Well yeah, obviously there's a bit more to them than that, but i always thought that's what they were classified as....Street car, sure.
The Veyron actually can at 205Mph as done by R&T, so I imagine the SS would hit 210 at best. Of course, that's nothing compared to what the real contenders hit at the Mile.
canoindeed. As much money as there is in that car, it can't possibly be the same as, say, what hks dumped in that damned evo of which i can never remember the name.
ct230r
Awesome vids Mr-X. Had lots of fun reviewing those. Medigo seen that the other day too. It was nice, but EVO could and should hae done a more epic review of that monster Calsonic R32 GT500
.
*NSX-R*
I feel they always sandbagged the other cars in some way. It's clearly apparent that, in the very least, the NSX is being driven far harder than the other cars. It's a good car, but it's not the track weapon BMI would have you believe.
That NSX was supposed to be 4 seconds a lap faster on its best lap then an M3 CSL?
Meanwhile on the Top Gear test track the NSX-R was more than 3 seconds slower than the M3 CSL, and more than 5 seconds slower than a Gallardo.
I must the only guy on the planet who never thought NSX' were anything special, if not borderline overrated. There's no way that video is a true showcase of speed.
The top gear test track is hardly a real track and only gives a basic idea as to how well cars accelerate and handle. Going from a dig is also a big deal, especially with lower powered cars which take time to get up to speed, but don't have to shrug it off much and can go through corners well.
Yes, and I doubt it's hard to notice. Anyways, some laptimes I managed to find.Best Motoring is biased?