Questionable modifications: pictures inside!

[wrcsti]

Its not really Questionable but I like the tape and stickers

choose a driver and stick to it!

 

[Tornado]

a ute is a vehicle with one piece body and bed, a pickup has the bed and cab separate
doesn't matter which part of the world it means the same.

That's not necessarily true either. The Honda Ridgeline isn't really a ute.

 

[Barracuda]

That's not necessarily true either. The Honda Ridgeline isn't really a ute.

I wouldn't call it a real truck either. I'd like to meet the idiot whos idea it was to make sloping bed sides

 

[buickgnx88]

I'd like to meet the idiot whose idea it was to put the spare in the in-bed trunk, much less have an in-bed trunk that's under the load floor!

 

[benzoboy]

I was thinking, there aren't enough utes in this thread. Then the Comanche thing was posted. Then I found this.

That's not questionable, that's bad-ass.

 

[buickgnx88]

It would only be bad ass if they lifted it and put on some larger tires. The way they have it with the chrome 18's(?) and lowered makes it just as bad as the bosoku cars from Japan, with their largely exagerated parts.

 

[slidesquad#1]

a ute is a vehicle with one piece body and bed, a pickup has the bed and cab separate
doesn't matter which part of the world it means the same.

So the Falcon isn't an ute?

 

[buickgnx88]

A ute is a car with a pickup bed, simple as that.

 

[stumpydino]

looks like a hideous mismatched pickup to me

 

[Perfect Balance]

That's not questionable, that's bad-ass.

No.


It isn't.


The End.

 

[Danny]

Nothing is safe.

 

[Sniffs]

I got an Idea, guys. let's pull the Ute vs Pickup thread out and argue it there, and leave the wacky mod people have THEIR fun.

 

[TheCracker]

Greenwood Vette?

Greenwood Vette convertible:



Or is this the exact same car with the removable hard-top off?

 

[Danny]

It does look to be a removable hardtop...

 

[buickgnx88]

Nothing is safe.

Is it just me or does the very rear looked like it was spliced on in Photoshop?

 

[TheCracker]

Is it just me or does the very rear looked like it was spliced on in Photoshop?

It does look Photoshoped, but sadly is not

From the back:

 

[buickgnx88]

Ah ok then, now it does look hideous.

 

[land sea air]

I bet all those real classics in the background of the first pic are either laughing or crying...

 

[V1P3R]

Well... it would've been a pretty cool Transformers?

 

[stumpydino]

greenwood daytonas were pretty nippy apparently
designed for function so i read

 

[Perfect Balance]

designed for function so i read

Makes you wonder what "function" they were going for.

 

[Jim Prower]

I imagine that there was some aero advantage, maybe. then again, maybe not.

 

[land sea air]

it's gonna take more than a "pretty nippy" to outrun that kind of ugly

 

[V1P3R]

lol

 

[Perfect Balance]

 

[Rykon Zero]

Nooooooooooo... Why the Quattroporte?!? Why not a POS Civic?!?

 

[Glanza-V]

Burberry is teh gay..Why bother with it anyways just a waste of money and makes the car look stupid ..what an idiot

 

[Jim Prower]

It's gone plaid! It must be moving at Ludicrous Speed!

Meh, I found humor in it.

 

[Delphic Reason]

It's not painted plaid. It's wrapped in plaid paper. If you look close, you can see the edges are not perfectly round, like paper folded over. Definitely questionable, but not as if it was painted.

 

[Glanza-V]

Its burberry not plaid isn't it ? :S