- 3,144
- Lancashire
- Ryk_BRM
Did 6 runs today.
Three in an 1997 NSX Type S Zero
and
Three in a Mazda RX7 RS-R (97)
They were about the same sort of pace. Never had a chance of winning unless the AI double pitted (Not all of them did!) and My driving was not consistent enough for me to post times
I ran SH for None stop runs (5/3 brakes) for both cars... And two runs on SS tyres with a mid race stop.
The NSX may have the edge in pure pace, but for me it was chewing the rears a bit too fast when you push so I ran the risk of a last lap trip into the desert... Such a great reward risk final pair of corners... you want to go as fat as you dare... but if something goes wrong you have no room to save it and tend to end up doing a dust devil impression.
Stock No aids
454pp/285bhp/32torques/1270kg - NSX TypeS Zero - Best lap 1m24.4 (12m12 Race 1 stop)
441pp/262bhp/30torques/1230kg - RX-7 RS-R Best lap 1m24.2 (12m07 Race 1 stop)
25.8/24.2/24.9/31.0 (6F7-5R7)
46.5/24.3/25.2/25.7 (6F7-5R7)
12m07 1stop
I guess both could go sub 12 minutes for the race. The RX7 is very pushable. it is so kind to its tyres you can loon about like you are driving at 'Jackrabbits Springs' and have number 53 on the car.
Running 276bhp cars is tough, as the AI cars will swarm you on the straights... Pass/repass stuff. So you have to pick what side of the track you want to be on for the next corner earlier at times - Interesting but not perfect for testing cars!
L Matthews pulled a 11m22 and a 11m23 in his McLaren F1
Roseti in his Huarya was consistent in his 11m41 11m43 lap times.
I guess we all have the same AI names for the same AI fields. Which is kind of nice. Mulder in his Enzo is a bit of a slowpoke in it. 11m41 - Maranello will not be happy with that lack of pace.
Three in an 1997 NSX Type S Zero
and
Three in a Mazda RX7 RS-R (97)
They were about the same sort of pace. Never had a chance of winning unless the AI double pitted (Not all of them did!) and My driving was not consistent enough for me to post times
I ran SH for None stop runs (5/3 brakes) for both cars... And two runs on SS tyres with a mid race stop.
The NSX may have the edge in pure pace, but for me it was chewing the rears a bit too fast when you push so I ran the risk of a last lap trip into the desert... Such a great reward risk final pair of corners... you want to go as fat as you dare... but if something goes wrong you have no room to save it and tend to end up doing a dust devil impression.
Stock No aids
454pp/285bhp/32torques/1270kg - NSX TypeS Zero - Best lap 1m24.4 (12m12 Race 1 stop)
441pp/262bhp/30torques/1230kg - RX-7 RS-R Best lap 1m24.2 (12m07 Race 1 stop)
25.8/24.2/24.9/31.0 (6F7-5R7)
46.5/24.3/25.2/25.7 (6F7-5R7)
12m07 1stop
I guess both could go sub 12 minutes for the race. The RX7 is very pushable. it is so kind to its tyres you can loon about like you are driving at 'Jackrabbits Springs' and have number 53 on the car.
Running 276bhp cars is tough, as the AI cars will swarm you on the straights... Pass/repass stuff. So you have to pick what side of the track you want to be on for the next corner earlier at times - Interesting but not perfect for testing cars!
L Matthews pulled a 11m22 and a 11m23 in his McLaren F1
Roseti in his Huarya was consistent in his 11m41 11m43 lap times.
I guess we all have the same AI names for the same AI fields. Which is kind of nice. Mulder in his Enzo is a bit of a slowpoke in it. 11m41 - Maranello will not be happy with that lack of pace.
Last edited: