- 10,116
- Maryland, USA
- swift-bass
You guy's the pre-order situation really isn't as bad as you think....if your first on the list lol.
I'm first on the list, so I'm not worried at all.
And you wonder why nobody likes you!
You guy's the pre-order situation really isn't as bad as you think....if your first on the list lol.
I'm first on the list, so I'm not worried at all.
And you wonder why nobody likes you!
![]()
IGNOctober 11, 2006 - HDMI port, Blu-Ray drive, Cell processor -- the PS3 will ship with everything needed for high definition playback. Everything except for high definition cables, that is.
The latest issue of Famitsu contains a first report on the cables that will be included with the Japanese version of the PS3. Purchasers of either the 60 Gig or 20 Gig models will get a power cord, USB cable, ethernet cable and standard composite AV cable.
That's right! No component, HDMI or D cables are included in the box! While Sony hasn't announced the wiring that will be bundled with the US version of the system, in Japan at least, those who want high definition cables will have to make a separate purchase.
On the plus side, the PS3's AV Multi Out interface accepts the same cables that you used with your PS2, so if you already have S-Video, D or Component cables, you should be able to reuse them.
Wow, that was back when EGM was a quality magazine. Good times. I still have that issue, I beleive. I also beleive that was back when I was laughing at morons who rushed out to buy the thing in the first place, while sitting at home playing my Dreamcast.
I don't think so.( Can 360 use xbox component cable?)
And I'm sure there will be a Dual-Shock 2 adapter somewhere down the line. Don't get me wrong: not including the ability to use the XBox cords on the 360 is silly and the biggest travesty since the Sega Saturn connector cords being not quite close enouh to the Genny's (Will you look at that! Another Sega-MS parallel.), but Sony isn't innocent either. Besides, there is also the PS2 HDD and original PS2 remote as well in the context of the PS2 revisions.Jeremy RicciController = 39.99
Remote = 29.99
Adapter = 9.99 - 11.99
Ahem.
And I'm sure there will be a Dual-Shock 2 adapter somewhere down the line. Don't get me wrong: not including the ability to use the XBox cords on the 360 is silly and the biggest travesty since the Sega Saturn connector cords being not quite close enouh to the Genny's (Will you look at that! Another Sega-MS parallel.), but Sony isn't innocent either. Besides, there is also the PS2 HDD and original PS2 remote as well in the context of the PS2 revisions.
The PS2 HDD was only needed for one game, not a huge feature for Xbox Live. And Microsoft is more guilty.Ahem.
And I'm sure there will be a Dual-Shock 2 adapter somewhere down the line. Don't get me wrong: not including the ability to use the XBox cords on the 360 is silly and the biggest travesty since the Sega Saturn connector cords being not quite close enouh to the Genny's (Will you look at that! Another Sega-MS parallel.), but Sony isn't innocent either. Besides, there is also the PS2 HDD and original PS2 remote as well in the context of the PS2 revisions.
X360 Controller ($50) + Play-and-Charge Kit ($20) (that kind of thing already comes with the PS3) = $70. And even without the kit the controller still costs $10 more. And heck, even Nintendo's controller is $60 ($60 Wiimote + $20 Nunchuck).Controller = 39.99
Not arguing against that, it's a total POS.Remote = 29.99
It's better than $100 for the X360 HDD you need to have for the X360 "backward compatibility", and even still, it's worth the $10 to have full backward compatibility. And speaking of adapters, Nintendo will probably have some $30 Ethernet adapter for Ethernet cables if you don't have Wi-Fi.Adapter = 9.99 - 11.99
Yes, one game bought by millions upon millions of people. It would be like requiring an adaptor to play the original SMB on the NES, then making it so the adaptor didn't fit.Duċk;2449668The PS2 HDD was only needed for one game, not a huge feature for Xbox Live. And Microsoft is more guilty.
This one wasn't one of them I was referencing. Perhaps I should have bolded them.DuckX360 Controller ($50) + Play-and-Charge Kit ($20) (that kind of thing already comes with the PS3) = $70. And even without the kit the controller still costs $10 more. And heck, even Nintendo's controller is $60 ($60 Wiimote + $20 Nunchuck).
It's still not fair when you take into account the fact that Sony has always been for backwards compatibility. Microsoft is rather exempt from this as Peter Moore won't shut up about how backwards compatability not being important (despite this being to the contrary for more than 20 years), and as such they kind of wrote themselve out of it by labeling it as a privelage.DuckIt's better than $100 for the X360 HDD you need to have for the X360 "backward compatibility", and even still, it's worth the $10 to have full backward compatibility. And speaking of adapters, Nintendo will probably have some $30 Ethernet adapter for Ethernet cables if you don't have Wi-Fi.
