Whincup freaking slowed up what a....
Yep, I stopped recording. I'll watch the last 15minutes.
He does have a point - the hard acceleration came at the right time, but looking at the replays, a gap starts to form between Kelly and Whincup before van Gisbergen and Kelly hit the acceleration zone. Clearly, they accelerated at some point.
Perhaps a better way of phrasing it would be to say that the visual evidence would have been enough to warrant further investigation. I'm sure the stewards have access to telemetry, and telemetry does not lie; if it showed either van Gisbergen or Kelly going over 60km/h before the acceleration zone, then they are done for.
I was replying to R1600 Turbo, who was quoting Damian White, one of the race directors.
When a race director uses the word assume, it's hard to take them seriously.I was replying to R1600 Turbo, who was quoting Damian White, one of the race directors.
When the first two went, maybe everyone else jumped and Whincup was tardy causing the baulk...In other words you can't answer what I've said, since the same replay also shows that he was nearly ran into the back of.
When the first two went, maybe everyone else jumped and Whincup was tardy causing the baulk...
Gee, rules violation for the #1 car. Bet nothing is done about it.