That's what I though when I got XP, I thought it was fantastic until I had to make the switch to 7 (for various reasons). I adore Win7. I didn't want 8 because it seems like a mobile platform - I and I can't bear to picture it running on my desktop. I got a windows phone last year (now updated to WP8.1) and I love the interface. Like mentioned before it would be nice if Microsoft had an iOS and OSX operating systems for mobile platforms and PC.And ill just stick to W7 for another 10 years, because its perfect for me.
That's what I though when I got XP, I thought it was fantastic until I had to make the switch to 7 (for various reasons). I adore Win7. I didn't want 8 because it seems like a mobile platform - I and I can't bear to picture it running on my desktop. I got a windows phone last year (now updated to WP8.1) and I love the interface. Like mentioned before it would be nice if Microsoft had an iOS and OSX operating systems for mobile platforms and PC.
I know but my problem is that Win 8 looks so much like an mobile operating platform it blurs the lines between desktop and mobile (some tablets use Windows 8 too I think?).They kinda do have their own mobile platform.
Windows RT.
There are countless third party start buttons that you can install for free or under $5 that give you a Start button in Win8. It's about as lame an excuse as the "PS3 has no games" thing at this point.
I know but my problem is that Win 8 looks so much like an mobile operating platform it blurs the lines between desktop and mobile (some tablets use Windows 8 too I think?).
I'm using Pokki.
The point is, though... you shouldn't need to customize the OS to work on a fairly standard computer.
Of course, my main beef with 8 is something that you can retroactively apply to most Windows systems when running on hardware that was out when they were launched...
It's too damn heavy.
I do a lot of intensive graphics work, and I need a system that doesn't use up available resources for fancy graphical effects I don't really need.
But then, that's just me.
It makes sense when the majority of the market will be on a tablet type device by the end of the decade. This includes "home" computer setups that will just be a panel and maybe a keyboard. Amusingly, a Comp Sci professor of mine quite likes Windows 8.1 and his standard work environment is about as desktop centric as you can imagine.
MS is playing for the future and took the risk of upsetting some people in the process.
If 8 could fool me into thinking it was 7 I'd have no complaints. My complaints amount to dropping all the familiarity of 7 and giving me absolutely nothing (GUI related) in return. If I wanted to I could probably sit down and learn Win 8, but one of the things I hate to see in a product is arbitrary change. I'll stand against an otherwise good product if the manufacturer decides to make pointless alterations every other week. Win 8 was made with mobile/touchscreen devices in mind but it was also sold as an upgrade to Win 7. When it comes to desktops, pretty much every change up front was a step backwards because it was a change that didn't need to be made and/or provides no advantages. This would be instantly remedied by making these changes optional.What if Microsoft fixed the problems in the newest versions and added back most of the functionalist feel of W7? Would you even have a problem, because there would basically be the best of both worlds.. which is what is needed to grow mobile device sales; the push for desktop and mobile like applications with a dynamic OS to mend it together. I don't see anything wrong with that, and honestly neither should you.
Excuse? All my machines are running on W7, they handle all my tasks, games and needs beautifully. If I was to upgrade to W8, it would be just "for the sake of it" and then on top of that, I'd have to install a third-party start menu. You're talking like upgrading was an obligation and people needed to make excuses for some reason. Also PS3 not having any games...?There are countless third party start buttons that you can install for free or under $5 that give you a Start button in Win8. It's about as lame an excuse as the "PS3 has no games" thing at this point.
When you write "I would upgrade if it had a start button", what am I supposed to take away from that other than you saying the start button is what's holding you back?Excuse? All my machines are running on W7, they handle all my tasks, games and needs beautifully. If I was to upgrade to W8, it would be just "for the sake of it" and then on top of that, I'd have to install a third-party start menu. You're talking like upgrading was an obligation and people needed to make excuses for some reason. Also PS3 not having any games...?
Yeah, I don't see it.
My statement wasn't absolute like you're trying to make it sound. I said that I might make the switch. Which is exactly how I feel about W9. If the start button makes a come back then I'll consider making the switch. It isn't the only factor in my decision to upgrade.When you write "I would upgrade if it had a start button", what am I supposed to take away from that other than you saying the start button is what's holding you back?
Control Panel > System and Security > System > Advanced System Settings > In the advanced tab, select Settings underneath Performance. There are loads of options in there, along with generic adjust for best performance/appearance options.
That's EXACTLY one of the things I hate about 8!!! How many levels down into the menus is that screen you need??!!!?
I get to System by right-clicking Computer on the desktop and picking Properties. Also, I ungroup my Control Panel to unbury my options. I'm not sure either of those step-saving choices in in Win8. If they are, fine.
I like the sound of this.So according to this article (http://www.winbeta.org/news/windows-9-threshold-welcome-modern-ui-20), there will be two different versions; One for desktops which will use the standard desktop, and one for devices that "don't need (desktops)" such as tablets which will only use the Start Screen, or "Metro UI".
More information is in the included article, as well as its comment section.
The error noise is the stuff of legends.Windows 98 forevah, yo.