Speedster's Gallery // July-October

I know the feeling... not much activity here at the moment unfortunately. I have to say, I like the shots as well. Great effort with the long focal length as well. What lens where you using, is it an IS?

You already know I dig the lambo shot, I think you made great use of what little light you did have available on all the shots.
 
I see you are busy in this part of GTP. 👍

Lucky you...going to Top Gear live. Hope U enjoyed Adam:tup:
 
Hope you enjoyed Top Gear live! That must have been awesome. In looking through your gallery, I am quite impressed. The Porsche model looks real! Great angle to it. Looking forward to more!
 
Oh my god that Gumpert is amazing!

Anyway on a more technical note, I'm very impressed with what you've managed to capture given the conditions. The 350 seems to cope very well at ISO1600, the noise has been kept to a minimum and the shots seem very 'alive'.

The car shots have been frozen perfectly, and the shots of the presenters, although they lack a real target or composition, work well in capturing their expressions. I love how the Stig is just sat there calm as anything with a bike on the roof :lol:

Cheers Moglet, even though I seemed to capture most of the presenters expressions I was surprised to find I only took like 2 of James May! Thus the reason why a picture of him wasn't included in the update. I was also surprised how well the 350D coped with the noise, I always remember how horribly bad my previous cameras noise was. I'd never used this camera at ISO1600 so it was a nice surprise.

Just out of interest, did you try any slower shutter speeds on the cars at all? I've tried it in the past at indoor car shows and couldn't quite get the shutter speed or panning right. Also, did you take any full shots of the action, such as a picture where you can fully see the bike on top of Stig's buggy thing? Those would look very cool.

I did take some pictures with a slightly slower shutter speed, although not panning speed. The slower shutter speeds didn't really work to be honest, the lighting was difficult to work with as it was, thus the reason why I didn't get many of the actual action which makes me feel like a bit of a idiot. I did however get a couple of them, although they'll probably be posted at a later date. Anyway, thanks for the comments!

I know the feeling... not much activity here at the moment unfortunately. I have to say, I like the shots as well. Great effort with the long focal length as well. What lens where you using, is it an IS?

You already know I dig the lambo shot, I think you made great use of what little light you did have available on all the shots.

Yeah, even now it's still quiet. Thanks very much for the comments on the shots though means a lot especially seeing your shots in comparison! In answer to your question I was using my 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS. It worked remarkably well in the conditions, especially considering I hadn't got a clue what to do! Thanks again for your comment.

I see you are busy in this part of GTP. 👍

Lucky you...going to Top Gear live. Hope U enjoyed Adam:tup:

Thanks Nuno for dropping by, I know your not a usual around here but it's nice to see you and any comment is a comment at the end of the day! I really did enjoy MPH, and I wish I'd told you more about it befoe you set off to London so then you could have gone to the Earls Court one! Maybe next time? Thanks again for your comment!

Hope you enjoyed Top Gear live! That must have been awesome. In looking through your gallery, I am quite impressed. The Porsche model looks real! Great angle to it. Looking forward to more!

Cherrs Swiss Legend, as I said to Nuno I certainly enjoyed it and hope to show more at a later date. The Porsche model, as you may have gathered is my favourite model I own, even with the addition of a DBR9 recently. Hope you drop in more often!

______________________________-

Rockingham Stages '08

This was the first year I've been to the Rockingham Stages and wasn't quite sure what to expect. I knew I was going to need my long lens and some warm clothing but wasn't quite sure what the seating areas were going to be like or anything like that. So I was a bit confused. In all, it was a awesome day, it was very cold and quite wet (as the first few drivers on the stage found out!). Also I seemed to have a off day camera wise, whether it was I had completely forgotten GilesGutherie's advice which provided the alright panning shots from before or that I just couldn't think straight I don't know. Anyway, out of the 300 or 400 odd shots, most being at night only a couple were alright. I still haven't been through every single one but so far these two are my favourites.

3114322312_9980d1047e_o.jpg

Canon EOS 350D ISO200 1/60s at f/5.6
Focal Length: 208mm


This first shot is of a Sierra Cosworth, an excellent car on the day and my first shot of the day which was in focus! The car is a little bit un-sharp around the back end of the car but I think it provides a pretty decent effect. I was pleased with the composition of this as, I followed some of the advice. The car is placed towards the side of the frame with area infront of it creating a effect of space. As I said earlier, I didn't know what the conditions were going to be like. It was wet, cold, and dark before it actually got dark. This played havoc with the focussing.

