it up? This might be the case but it never used to be, so we could see a return to an in game economy more akin to earlier titles, which would be great IMO. We could see an entirely new structure or you could be right, but you keep putting your view as though it is factual information, so you must have inside knowldege right? Please share the source.
No one said it sohuld be easy and no one said it should only take 5 minutes. There is a big difference between grinding and a challenge. It is not hard to grind, it is just boring and ecessively time consuming. Look you've already been shown the differences in the amount of time it takes in GT Sport compared to other games. You've been asked your opinion on various other points and instead of acknowledging or progressing this discussion you elect to ignore every point raised and repeat the same anal argument (which is not even an argument it a fallicious load of bull crap). I suggest you start responding to points rather than just putting your fingers in your ears and going "la la la la la".
Of course you can because what they can do in the game during that time is defined in a large way by the games economy. Remember no one is saying it should only take 5 minutes to afford everything or even one of the 20m Cr cars. Only you are bringing that up. If a person is spending a reasonable amount of time in the game but getting hardly anywhere they have a right to complain, it doesn't matter if another person spends 10hrs a day every day on it and has gotten a lot further.
Provide a source or stop stating your guesswork (which may or may not end up being right but is guesswork all the same) as fact.
No you don't, did the jews have to just accept extermination during WW2 because that's just the way it was in Nazi Gernamy or could the ones that had a chance to do something about it and hide or get out? Your argument has absolutely zero logic to it. If people went by your logic nothing would ever change because everything would just be "the way it is and that's that". What an absolutely absured view.
It's the players that are calling for bigger credits payouts, and they are the ones that want everything in 5 minutes so they don't need to grind, which is wrong. You need to Grind and if you don't, well it is your issues and not the game ok sunshine. So if PD gives us low credits payouts for GT7, you just have to accept it on what you get in the game ok.
Roger that.
Are you going to actually answer a single point raised or just keep repeating the same illogical bs over an over, becuase if you don't start actually trying to move this discussion forward and keep ignoring everyones points you're getting reported for trolling.
They require approximately the same amount of time to win enough money to buy the highest value cars.
After several posts of "GT Sport isn't a Numbered game" being a reason why the economy is different, now you're claiming GT7's economy will be the same as GT Sport's, despite being a numbered game?
Believe it or not, there is a time period somewhere between five minutes and seven solid days. They're not the only two options.
Grinding isn't playing. Nor is cheating playing.
Not in the face of what it is you need the money for. A game's economy isn't just what you earn but what you spend. GT Sport pays out money at the second quickest rate in the entire history of Gran Turismo, but it takes the second most amount of time in the entire history of Gran Turismo to earn enough money to buy the most expensive cars.
We don't know anything about GT7's economy yet.
We don't know anything about GT7's economy yet.
This still isn't a sensible point of any kind.
There isn't a specific number - it depends entirely on the content. It'd be silly to have 35 hours of races but only need five hours to acquire all the cars... or vice versa. And GT Sport's economy should always have been tilted towards Sport Mode (the "Career" didn't exist until two months post launch), with higher payouts for not only online racing but consistently racing online - a GT6-like bonus, increasing for each successive day you did a Daily Race, up to a 2x or 3x cap.
Interesting concept.
Well, that's certainly true
Indeed, and this is what our... "sunshine" is missing. A game's economy is what you get vs. what you spend; a game which pays out far too much money compared to what you need to spend is as bad as one which has too little. Nobody wants his putative "five minutes" game, but the 168-hour version is also absurd, not least because most of those hours come from doing one single race eight hundred times.
No, you've bought the game. If they do that its a crappy move to charge people to make the in game economy acceptable as opposed to just making it balanced in the game in the first place.
It'd be a credit booster for "car collector" players.
Fair enough, as a purely optional thing then in theory I don't have an issue with it. However in practice, where speeding up a game economy has been monetised it's usually with the caveat that the normal economy only gets you so far before you have to grind like mad which then encourages people to either give up or more towards the economy boost package. Granted most titles with these features are mobile apps or free to play otherwise, but from a business model if the economy is just fine as it is, a boost pack might not be worth offering.I was meaning that option in an already balanced economy,
to accelerate the incomes for those poeple who haven't much time to spend on the game, or simply for players aiming to own every cars in the game (if it is +600) etc...
An option to buy in the PS Store instead of buying cars directly from the PS Store...
And no I haven't bought Gran Turismo 7 yet !
If they do it right it would be fine as an option, but if they announced such a pack I would immediately be sceptical based on previous experiance. Doesn't mean it would be bad, I'd just be cautious until I've seen that it works fine without the pack.
. 
