What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,282 comments
  • 572,106 views


Skyline (Colin Strause, Greg Strause, 2010) -- Boy, this movie was bad. Jarrod and his pregnant girlfriend travel to Los Angeles to meet his old friend and successful entrepreneur Terry. Next morning, the group is awakened by mysterious beams of blue light. The group of friends try to escape from the alien invaders, but while doing so manage to take a nap and quit smoking. This is a movie to watch for the special effects, and while they are very good at times, at others they completely suck, keeping in with the movie's inconsistencies and an ending that will really make it obvious that these guys were making things up as the movie went on. 2.5/10
 
Sucker-Punch-Movie-Poster1.jpg


This movie was MUCH better than I expected. Excellent special effects and the fight scenes with the females was just awesome. Some female fight scenes in movies just looks terrible like in Bloodrayne but dang they made these girls kick some serious butt. Storyline was a bit strange but still well worth watching and looked great in Blu Ray. 👍

Sucker Punch 👎👍

I hated this movie. I also hated avatar. Sucker Punch, just like avatar, has crap for a plot. Unfortunately sucker punch, just like avatar, does have a redeeming quality, excellent imagery (thus the one thumb up).

Let's start with the good - good looking chicks (particularly the main chick) fighting all kinds of bizarre things in bizarre settings with various weapons. The imagery was excellent. And it really was as though a producer sat down with some writers and said the following.

Producer: Ok here's the scene. I want a blonde pig-tailed girl in a school girl outfit riding on top of a fire breathing dragon putting a samurai sword through its head. Write something that lets us do that scene.

Writers: A school girl outfit with a samarai sword and a dragon? That's not going to...

Producer: Or World War II blimps, whatever **** you.

The good part is that the writers delivered. They put together a story that actually motivates the existence of a blonde japanese schoolgirl putting a sword through the head of a samurai warrior with a bazooka.... hard as that is to believe. And so we get to see those scenes, and they're good - quite visually stunning (although the slo-mo was a bit overdone).

The bad part is that the writers were not interested in an action movie of any sort, and had no idea who their audience was or what they went to the movie to see. They decided that we needed a movie about the emotional angst of an abused teenager from a broken home who gets unrealistically railroaded by society. So in between scenes of her flying through the air in her skirt with a machine gun or slicing a robot in half with a sword, we have to put up with scenes that destroy everything that the action creates.

The movie was clearly called sucker punch because it's what the writers do to the audience over and over again. Just when you're enjoying the movie, they punch you in the gut with a terrible movie you had no interest in watching. You find yourself waiting through the stupidity for the next action scene.

I recommend watching this movie, but I'd recommend fast forwarding it to the action scenes. The rest of the film only detracts.
 


Mean Streets (Martin Scorsese, 1973) -- A view on a few weeks in the life of two starting out guys in the tribulations of New York city's Little Italy. For one of them, the future is less clearly defined. A small-time hood, he works for his uncle, making collections and reclaiming bad debts. He's probably too nice to succeed. The other is a near psychotic whose trouble-making threatens everyone around them. A failed attempt to escape (to Brooklyn) moves them all a step closer to a bitter, almost preordained future.

Here's a great movie starring Harvey Keitel and Robert De Niro, about the values and differences between people, friendship and reality. Given all the greatness of other Scorsese/De Niro movies, it's no wonder this movie's been overshadowed, but honestly it's just as good as Casino or Goodfellas; maybe a bit more rough around the edges and with a low-budget feel, with a thinner plot, but the acting and tension of the scenes is done perfectly. You can see in this movie where directors such as Boyle or Tarantino got their influences. 8/10
 
Watching the third Transformers movie and it kind of sucks lol. Too little action and too much talking and trying to make the characters funny. Witwicky's mom and dad are so annoying lol. Hopefully the ending is better than the first two thirds of the movie..
 