Yes, one game bought by millions upon millions of people. It would be like requiring an adaptor to play the original SMB on the NES, then making it so the adaptor didn't fit.
This one wasn't one of them I was referencing. Perhaps I should have bolded them.
It's still not fair when you take into account the fact that Sony has always been for backwards compatibility. Microsoft is rather exempt from this as Peter Moore won't shut up about how backwards compatability not being important (despite this being to the contrary for more than 20 years), and as such they kind of wrote themselve out of it by labeling it as a privelage.
Sony has never made it necessary to buy something for backwards compatability (despite it being the norm, truthfully). You can't tell me that with all of the amazing slots and expansion areas Sony couldn't have slipped both a Dual Shock slot and a Memory card slot for less than $10 combined.
And you were going so well...So, why is this? Becuase Sony introduced it? Sony also introduced the block system to Memory Cards, remember.Maybe because an HDD has a significantly faster write speed, and Memcards are obsolete?
You do realise that Sony is suffering tremendous losses on even the 20GB PS3, right? I'm sure $10 for both memory card support and control wouldn't really be too much to stomach.Jeremy RicciSony saves money on costs to leave it out.
If $100 really offends your backwards-compatability sensebilities, and you have original XBox games; maybe you could, you know, play them on your original XBox. 💡Jeremy Ricci$10 one time purchase sure beats a $100 premium to enjoy your favorite Xbox games that may or may not work on your 360.
Of course! No one bought the original Playstation or Playstation 2. By that logic Microsofts stance on backwards compatability is correct and Sony shouldn't even bother with it at all.Jeremy RicciOtherwise they end up having to integrate that hardware to function with the new system, and then to function only with PS1 and PS2 games.
True, but having a massive old console on your shelf takes up space.maybe you could, you know, play them on your original XBox. 💡
That must be the problem then, because I've never had any reservations about having an older console hooked up (PS2 compatability issues taught me that, with various problems with Sega systems reinforced it).Duċk;2449728True, but having a massive old console on your shelf takes up space.
Same here. Or I might keep mine for novelty purposes, since my schoolbook takes twice as much space.I wish i could get rid of my xbox but i still play a few games that dont work on the 360. I WILL get rid of my ps2 when i get ps3.
And you were going so well...So, why is this? Becuase Sony introduced it? Sony also introduced the block system to Memory Cards, remember.
Anyways, I'd like to know how this is the case, when memory cards were introduced to consoles after hard drives for saving games. In addition, if memory card are obsolete, than so are all forms of non-HDD based storage, including SD cards and Flash-based memory because the concept is exactly the same.
You do realise that Sony is suffering tremendous losses on even the 20GB PS3, right? I'm sure $10 for both memory card support and control wouldn't really be too much to stomach.
If $100 really offends your backwards-compatability sensebilities, and you have original XBox games; maybe you could, you know, play them on your original XBox. 💡
The only reasons I'm angered by Sony not including these things with the PS3 is because:
- Sony set themselves up for it by not requiring it before, and
- The cost hit Sony will take is negligable compared to everything else
Of course! No one bought the original Playstation or Playstation 2. By that logic Microsofts stance on backwards compatability is correct and Sony shouldn't even bother with it at all.
I saw your points. However, I'd like you two to debate for us people-with-no-lives to read.I don't even know if I should bother wasting my time pulling the legs out from under your "points".
If you can't see what I'm talking about, then it's best I not enter a debate on the topic, or persue it any further, as you will likely not understand what I am saying to you anyway.
Right, I'm sorry that I forgot that as I don't preach the gospel of Sony, and that as my opinion isn't 100% pro-PS3 and anti-Nintendo and Microsoft; everything I say is wrong, without a point and not of my understanding.I don't even know if I should bother wasting my time pulling the legs out from under your "points".
If you can't see what I'm talking about, then it's best I not enter a debate on the topic, or persue it any further, as you will likely not understand what I am saying to you anyway.
Yea. I'd like to witness this one of these from the OUTSIDE looking in myself, so get to it. HA HA HADuċk;2449757I saw your points. However, I'd like you two to debate for us people-with-no-lives to read.![]()
BTW, look at the first year of games the PS3 offers:
Grand Theft Auto IV