3114321986_571119d780_o.jpg

Canon EOS 350D ISO200 1/20s at f/4.5
Focal Length: 90mm


This shot is of a Peugeot 306 Maxi Kit Car, as you can see it's at night. I've never done a panning shot at night before so this was a intresting experience. Yet again, I bumped up the ISO to get the shutter speed a little bit higher allowing me to actually capture the car in focus. The framing of this shot is different to the one above, as I've kind of reversed the whole thing. This time the car doesn't have much space infront of it, I'm personally not sure it's worked. So it'll be intresting to see your opinions on it.

Anyway, hope you guys don't mind my type up of my actual opinions of the shots. The rest of the MPH08 ones should be up soon-ish.

Enjoy.
 
Nice shots around MPH, I tried to get some in the main hall but I wasn't feeling the light much, it was kinda harsh in there.
I love all your shots though, wish I had the skills
 
Last edited:
Nice shots around MPH, I tried to get some in the main hall but I wasn't feeling the light much, it was kinda harsh in there.
I love all your shots though, wish I had the skills

Cheers, I know what you mean about MPH having somewhat difficult lighting conditions. I haven't yet posted any of my shots from the main hall, but I made a couple of mistakes when taking them i.e. accidently leaving the ISO at 1600. The key thing to conquering MPH's funny lighting is tweaking your white balance, I ended up using Tungsten to overpower the lights of the hall to provide better colours instead of ending up with orangy shots from using Auto W/B. Thanks for your comment, although I can assure you I'm not the best here infact far from it!
 
Great stage photos. The Cosworth photo's colours are very flat and grey, perhaps a little underexposed. It seems like that was just the kind of day it was though. Maybe any more exposure would've burned out the car's whites, so try to pull some more out of the background in Ps.

I really like the look of the second one. The composition doesn't help it though. You had the right idea in the first shot, but it was more important for this second one tog et the car coming into the center because those headlights are casting interesting light. This shot could also do with a little more saturation.

Good effort though 👍
 
Great stage photos. The Cosworth photo's colours are very flat and grey, perhaps a little underexposed. It seems like that was just the kind of day it was though. Maybe any more exposure would've burned out the car's whites, so try to pull some more out of the background in Ps.

I really like the look of the second one. The composition doesn't help it though. You had the right idea in the first shot, but it was more important for this second one to have the car coming into the center because those headlights are casting interesting light. This shot could also do with a little more saturation.

Good effort though 👍

Thanks for dropping by Exige, I think that the photo of the Cosworth was underexposed. I don't think the 1/60s shutter speed let enough light into the sensor to get the picture nicely exposed. I'll have a little play in photoshop at some point and get back to you though! Concerning the 306, as I said in the description I didn't think the composition worked something felt very un-natural to it. I mucked it up, I'm kicking myself for getting the composition wrong. I'll still have a little play with it in Photoshop as essential both of those shots apart from re-size are un-edited.

Hopefully, next year I'm planning to go to quite a few motorsport events to get away from exam stress etc. So hopefully I will just keep getting better and learning from my mistakes.

Anyway thanks for your comment, it's nice to actually have some activity going on here in the Photography Forums for once in a while.
 
Anything more than 1/60 would've been too long and ruined the sharpness you have on the car. You mentioned that the back of the car is losing focus already. This happens when you pivot your body for the pan, the points further from the focal point lose more and more detail as they are changing distance from your lens more than the focal point is. I'm sure if I had any sort of GIF making skills I could illustrate this.

Don't be afraid of using more than ISO200. NoiseNinja is a serious program that can repair a lot of noise damage, which allows you to get way more freedom in other exposure parameters. And although it is definitely taking a couple more steps ahead than you can handle, noise in night shots is perfectly acceptable when done properly. I've seen some great photos in EVO taken with gratuitous amounts of noise, but the photographer used it in a welcoming way. The trained eye also accepts the noise as natural in nighttime photography, it's sort of there as proof of a real photograph if that makes any sense.

And although I know the size of your photos is standard reduced to 600x400, this makes them seem sharp if they're that small. Don't let yourself fall into the trap of actually thinking this while shooting. Don't be lining something up and thinking "it'll look sharp enough at 600x400" because that's just sloppy. Aim for the best quality right off the camera.
 
Fancy Sierra...you really captured a great moment. So...now you a professional photographer?! 👍

Well done, Adam!!!
 
I really like both shots, the Cosworth photo captures the scene as it would look to the human eye as opposed to having an arty look to it, and I really like it.

The night time shot reminds me of a GT4 shot, the background blur is perfectly straight, I can never manage anything like that! I really need to get out there and practice moving car shots and panning, it's something I'm very bad at.
 
