Joey D
Premium
- 47,207
- Boyne Falls, MI
- GTP_Joey
- GTP Joey
Victoria had a secret son
So you mean to tell me Victoria's secret wasn't sexy lingerie but a son?
Victoria had a secret son
Thanks for the mental picture of the dour-faced old empress in scanty undies.So you mean to tell me Victoria's secret wasn't sexy lingerie but a son?
So you mean to tell me Victoria's secret wasn't sexy lingerie but a son?
If Zuckerberg wasn't on the list before he certainly will be now...Well that's exactly what they would do! I think.
Yay! They should never have been permitted to leave the basement.
QAnon is a conspiracy theory that grew out of the fringes of the internet and posits that high-profile Democrats and Hollywood celebrities are members of a child-eating cabal that is being secretly taken down by President Donald Trump, and that members of this fictitious cabal will soon be marched to their execution.
Is this evidence of a conspiracy ?
Short answer: no.
However, the Professor does not wish to disclose the journals’ reasoning.
“We cannot start discussing what they are dissatisfied with, because in that case we must also explain what the study showed – and we do not want to discuss that until it is published,” explains Christian Torp-Pedersen.
Possibly, but that means they all immediately quarantine together in the house. That's why they have continuously said if you've been in contact with a person who tested positive, you need to quarantine yourself out of precaution.If one person has it in the house, will a lock-down mean that everyone in the house will get it? {Just a thought trying to get into a box}
Am I? Or are you prejudging ?
“We cannot start discussing what they are dissatisfied with, because in that case we must also explain what the study showed – and we do not want to discuss that until it is published,” explains Christian Torp-Pedersen.
In the absence of any further information my own personal conspiracy theory is that their methodology was so out of whack that they couldn't find anyone else to publish or agree with their results, so they decided to kick up a stink in the hope that the conspiracy crowd would publicise their findings for them.This is BS. It's 2020, not 1440. You don't even need a printing press to publish any more, thanks to computers. You do not need to have your paper published in a large journal if you think it important that it's results are widely available. And pre-prints are absolutely a thing that many researchers do, and has been common for decades.
The only conspiracy here is why the authors of the study are choosing to withhold the results. Possibly because the story around a mask study paper being rejected by major journals is more engaging than the actual results of the study, and it at least gets the name of their sponsor out there and circulating. Lots more mentions of Salling Foundations and their charitable works this way than if they'd published a bad or inconclusive paper in an open source journal.
If they had something that they thought was genuinely going to save lives, then they would have published openly at the first sign of pushback from the major journals. It's not like the major journals pay anything for the privilege of publishing in them.
I haven't made any judgement because I don't have the facts of the paper or the facts of the journals' rebuttals. And nor do you, but you posted a lot of detail in the Conspiracies thread, an action which speaks for itself.
Where did he say that?You've judged that the paper was rejected for valid reasons. How do you know that is true?
You've judged that the paper was rejected for valid reasons.
You've judged that the paper was rejected for valid reasons. How do you know that is true?
The facts are that the report isn't being printed
the conspiracy theory is that it goes against the current, Is this the Conspiracy Theory thread or not? If this were the Conspiracy Facts thread then you may have a point.
Am I? Or are you prejudging ?
You've judged that the paper was rejected for valid reasons.
Printing is super easy. I've already printed on two separate occasions this morning. It's 8:49am. I figure I printed on at least a dozen separate occasions since you posted that. I don't know how many for certain because it's so easy that I tend to not track it that closely.The facts are that the report isn't being printed...
The facts are that the report isn't being printed, the conspiracy theory is that it goes against the current, Is this the Conspiracy Theory thread or not? If this were the Conspiracy Facts thread then you may have a point.
They have an agenda
To wit, Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds (a Republican) was actually speaking the truth when she said the other day that there is "science on both sides" of the mask debate. Reynolds, however, still went ahead with imposing a new mask mandate in her state, along with other measures, as COVID-19 cases surge across the country, with the Midwest as the hardest-hit region.
"There's science on both sides and you know that," she said, without providing details. "If you look, you can find whatever you want to support wherever you're at."
The outlet noted that her comments appeared to conflict with the recommendations of public health experts.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-...y-claims-theres-science-on-both-sides-of-maskReynolds was later asked to clarify her remarks about face masks and said that there are "different studies on both" sides.
"They are effective. I'm not saying they're not. It's part of the layered mitigation efforts that we've put in place," she said. "I'm encouraging people to use them, especially if you can't social distance."