The87Dodge
(Banned)
- 3,184
- Seattle, WA
- rizkeat
I really don't see the point of spoilers like this on a roadster.Ew, what a disgusting spoiler.
![]()
I've seen good Z3's in the past, this ain't one. Not with that spoiler.
I really don't see the point of spoilers like this on a roadster.Ew, what a disgusting spoiler.
![]()
I've seen good Z3's in the past, this ain't one. Not with that spoiler.
What do you mean?I really don't see the point of spoilers like this on a roadster.
They don't make the car look better or boost performance, especially for a car thats FF.I think the end plates are upside down
What do you mean?
The Z3 is FR...?They don't make the car look better or boost performance, especially for a car thats FF.
Which the Z3 isn't.a car thats FF.
They don't make the car look better or boost performance, especially for a car thats FF.
It's looks normal to me.I think the end plates are upside down![]()
Ever heard of track days?Since street racing is not legal, all that extra downforce is not needed.
Ever heard of track days?
+1 for questionable.the wing is still hideous
-10 for logic.does not increase performance.
all that extra downforce is not needed.
does not increase performance.
-100 for contradictory statements.They don't boost performance
???+1 for questionable.
-10 for logic.
-100 for contradictory statements.
You said all that extra down force is not needed, then proceeded to say it didn't even exist. Thus, a contradiction.
It is indeed ugly, but I'm not sure what street racing has to do with a spoiler.FF or not, the wing is still hideous and does not increase performance. Since street racing is not legal, all that extra downforce is not needed.
It's a bit Slammed.
Also i should have posted a better image to show the interior with all the racing seats and big ass speakers and such.
Okay it might be not that bad compared to usual civic's but it was just visual modification, no engine or something like that of modification.
Also i said:
Which means this isn't that bad compared to what i have saw (i wished if i took some images of those cars).
Also @eight6er and @Team THRT Drift do you mean by saying that they aren't riced out is that those are good one's?
--------------------------
Anyway based on what you guys said: does these count as questionable or not?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm not sure with the first half one's but the second half one's are definitely questionable IMO.
I checked couple pages and it seems that chrome paints also counts.I'm not saying they are what I would do to a car, or that they look amazing, just that I don't see anything questionable about the mods on those first two civics. They seem almost stock.
In those new pics some of the cars are questionable, some are almost stock. Is chrome paint/ wrap questionable, or what is wrong with the Audi and Lamborghini?
Ok you won the thread with that beauty lol. I love the way he had to tell us about the ram air on the back, like he had to fill that space with something rightHere's a compilation of riced out Chevrolet Cavaliers.
Oh, and I apologize for all my stupid comments about the BMW Z3 that was posted earlier.
View attachment 358711
Yeah, the only reason why it is ricey is because of that bulky bodykitThe first Cavalier isn't that bad, it looks like a pretty standard early 2000's modified compact.
That does nothing for it, god it's hideous.It's on airbags
Definitely not a w124![]()
![]()
Not sure if I am right, but I think it could be an Audi TT because of the headlights.![]()
No clue as to what this car actually is.
I love how it looks like it is scarred for life because of the modification applied to it.![]()
No clue as to what this car actually is.