Anything more than 1/60 would've been too long and ruined the sharpness you have on the car. You mentioned that the back of the car is losing focus already. This happens when you pivot your body for the pan, the points further from the focal point lose more and more detail as they are changing distance from your lens more than the focal point is. I'm sure if I had any sort of GIF making skills I could illustrate this.

Yeah I understand what you mean about the focal point thing, the camera was telling me that it wanted a lower shutter speed so I did go against what it wanted which explains the underexposed look although should have upped the ISO perhaps a tadge more.

Don't be afraid of using more than ISO200. NoiseNinja is a serious program that can repair a lot of noise damage, which allows you to get way more freedom in other exposure parameters. And although it is definitely taking a couple more steps ahead than you can handle, noise in night shots is perfectly acceptable when done properly. I've seen some great photos in EVO taken with gratuitous amounts of noise, but the photographer used it in a welcoming way. The trained eye also accepts the noise as natural in nighttime photography, it's sort of there as proof of a real photograph if that makes any sense.

I think, if I recall correctly, at that time I was purely experimenting with different ISO's as I don't have much experience in dark/night photography so I suppose the best way to learn is to try new things! Some of the shots I did take with a higher ISO turned out actually significantly worse than that one which surprised me. I expected noise in the photo, as I got quite a bit of noise in my MPH photos as well so knew what was coming.

And although I know the size of your photos is standard reduced to 600x400, this makes them seem sharp if they're that small. Don't let yourself fall into the trap of actually thinking this while shooting. Don't be lining something up and thinking "it'll look sharp enough at 600x400" because that's just sloppy. Aim for the best quality right off the camera.


Don't worry, all the shots I post here I double check in Photoshop to see if there sharp. If there not sharp, or in focus or similar I bin them. I like to use my photos for my desktop and especially my most recent stuff is being used in coursework where I can't afford to have OOF or not sharp enough photos. I tend to sharpen them in Photoshop a little bit (not too excessive mind you). And I never think that about my shots, I want to get the best from my shots and learn to improve, if I stay in the mind set that everything will look fine at 600x400 then surely I wouldn't improve? It's like I've learnt not to trust my camera's small screen as it makes most photos look in focus when actually they aren't. Hopefully, I'll keep improving using helpful tips from people like you. Thanks again for your comment.

Fancy Sierra...you really captured a great moment. So...now you a professional photographer?! 👍

Well done, Adam!!!

Cheers NTX, I wish I was a professional photographer! However, I've said before I'm not the best around here just take a look at Exige's, Moglets, GilesGutheries and Syntax Errors gallery now they are people who could quite easily become professional photographers! I'm not quite to their standard yet! Thanks for dropping by!

I really like both shots, the Cosworth photo captures the scene as it would look to the human eye as opposed to having an arty look to it, and I really like it.

The night time shot reminds me of a GT4 shot, the background blur is perfectly straight, I can never manage anything like that! I really need to get out there and practice moving car shots and panning, it's something I'm very bad at.

Thanks for your comment Moglet, concerning the Cosworth I was actually worried that due to the fairly average view of it that it would look almost snap-shot like. Also the fact it's a fairly unusual angle to see a car, showing part of its roof, due to the grandstand seats to avoid the nasty fence! Glad to hear that you like it though :)

The 306, was to be honest a fairly lucky shot. I think the blur, as much as I hate taking things away from my photos was probably due to the IS on the lens doing its job properly. The lens I had fitted at the time (55-250mm IS f/4-5.6) had a actual, according to the instruction manual, auto-pan detection so it won't stop directly vertical/horizontal movement so I think it was probably the lens. Thanks again for your comment it's much appreciated!
 
Well it's been awhile, I haven't got any new material at the moment so I've been working on past stuff which hasn't been shown here yet. This shot is a Ford Escort Mk2 from the Richard Burns Memorial Rally I went to back in September of 2008, I've had some serious Photoshop work done on it. I don't tend to like overworking my photos in Photoshop, if there wrong then don't fix it bin it is my general thing. However, I liked this shot when I saw it and was upset at the fact I'd made a stupid mistake due to my framing. I thought that the shot had some action in it, and little things added together to make a fairly good shot; the smoke, the co-drivers reaction, the blur on the left hand wheel etc. I tried something new on this shot in Photoshop too, I tried a sepia kind of effect with the vignetting. I personally think it works, but would work better with a older car. Anyway, here it is.



Now as a comparison, here's the original. As you can see, there might have been a cone in the way...



As you can now probably see, my clone/heal tool/every other tool possible hasn't worked entirely well either.

Enjoy.
 
