Amar wrote 20 tracks 60 layouts..But website 60 tracks
Now feel free to jumble those two numbers around and add them together, or even multiply them to get whatever result you want : D
But 20 tracks is not enough! It will mean that they leave 30 GT4 tracks out of the game. 👎
What are you saying?
Or not.
Over 20 courses.
Important adjective that...![]()
What are you saying?
Agreed.
But if we really get a track editor (a good one) i dont care.![]()
Well, it sertainly means under 30.That it's not just 20, but over 20. Meaning it coul dbe any number. KY did not say an exact number. But that will surely come in the coming weeks at TGS.![]()
Dijital Majikpeople keep forgetting it was written MORE THAN 20 Courses and MORE THAN 60 Layouts, which could theoretically mean 100000 tracks and 1000000000000 variations. My personal view is it's an attempt to hide the actual number, but still give info that would no doubt be asked for.
Oh lord...This
I don't know, Amar seemed convincing with this post in response to that.We won't. KY confirmed in an interview with IGN a day or so ago that there will not be a track edit/build feature in GT5.
Could it possibly mean 20 new tracks and 60 from previous games?
In my opinion, its is ... questionable to argue that anyone would say "more than 20 tracks" when it actually is 100. Technically, of course 100 is "more than 20" and therefore correct, by why wouldn't they say "100 tracks" in the first place?
On the other hand, seriously proposing that GT5 will only feature 20 and a few tracks is questionable as well. I am aware that all tracks had to be re-modeled in HD for the game, but just by looking at how many tracks we have in Prologue, 20 would be ridiculous.
Now, I won't have a guess at how many tracks we will see (because it would just be a guess), but I would bet money it will be much more than 20. I think that this question, just as the one with the number of cars and their features, is a problem of phrasing and translation.
In my opinion, its is ... questionable to argue that anyone would say "more than 20 tracks" when it actually is 100. Technically, of course 100 is "more than 20" and therefore correct, by why wouldn't they say "100 tracks" in the first place?
👍👍👍In my opinion, its is ... questionable to argue that anyone would say "more than 20 tracks" when it actually is 100. Technically, of course 100 is "more than 20" and therefore correct, by why wouldn't they say "100 tracks" in the first place?
On the other hand, seriously proposing that GT5 will only feature 20 and a few tracks is questionable as well. I am aware that all tracks had to be re-modeled in HD for the game, but just by looking at how many tracks we have in Prologue, 20 would be ridiculous.
Now, I won't have a guess at how many tracks we will see (because it would just be a guess), but I would bet money it will be much more than 20. I think that this question, just as the one with the number of cars and their features, is a problem of phrasing and translation.
If 20 is correct then PD have got this completely the wrong way round for my tastes. I'd take a game with 64 cars and 100 tracks over one with 20 tracks and 1000 cars every time.