Rate the vehicle above you (READ THE OP)

[JTB10000]

9/10

 

[CSMDuty11]

8/10, Fat Viper!

 

[TVR27]

10/10 This car was on Toca 3

 

[Neddo]

8/10

 

[TS050]

7/10. Looks pretty good, but I prefer the IS-F. Also, its output isn't as high as what the M5 or the new CTS-V are producing, so it won't be very competitive compared to the other super saloons.(467bhp compared to 560bhp and 640bhp)

2015 Lexus RC F

 

[Slash]

4.5/10

 

[Neddo]

6.5/10

 

[GranTurismo916]

7/10 - Mainly because of NFSU2.

2010 Audi R8 5.2 FSI quattro

 

[TS050]

9/10. Isn't that the easiest supercar to drive out of all of them?

2004 Chrysler ME Four-Twelve

 

[Pagey279]

The OP:

Inspired by the "Rate the song above you" thread.

Simply rate the vehicle posted above you on a scale of 1-10 and then post a new vehicle.
Any type of vehicle is allowed. You are not limited to automobiles.
Although not required, I'd recommend using this as a guide for your rating.
Be reasonable with your rating and give a reason for why. Rating something 0/10 just because you don't like it is not reasonable, unless you have a good reason. Something like being old or ugly isn't a good reason.
You can also use personal experience to support your rating.
Try to consider as many criteria as possible.
To avoid confusion, please refresh the page before you make a post.

Please stick to this, without explanations this thread is a pretty meaningless jumble of pictures and numbers.



Chrysler ME, I can't decide if that is pretty, or ugly, or just pretty ugly. But I think I will go with the former, quite outlandish for Chrysler too not least because it's horrendously fast, 4 turbo chargers for christ sakes! I like it. 7/10

BMW E36 328i

 

[GranTurismo916]

The OP:



Please stick to this, without explanations this thread is a pretty meaningless jumble of pictures and numbers.

I see what you're saying, but we've already discussed that in here and said it's not really necessary unless it's a very low or high rating for a car you'd usually not give one to.

6/10

1964 Panhard PL17 Tigre

 

[TS050]

4/10. Oh. I don't like that at all. Ew.

2014 BMW i8 (IMO, 2014 was the year hybrids got sexy.)

 

[JR98]

4/10. Oh. I don't like that at all. Ew.

View attachment 286115

2014 BMW i8 (IMO, 2014 was the year hybrids got sexy.)

11/10 It just looks sooo goooood.

2014 Shelby Mustang GT500 NFS Movie Edition

 

[GranTurismo916]

4.5/10 - Looks pretty bad...

1991 Nissan 200SX

 

[JR98]

5.5/10

1991 Nissan 200SX

I dunno, it looks nice but it looks rather dull. It's kinda plain. 7/10

2010 Chevrolet Camaro Cup Car

 

[GranTurismo916]

5/10. Why are all of your pics like 300 pixels wide?

1999 TVR Cerbera Speed 6

 

[TS050]

I think it's because he's choosing thumbnail instead of full picture.

--

7/10. The Cerbera isn't my favourite TVR, and it looses points as it's probably liable to breaking down soon.

2011 Ariel Atom V8

 

[Neddo]

better than ordinary version. road f1 8.5/10

 

[MisterWaffles]

5/10. Looks quite boring, Like an old kia magenta. (If it's a high performance version, I would rate it higher but I can't tell it apart)

Qvale Mangusta '02
​

 

[GranTurismo916]

7/10

1969 Matra-Simca MS650

 

[Jason115]

8/10

Toyota FT-1

 

[ViscousTraction]

9/10

 

[TVR27]

10/10

 

[Neddo]

Pretty wonderful 8/10

 

[TVR27]

6/10.

1998 Koenig Lamborghini Diablo (I can't find a better photo of it)

 

[Neddo]

sex/10

 

[TVR27]

8/10

 

[Neddo]

green lights are wierd 9/10

 

[TVR27]

4/10

 

[Neddo]

what is that Ferrari? 8.5/10