- 8,100
- Guelph, Ontario
Or perhaps Daytona.
No, just no.
The oval has a lot of history but it's still an oval. And the road course is just a few simple turns with no elevation changes.
Or perhaps Daytona.
This is why I love most of the tracks I do.
City circuits with large elevation changes, rally stages with large elevation changes... I find them fun.
History is only great for paid racing drivers, IMHO. A privateer with no chance of even entering Daytona 500 or 24h would hardly enjoy it as much as nearby Barber Motorsports park, with its undulating curves and weightless moments. Chip Ganassi would probably say Indy/Daytona are the greatest tracks... But for us somewhat normal people, with our slow cars... Nope
Like all those privateers in the GTD class that have no chance of entering the 24 Hours?A privateer with no chance of even entering Daytona 500 or 24h would hardly enjoy it...
Kinda why I specified that privateers who can't afford either race wouldn't enjoy it.I think if you actually got the chance to compete in one of these great events you'd be enjoying it. If in 4 years time I was in the Daytona 500 i'd kinda rate that above pretty much anything else.
Kinda why I specified that privateers who can't afford either race wouldn't enjoy it.
If I could choose between a 300 hp rally car, and a 300 hp endurance car to drive at Daytona, but couldn't afford both, I'd take the rally car. If I were being paid to drive a Daytona Prototype, I would go to Daytona.
Matching a car to a track is important. Trying to take an LMP1 car around the Isle of Mann TT course would be too unnerving, while taking a 300 hp car to Daytona (especially the oval) probably wouldn't be exciting.
@Bopop4 aluded to this. I backed up both sides.
Going to Hastings County isn't about setting foot on hallowed ground, but kissing the bricks at the Brickyard (as disgusting as it is,) is all about not even feeling real... It would feel like a dream.
One is just about a bit of fun sliding around in a rally car, and the other is about being immortalized forever as a champion of such a prestigious event.
TL;DR, to each their own, to each car its own perfect track.
Clarify: it's a racing venue/route, so how is it not?And back on topic, a rally route really does not count as a track.
No, just no.
The oval has a lot of history but it's still an oval. And the road course is just a few simple turns with no elevation changes.
while taking a 300 hp car to Daytona (especially the oval) probably wouldn't be exciting.
@Bopop4 aluded to this. I backed up both sides.
Sadly the oval is more fun to watch than the road course. Neither are the best track.
Yeah, but that also might be in part from the series.
I don't find endurance racing exciting regardless of track.
Give the road course a few sprint races and it'll put on a much better show.
Doesn't compare in which way?Touring cars at Daytona is fun. But, I mean, for track days and time attack and other grassroots motorsports, it doesn't compare - you're right about that.
It's not just that, I've seen a few different groups over several years race their. The problem is that as you put it the track doesn't have much variation, the road course is tight and not extremely easy or given much passing area until you get to the (ironically) oval portion of it. Even coming off the Tri-Oval into the first kink/heavy braking turn you have a passing area, but after that it's much follow the leader.
What Corvette said. It's rare that we agree, so there is obviously an element of truth for us to actually agree on something...Doesn't compare in which way?