Rate the vehicle above you (READ THE OP)

  • Thread starter Sage Ages
  • 17,289 comments
  • 915,884 views
2/10. Yet another ruined Mini.

740-137.jpg


Volvo 960.
 
I gave it that for neutral. There's no huge wing, and the rims aren't godawful. Doesn't look terribly riced. Also no insane bodykit.
 
For racing Mini.

For riced Acura.

I don't understand your rating. (Not saying it's wrong I just don't understand it.)
"Riced" lmao, the only thing they did was lower it to the perfect height and put some all-in-good-fun stickers on the back
 
"Riced" lmao, the only thing they did was lower it to the perfect height and put some all-in-good-fun stickers on the back
I thought the same thing. It's not a ricer until you have way too much camber, or a huge wing, or a crazy bodykit.
 
You just educated me about this car's existence in the Alfa thread, haha. I'd give it an 8/10. Not the prettiest old Alfa, but very distinctive.

Opel GT:
Opel_GT_992x425_16900.jpg

It was my inspiration for this one. Alfa line up is awsome!

5/10. Neutral

Alfa Romeo Giulietta SZ

alfa_giulietta-sz-zagato-1960-62_r11.jpg
 
It looks like it's trying to ape several cars at once. The Viper, SLS and F-Type for instance.
And the rear end is a joke.
Grave disappointment. It looked so much better with that green camo on.
4/10.

qMDcl28.jpg
 
Back