- 1,406
- New Zealand
At least there was some nekkidness. Sometimes you sit through the whole thing and don't even get that. That's why I gave it 2/5 stars instead of 1/5 stars.
Oh yeah nekkidness. Can't forget that
At least there was some nekkidness. Sometimes you sit through the whole thing and don't even get that. That's why I gave it 2/5 stars instead of 1/5 stars.
![]()
Bridesmaids - (4/10)
Shame on you, Apatow. You let this get made with your name on it. To me this just shows that you are going down the same path as Adam Sandler. You even let an SNL buddy write the movie they star in.
Call me sexist, but you cannot have a woman write a raunchy comedy for women. What happens is you wind up with unexplained side characters that add absolutely nothing to the film. Seriously, she has a friends with benefits guy on the side in order to find a way to fit in the sex jokes, which is painfully obvious when he has zero effect on the rest of the film. I even had to ask my wife who the guy was.
Anyway, I don't get why this was so well liked when it came out. Its just a chick flick, complete with predictable story, relationship issues, and BFF problems, with tangential fart and sex jokes thrown in so it is edgey. Oh, and guess who gets all the fart and "I don't want to see that" sex jokes? The fat chick. All this was missing was the token black guy, probably because it was all women and they figured Maya Rudolph was all the ethnicity necessary. I mean, it was a cast of minorities anyway, right?
To sum up. Don't do it. I don't care how funny your mom claims it is, it isn't. It is edgy by her standards, but you're going to want to kill yourself.
Unlike the previous two films, Fast5 used much less CGI to produce the action sequences. Most of the action was real and CGI was only used in post production to enhance the environment for the big screen.Decent plot that at least kept me halfway interested albeit the excessive use of CGI.
You mean the 1982 remake of the original 1951 movie?The Thing:
Didn't quite have the same atmosphere as the original '86 movie,
Yeah, Enigma from Another Planet over here too.I think you're thinking of The Blob
The Thing was called The Enigma from Another Planet here (El Enigma de Otro Planeta) I doubt we got the original one.
driftking18594Ides of March
Ides of March follows the primary campaign of fictional Pennsylvania governor Mike Morris (George Clooney), from the perspective of Stephen Myers (Ryan Gosling), one of the higher-ranked of his campaign team. It had a great plot, a great script and I felt that the score/OST adequately reflected the tension of the scenes. I think that it's an accurate portrayal of how dirty politics can be. I think that the various actors were very good in their roles. I think that Giamatti and [Philip Seymour] Hoffman are very good in their roles as being experienced and cynical, in contrast to Gosling's youthful idealism. The addition of the intern (Evan Rachel Wood) as a romantic interest is good at furthering the plot, and she
* SPOILER *
Clooney, I feel, gives off a very Obama-esque vibe. He evokes a lot of idealism in his supporters, and seems to be idealistic himself when he
* SPOILER *
All in all, this movie has what I call the "Holy Trinity" of movies: a good plot, a good cast and a good script. I give this movie a well-deserved 10/10.
Tom ServoFast Five (a.k.a. The Fast & The Furious 5, a.k.a. 5ast, 5urious, a.k.a. Whatever other combination I can make of the title to make it feel more appealing and groundbreaking, when in reality it's just another needless sequel) (Justin Lin, 2011) -- Not going to go into too much deatil about a movie that is just pop-corn Hollywood. Too much bad acting, too many cliches and 'improbable' action scenes. Decent plot that at least kept me halfway interested albeit the excessive use of CGI. I've heard a lot of people saying it's the best or 2nd best of the series, and I'd have to agree, but only because the first one was crap and all the others have been worse... this one is a level above crap, but still smells like a turd. One funny detail of the movie is that while the first and the 3rd (Tokyo Drift, was it?) are moreso about imports, this one sounds more like the American auto industry having a go at the movie and portraying every amazing car as a Chrysler product. A very meh-ish movie. 3.5/10
+1 👍Now for my review. I watched Snatch staring Brad Pit and I have heard of it before but never seen it. Anything with bra Pitt I assume will be good or at least decent because why hire someone and pay his huge price if your movie is going to be crap. Luckily I was right and the movie was pretty sweet. It was funny for what was going on and brad pitt plays an irish gypsy who barely speaks understandable English which was truly hilarious to listen to and must have been really hard to practice for. It's all about the British crime scene underground world and is focused more on debts being payed off. A bunch of small stories are going on which all relate and than really start to interconnect with each other at the end. Highly recommended.
chuyler1+1 👍
Also, if you enjoyed "Snatch" you should also check out "Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels."
I've been meaning to watch Lady Vengeance for a while now, since I loved Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance and Old Boy, but I never really felt like it until last night. And like the other two, it was great.👍