Most people are paying well below MSRP for most STI/WRX. Only when the 2011 models were running low in september-october, were people paying more and that was mostly due to required options and accessories that came with all cars.
If you count tax and financing on a higher spec-ed model then yeah, $40k is about right.
This car will take away the few sensible wrx/sti owners still left.
I'll still hold them to the car being priced between the impreza and Legacy. Which leagcy, who knows.
I have heard nothing about STI version having more HP, so when I'm talking about BRZ STI I only mean suspension and brake upgrade. And what you're saying pretty much explains why there won't be 250HP BRZ. Maybe after they either kill STI or give it a power bump. And $29k I'm talking about is also not "out the door price", so it's comparable to $33-34k people give their dealers for STIs (before taxes, fees etc).After dealer markups and such, most people are paying around $40k. 250HP in this car, at 2700 pounds and RWD, will put it on par with a 300HP STi in terms of acceleration and performance. The raw drag times might be a touch slower because of the lol launch you can do with AWD.
Even if it was only 6 grand difference, it would still pull a lot of sales away from the STI, simply because it would be quick and cheap.
Front/back need to swappable between thoseFront of Toyota and rear of Subaru need to be put together.
The BRZ concept STI is proof enough for me.
-> Oohhh...
^ This was unexpected, the BRZ shown here IS the North American version! Nice! 👍
Any auto shows coming up? Or is Detroit in January the next one?
Prices up here tend to get gauged up a bit more because of our weather. Most people seem to think the only option for a sports car is the WRX/STi or an EVO because they must have AWD. I notice when I check 2nd hand ads for Subarus down in Cali, they tend to be a decent amount cheaper than up here.
Gotcha. I think Colorado is somewhat the same.
Subaru's left and right.
Gotcha. I think Colorado is somewhat the same.
Subaru's left and right.
It's largely academic because I can't afford it whatever they price it at, but I reckon mid-twenties would be about right. It offers just enough more than the MX5 to warrant it, and it'd undercut some potentially more desirable rivals in the high-20s by a good few grand.
Gotcha. I think Colorado is somewhat the same.
Subaru's left and right.
^ On a global standpoint? Yes R1600Turbo was right, JDM-land (aka. Tokyo) is next. But here in N. America, the next big one would be Detroit (and yes, like in L.A., Suzuki won't be there either).Any auto shows coming up? Or is Detroit in January the next one?
For some reason I thought you were in SoCal?
Supply and demand, as they say.
I can see base version at $23k-$24k. >$28k is okay for me if it includes STI goodies, hopefully beyond suspension/brakes. Maybe upgraded rear diff?At $23K, its right in my price range. I will do everything I can to get one. Bump that up past $25K, and I can wait. Toyota may be surprised how long I can wait.
-> Hey, lookie, lookie what I found!!!
![]()
SoCal? Is that the west coast, d-bag capitol? No, I'm not offended.
South California....
Which is the west coast, D-bag capital. Well, mostly. The cops certainly are.
Lots of cute Asians though.
Eww, I forgot this thing will have an electronic throttle. I'd have to drive it. That might be a deal-breaker. If it's as good as Mazda's then it won't bother me, but I've never driven one as good as Mazda's except in a Mazda, my friend's 1st-gen 3 being the benchmark.
Why on earth do these throttles hold engine rpm when you let off the gas? Obviously it has cut the throttle immediately because it doesn't rev up, but it doesn't cut the throttle all the way because the rpm hovers where it was when you let off. What's the point? It's annoying as hell and makes it difficult to shift smoothly. When I want off the throttle I want off the throttle right now, damn it.
I think it looks like that one Peugeot. The one that sorta looks like an Audi TT.
In the US, I'm entirely convinced the "sweet spot" is $23K. That's where the MX-5 starts
Oh Jesus. So much for fitting in there.
meMore interesting. AWD cars tend to have parasitic losses at an average of 27%. RWD cars lose about 15%. Slightly less again for FWD.
Flywheel hp Toyobaru = 197, wheelhp ~=168
Flywheel hp 09 WRX = 265, wheelhp ~=193
Toyobaru lbs/whp = 2669/168 = 15.88
WRX lbs/whp = 3152/193 = 16.33
09 WRX must be anemic.
That was a good comparison, I don't really think the Genesis Coupe or Ford Mustang are all that large, that must mean the BR-86S isn't all that large. According to the chart, about two inches longer than the NC MX-5.