Thor (Kenneth Branagh, 2011) -- The powerful but arrogant warrior Thor is cast out of the fantastic realm of Asgard and sent to live amongst humans on Earth, where he soon becomes one of their finest defenders. I've always been a distant fan of Thor since he's the only one capable of defeating Hulk (theoretically) and that's a lot to say. What has me not liking the movie so much is just part of my comic book fan-ology in which, though the heroes are thought-out characters that act in this or that way because it's the way they are and everything that comes from developing a characters throughout the years; when making the movie, it all sort of falls in a 2-hour time period. And while it's not a major issue with this movie, it's commonplace with all superheo movies. With that said, Thor was much better than I expected, especially because since plans for The Avengers rised up, it became apparent that a lot of independent superhero movies had to be done soon to give each character a decent background, and I though that would be an issue with this one, I'm surprised they could strike a decent balance between Norse mythology and the real work in the Marvel universe. Both actors who play Thor and Loki are convincing enough and make a good impression of the characters they portray, and Anthony Hopkins and Natalie Portman bring a good balance to the mix to bring out the relative unknowns. As I said, this movie is just pop-corn epic superhero movie, but it's a fun adaptation cut above the usual fare. 6/10



Green Lantern (Martin Campbell, 2011) -- A test pilot is granted a mystical green ring that bestows him with otherworldly powers, as well as membership into an intergalactic squadron tasked with keeping peace within the universe. And while I've usually been more of a DC (actually, Vertigo) fan than Marvel... I have to hand it to Marvel above over this one. Especially because this one more or less assumed the viewer knew everything beforehand and just wanted to be given an example of what it would be like in a movie. While both stories go from the start, this one acts on too many assumptions and rely too much on Ryan Reynold's asshattedness in an effort to make him fun. While Thor is a pop-corn movie that I enjoyed, Green Lantern is just another summer flick, and while both terms may seem interchangeable, I think there's a bit more to it, especially when you take into account all the other titles from both sides of the comic spectrum; inevitable, Thor is going to be compared to Spider-Man, Iron Man, Hulk, Wolverine and others, and to be honest, it fares well enough. Green Lantern is going to be compared to other DC comic remakes, and that's mainly Superman and The Dark Knight, which is hard to top and whatever comes after it should at least be comparable. Overall Green Lantern was a fun movie that apparently needed to be 3D'd to be more appealing. I would skip that, but to each its own. 5/10



In Bruges (Martin McDonagh, 2008) -- Holed up in Bruges, Belgium after a difficult job, two hit men begin to differ on their views of life and death as they become used to local customs. While the movie is shown as a black comedy and as such it works quite well, as you watch it, you might take in a few cues that will point you into another direction... one in which Bruges might be a sort of Purgatory. because the script is so brilliantly written, the movie ends up being two movies at once, in which you can take in any which of these plots. The smallest characters become the important ones and the central ones become just part of the scenery. Just when you think you have the movie figured out, in comes a new set of situations that turn it all around. Impressive dialogues and very smart scenes make this debut movie a keeper. While the ending might be a bit more grim than the rest of the movie is, depends entirely up to you and what approach you took while watching the movie. But tha way everything ties together makes it worth it. 8.5/10
 
This isn't the review thread, Tom's (and others) posts are a nice read but you can leave the subtle sarcasm.

On topic: saw "The Great Escape" yesterday, can't remember how long that's been.
 
This isn't the review thread, Tom's (and others) posts are a nice read but you can leave the subtle sarcasm.

This has unofficially become the review thread, since there really isn't a review thread per se. I'd think if anyone's seen a movie recently they can at least say if it was bad or good. The reviews I put on here are also on my blog, but I'll have to agree with Dan and his subtle sarcasm in the fact that people should at least say what they thought of the movie... but hey, that's just me and I'm not about to set rules on page 292.
 
This has unofficially become the review thread, since there really isn't a review thread per se. I'd think if anyone's seen a movie recently they can at least say if it was bad or good. The reviews I put on here are also on my blog, but I'll have to agree with Dan and his subtle sarcasm in the fact that people should at least say what they thought of the movie... but hey, that's just me and I'm not about to set rules on page 292.
The thread title kinda gives it away, maybe someone should change it atleast.
My post wasn't aimed at you, it's good to read trough them when I've got the time but I don't expect everyone to do similar, as you said maybe just a 👍 or 👎 would do.