Last edited:
Very nicely fixed. The new warmer tones work well with it too…

Thanks very much! I agree about the tones too, it just seems to suit the overall picture. My only major gripe is due to the Subaru parked in the background ruins the "feel" to the shot.

Thats a very good fix, how long did it take if you don't mind saying?

Thanks, the fix took around half an hour. Although if you include the time of which I practised on some other shots with the same probelm then it's probably about 1 and a half hours. I've done work like this before when I was at my summer job where removing things was a fairly regular occurence so learning how to deal with it was important!

Great stuff, just a slight bit too much vignetting. I'm bad at that too, but it makes for a cleaner, more pure photograph.

Thanks so much! I'm rubbish at vignetting usually, I only tried it on this picture as I feel as though it suited it. I must find a better technique to do vignetting in Photoshop, the ones I've found just don't work...Thanks again for the comment!
 
Well it's been awhile, I haven't got any new material at the moment so I've been working on past stuff which hasn't been shown here yet. This shot is a Ford Escort Mk2 from the Richard Burns Memorial Rally I went to back in September of 2008, I've had some serious Photoshop work done on it. I don't tend to like overworking my photos in Photoshop, if there wrong then don't fix it bin it is my general thing. However, I liked this shot when I saw it and was upset at the fact I'd made a stupid mistake due to my framing. I thought that the shot had some action in it, and little things added together to make a fairly good shot; the smoke, the co-drivers reaction, the blur on the left hand wheel etc. I tried something new on this shot in Photoshop too, I tried a sepia kind of effect with the vignetting. I personally think it works, but would work better with a older car. Anyway, here it is.



Now as a comparison, here's the original. As you can see, there might have been a cone in the way...



As you can now probably see, my clone/heal tool/every other tool possible hasn't worked entirely well either.

Enjoy.

Like the bottom one. The top one is a bit too miserable.:sly:
 
Right then, thanks for all your comments on the cone shot, its much appreciated. Moving swiftly onwards, I've finally taken some pictures this year. Last Saturday I finally finished my light box and decided to give it a whirl and see what I could produce. It's a right old mixture of suff, infact a bit too much compared to what I usually put up. But there are some intresting experiments in there which I'm keen to hear your opinion and own ideas on. Especially the different lighting effects. Anyway I hope you enjoy them.


















Enjoy!
 
A wand or a lot of filler flash is very common in night-time or low light automotive photography, but it is just used to light up the vehicle and the actual streaking is edited out. Take a look at what that last Porsche shot looks like without the white streaking behind it. If you would've gotten more light on the car, it would turn out very clean.

The DB9 'vert is spot on though, best of the bunch by miles ( or is it yards if it's 1:18? :P)
 
A wand or a lot of filler flash is very common in night-time or low light automotive photography, but it is just used to light up the vehicle and the actual streaking is edited out. Take a look at what that last Porsche shot looks like without the white streaking behind it. If you would've gotten more light on the car, it would turn out very clean.

The DB9 'vert is spot on though, best of the bunch by miles ( or is it yards if it's 1:18? :P)

Thanks for dropping by Exige, I was mainly using the streak thing to just give a intresting effect. It never occured to me that I could, or even would want to edit it out. Now bearing that in mind I think your right by saying the last one would be pretty sweet, especially if that front panel was lit up more. I was really pleased with the DB9 shot, I just thought it was a intresting angle and the colours seem to be pretty good too. Thanks for your comments!
 
Your model cars (and bikes) photos are so good looking, love the pro look of them Adam:tup:

The Porsche pics, no words need no describe how cool/awesome it looks:tup:

NTX
 
I love both GT3RS shots that you played with the flashlight
Exige is right about removing streaking lights. I bet it would look so much professional.
Awesome work 👍
 
I love both GT3RS shots that you played with the flashlight
Exige is right about removing streaking lights. I bet it would look so much professional.
Awesome work 👍

Cheers Franz, I had a play last night with that last GT3RS shot and removed the streak and it came out looking pretty cool. As I've said earlier it's a shame there isn't really enough light on the front of the car to make the shot look just a bit cooler. It'll have to be something to experiment with next time I get the studio out. Thanks for dropping by!
 
As part of my Art coursework I had to take some landscape photographs, as you may have noticed I don't do these very often. So it's been quite a steep learning curve, even if I'm still not particularly good. Theres this place near me called Kirkstead Abbey, I went to take some pictures mainly of the ruins but ended up taking this shot. I think this was a case of being their at the right time and place for once. I'm quite pleased with this, although I would have preferred it if there was more of a focal point but I think the sky alone makes up for this.



Enjoy
 

Latest Posts

Back