If you saw one in real life you would see how luxurious they are with everything you could want inside. Two seats makes it not luxury? Better tell just about every car manufacturer out there with the exception of Rolls Royce that 2 seats = roughin' it.
Every manufacturer? Most do not make luxury cars and those that do generally make them nice and roomy to seat at least 4 adults comfortably. Some of those luxury car makers also make sports cars but there is a difference between a sports car and a luxury car and the few attempts at a luxury sports car fall a bit short in that they are either not much in terms of comfort or not much in terms of performance.
I wonder which race that would be? Most of the races, make that all of the races on the ring were fairly easy from my point of view, even the one that some people on here were calling impossible I was able to win on the first try without tuning the car. I'm sure I could win with the Veyron on that track but I would not want to, I could easily beat the Veyron with a lesser car and enjoy it more.
Not interested and my friends are pretty quick in an LMP some of them don't drive anything but and the Veyron would not stand a snowballs chance on any track other than SSX.
That's it? Luxury doesn't just mean four seats. Like it or not, it does have very high class & comfortable interior. Yes, it's known for it's power and speed. But it's also known for it's comfort and easiness for daily use. It's a car of status. It's numbers and simply a tech marvel.
No luxury does not mean seating for 4 but that sure helps. One of the main things a luxury car needs is a very comfortable ride which I kind of doubt the Veyron has. When you look up a listing for a Veyron it is described as a "sports car" not as a luxury car, I would imagine that it has a stiff ride and not all that comfortable to ride in, especially when you have to stop for gas every few minutes
When you say a big, heavy, expensive eye sore im not sure if this is about the veyron or my ex. Both arent very comfortable rides either!No luxury does not mean seating for 4 but that sure helps. One of the main things a luxury car needs is a very comfortable ride which I kind of doubt the Veyron has. When you look up a listing for a Veyron it is described as a "sports car" not as a luxury car, I would imagine that it has a stiff ride and not all that comfortable to ride in, especially when you have to stop for gas every few minutes
In the end it doesn't matter if they call it luxury or not, it is simply a big, heavy, poor handling, very fast in a straight line, very expensive eye sore
Obviously you haven't seen many car reviews… Watch the original Top Gear Veyron race on StreetFire or something, JC makes all sorts of comments on how the thing somehow manages to be massively fast and massively comfortable at the same time. It isn't the quickest, it can easily be beaten by Konnigseggs (however you go about spelling it) nowadays, but at those high speeds, everyone comments at how the car really feels it's at it's limit and is about to explode at any time - this just doesn't exist in the Veyron. May was going 240+ MPH in the stripped-down SS version and still made that statement.No luxury does not mean seating for 4 but that sure helps. One of the main things a luxury car needs is a very comfortable ride which I kind of doubt the Veyron has. When you look up a listing for a Veyron it is described as a "sports car" not as a luxury car, I would imagine that it has a stiff ride and not all that comfortable to ride in, especially when you have to stop for gas every few minutes
In the end it doesn't matter if they call it luxury or not, it is simply a big, heavy, poor handling, very fast in a straight line, very expensive eye sore
Well maybe that episode doesn't quite summarize it… Top Gear openly admits over time that The BV is just way too heavy for a track car, so it isn't really the ultimate racing machine. But it is quite apparent that it is one of the greatest driving machines out there - it's more of a luxury sports car hybrid than anything else. The Bugatti wasn't designed for lap times, it was made purely to make (seemingly) impossible specs… possible. And it did. 1000HP, fastest production car top speed, and somehow includes an excellent ride and interior. That's why it costs VW at least 5 times more to build than to sell.
However accurate or amusing that statement may be, all it does is potentially ignite an extended and pointless argument.That's the sort of answer I get from my 10 year old daughter...
What's your point? My point is that F1 cars are inhibited by their downforce, which at full speed effectively makes them weigh more than the Veyron. Also F1 engines are tiny for their power output and have ridiculously low torque. F1 cars are about high g-force bends and stupid stopping distances. Comparing the Veyron to an F1 car is like comparing Concorde to a Tornado.
So by reading this post. You've considered yourself heavily opinionated without any knowledge,and without the will to learn beyond what you've experienced in a video game simulator?No luxury does not mean seating for 4 but that sure helps. One of the main things a luxury car needs is a very comfortable ride which I kind of doubt the Veyron has. When you look up a listing for a Veyron it is described as a "sports car" not as a luxury car, I would imagine that it has a stiff ride and not all that comfortable to ride in, especially when you have to stop for gas every few minutes
In the end it doesn't matter if they call it luxury or not, it is simply a big, heavy, poor handling, very fast in a straight line, very expensive eye sore
So by reading this post. You've considered yourself heavily opinionated without any knowledge,and without the will to learn beyond what you've experienced in a video game simulator?
Every car with two doors is generally classified as a "Sports Car". Everything with two doors.
You should stop. This thread is pretty pointless now.