Btw: I don't like sarcasm :sly:
 
The thread title kinda gives it away, maybe someone should change it atleast.
My post wasn't aimed at you, it's good to read trough them when I've got the time but I don't expect everyone to do similar, as you said maybe just a 👍 or 👎 would do.

Btw: I don't like sarcasm :sly:

Oh yeah, sorry if it sounded like I was nitpicking your post. Not intended.

Kudos to whoever changed the thread title. Respeck!
 
Kudos to whoever changed the thread title. Respeck!
I can die happy now. :O

The last movie I attempted to watch was:

mv5bmtkzmjcwntqynv5bml5.jpg

2010: Moby Dick.

Being another Asylum flick, I do not expect much. And that's exactly what I got - not much. Just a few short minutes in, the captain (not Ahab, he comes later) says they're about to enter Soviet waters when we've been told that they're already 50 miles in. Fast forward ~20 minutes (aka 2 minutes before I shut it off) and Captain Ahab (there he is!) says that they're going after Moby Dick. The entire crew perks up and looks agitated. "Oh. You've heard of Moby Dick?" "Any one who has spent time on the water has heard of Moby Dick."

Then how the hell do you not know that the captain of your sub is the guy who's hunting the beast. :rolleyes:

*click*

I'd spoiler tag but no one cares. :p
 
Cars 2.

Not as funny as the first one, but still, if you're a petrol head, pretty good to watch.
 
Saw Troll Hunter the other day. Someone compared it to Blair Witch Project and I'd agree with that. I thought it was pretty good actually. Unlike BWP, this movie actually showed the monsters and for a low budget movie, the special effects were decent. 7/10
 
MVST1004H,-Ice-Cold-In-Alex.jpg


Ice-Cold In Alex (1958)

A bit slow-moving, but otherwise a very enjoyable film. I can't say much about it without spoiling it for those who might want to check it out, but suffice it to say that it's a simple but engrossing story, with unexpected depth. A couple of classic scenes in there too, and the performances are not bad either. 8/10
 
Saw Troll Hunter the other day. Someone compared it to Blair Witch Project and I'd agree with that. I thought it was pretty good actually. Unlike BWP, this movie actually showed the monsters and for a low budget movie, the special effects were decent. 7/10

I think the whole point of Blair Witch Project was not showing monsters.
 
Michael Jackson - This is it.

Review 1: It wasn't.
Review 2: Thank god!
Review 3: One for the fans - but at least it's not as cringey, vile or full of self worship as In Bed with Madonna, a film from the same genre.
 
Michael Jackson - This is it.

Review 1: It wasn't.
Review 2: Thank god!
Review 3: One for the fans - but at least it's not as cringey, vile or full of self worship as In Bed with Madonna, a film from the same genre.
I enjoyed it. Growing up with his music it brought back a few memories. I had never seen his work ethic before. He truly was a genius when it came to music...as for the rest of his personality and life choices...well, we can point fingers but the truth is, he was effed up.
 
70128698.jpg


Love and Other Drugs

2/5 stars

Anne Hathaway gets nekkid...a lot. For that I might tolerate the rest of the film, but in the end it was just a sappy chick flick without much focus. They were trying to put out a serious message while keeping the film light and comedic...but in the end I found no way to relate to the two main characters. My wife reminded me of the film "Sweet November" starring Keanu Reeves and Charlize Theron. After thinking about it for a moment, I realized this was an exact rip off of the plot, just replace Cancer with Parkinsens Disease.
 
70128698.jpg


Love and Other Drugs

2/5 stars

Anne Hathaway gets nekkid...a lot. For that I might tolerate the rest of the film, but in the end it was just a sappy chick flick without much focus. They were trying to put out a serious message while keeping the film light and comedic...but in the end I found no way to relate to the two main characters. My wife reminded me of the film "Sweet November" starring Keanu Reeves and Charlize Theron. After thinking about it for a moment, I realized this was an exact rip off of the plot, just replace Cancer with Parkinsens Disease.

Totes true. Most chick flicks follow the same format anyways. Not that it's a bad thing...

There's a funny photo somewhere that shows exactly what I mean though :lol:
 
At least there was some nekkidness. Sometimes you sit through the whole thing and don't even get that. That's why I gave it 2/5 stars instead of 1/5 stars.
 
Back