The Tuning Garage!
- Thread starter boombexus
- 36 comments
- 1,105 views
Originally posted by Pako!
Sorry, just lerking around a bit and thought I'd share these F-1 settings if anyone wants to check them out, that is, if you have any F-1 challenges...
front rear
spring rate = 20 20
ride height = 55 55
damper b = 10 10
damper re = 10 10
camber an = 1.0 0.0
toe angle = 0.0 0.0
brake bal = 7 7
lsd initial = 0 5
lsd accel = 0 10
lsd decre = 0 5
auto setting = 37 or 38
downforce = 1.00 1.50
asm = 0
tcs = 2
Race On....
Sorry, just lerking around a bit and thought I'd share these F-1 settings if anyone wants to check them out, that is, if you have any F-1 challenges...
front rear
spring rate = 20 20
ride height = 55 55
damper b = 10 10
damper re = 10 10
camber an = 1.0 0.0
toe angle = 0.0 0.0
brake bal = 7 7
lsd initial = 0 5
lsd accel = 0 10
lsd decre = 0 5
auto setting = 37 or 38
downforce = 1.00 1.50
asm = 0
tcs = 2
Race On....
- 10,081
- WFG9
What about cars with both a front and rear diff, Zero?
- 10,081
- WFG9
I altered the name a bit to better differentiate it from the replays thread.
- 10,081
- WFG9
Umm, the word garage is synonymous with storage. i just thought that since in this case garage refers to tuning it might be better to rename it. hell, no skin off my back. i can rename it. just say the word. but i'm going off the comp very soon.
Race Idiot
(Banned)
- 11,439
- Sao Tome and Principe
I wonder if that setup will work on the Poly 001?
Hmm ive got some settings for my Ford Escort Rally car I wouldnt mind someone trying to help me with. BTW these are to make it handle on tarmac, not dirt, the car keeps shredding the tyres at a horrendus rate. I would post the settings but I have timesplitters running. Ill post em in a sec.
Hmm ive got some settings for my Ford Escort Rally car I wouldnt mind someone trying to help me with. BTW these are to make it handle on tarmac, not dirt, the car keeps shredding the tyres at a horrendus rate. I would post the settings but I have timesplitters running. Ill post em in a sec.
Race Idiot
(Banned)
- 11,439
- Sao Tome and Principe
Stop ford hating, this particular ford won the WRC so shove it. Its also kicking the JGTC cars arses.
I have about5 Poly001 I got bored of them after running the F1 series. I think thats about the only time I used an F1.
I have about5 Poly001 I got bored of them after running the F1 series. I think thats about the only time I used an F1.
Race Idiot
(Banned)
- 11,439
- Sao Tome and Principe
Ok will do that 
- 10,081
- WFG9
i need good settings for the 787b at monaco.
- 10,081
- WFG9
Not if you are impatient and not good at it.
- 10,081
- WFG9
I've learned 2 things.
1 move the df 1 point and the car needs an extra mile to turns
2 the more you move the rear camber to the right the sharper it turns; reverse for the front. though stability might be compromised.
1 move the df 1 point and the car needs an extra mile to turns
2 the more you move the rear camber to the right the sharper it turns; reverse for the front. though stability might be compromised.
:fdevil: Muahahahahahahahah! :fdevil:
Ok T, below are the settings that "I think" I used for Zero's race series with the 787 @ Monoco. But I'm not making any guarantees.
9.4/11.0
55/55
6/6
6/6
2.5/1.0
-0.5/-1.0
4/5
24/15
5/20/5
4.444
31
1.00/1.25
ASM: 0
TCS: 1
Enjoy.
- 10,081
- WFG9
braking is bad.
- 10,081
- WFG9
Not working for me, the car is sluggish at slow speeds, heavy steering needed.
That is a set up for heavy steering. The responsiveness of those settings is nill. 
Hmmmm, the brake setting that I used is so that the cars tail end wont get loose in hard braking. You can raise the rear brake balance if you want.
Raise the shocks bound and rebound to:
bound: 8/8
rebound: 10/10
Springs take up a few notches.
But these changes will make the car more responsive.
Hmmmm, the brake setting that I used is so that the cars tail end wont get loose in hard braking. You can raise the rear brake balance if you want.
Raise the shocks bound and rebound to:
bound: 8/8
rebound: 10/10
Springs take up a few notches.
But these changes will make the car more responsive.
- 4,473
Can anyone help me with learning how to tune a little more? Im good when it comes to the autoset and rideheight but the rest is just T&E. Can anyone give me some tips?
- 4,473
Suspension and indiviual gears.......
- 10,081
- WFG9
Quote me on nothing.
Low damping is good for uneven surfaces but may be spongy, which i assume hurts out of corner traction and such. High damping can be more responsive but can be so stiff as to cause jolting on landing.
No one understands toe, it's never consistant. Ok, it might be but I don't know it well enough.
More rear camber and less front seems to help cars turn in tighter, however, more front camber seems to aid stability. I assume less rear camber reduces rear stability.
Low ride heights: good for downforce, speed. High ride heights: good for looseness, but hurts cornering due to lift and reduced speed. Low/high, f/r: oversteer. High/low, f/r: understeer.
Low stab. settings: more body role but a looser turn in.
High stab. settings: less body roll but a tighter turn in. Advantages and disadvantages depend on corner. High/low: understeer. Low/high: oversteer.
Gearing seems largely theoretical. I think many people opt to have 1st and second as short gears and the remaning gears spread out. Generally you want the gears to not go significantly out of the effective power range for the speed. At lower speeds of around 75 to 100 or below, you'd want the after shift rpm to fall near the torque peak, as torque is more important at this stage. For high speeds you want the tach to stay in the high hp range, but to not go back so little that you redline early.
I'll let others comment now.
Low damping is good for uneven surfaces but may be spongy, which i assume hurts out of corner traction and such. High damping can be more responsive but can be so stiff as to cause jolting on landing.
No one understands toe, it's never consistant. Ok, it might be but I don't know it well enough.
More rear camber and less front seems to help cars turn in tighter, however, more front camber seems to aid stability. I assume less rear camber reduces rear stability.
Low ride heights: good for downforce, speed. High ride heights: good for looseness, but hurts cornering due to lift and reduced speed. Low/high, f/r: oversteer. High/low, f/r: understeer.
Low stab. settings: more body role but a looser turn in.
High stab. settings: less body roll but a tighter turn in. Advantages and disadvantages depend on corner. High/low: understeer. Low/high: oversteer.
Gearing seems largely theoretical. I think many people opt to have 1st and second as short gears and the remaning gears spread out. Generally you want the gears to not go significantly out of the effective power range for the speed. At lower speeds of around 75 to 100 or below, you'd want the after shift rpm to fall near the torque peak, as torque is more important at this stage. For high speeds you want the tach to stay in the high hp range, but to not go back so little that you redline early.
I'll let others comment now.
Similar threads
Latest Posts
-
Gran Turismo 7 Update 1.61 is Coming Next Week, With Three New Cars
- Latest: Mike Hamilton
-
-
-
-
