Would you rather?

  • Thread starter Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,114,951 views
1960s Vans; I guess the Ford Econoline if I had to choose either. Although, I really don't care for vans than much other than the Ford Transit.

Ford Ranger vs Mazda B-Series; they're basically the same truck, which means I'm basically just picking either for the slight styling differences and badge. With that said, I pick the Ford ranger, I never liked the thin headlights choosen for the Mazda B-Series.
 
But ricers drive mostly Civics.

That's my point. People thinking they can make something good out of cars like Civics. It just gives me a bad impression of Japanese cars. I don't mind cars like Supras and Skylines to be honest, because they're usually owned by people who have pride in their vehicle.

Not true. The Dodge Neon and Scion TC revolution has begun!

Two words: Dodge and Neon.

I hate those too.
 
For example, the Dodge Dart only has a American name on it.
Which kind of pissed me off a little bit because of the legacy attached to the name. But at the end of the day, I don't own them so I can't really be mad.

Dodge Neons actually aren't all that bad little cars. The ones I have been around usually were beaters than didn't fire on all cylinders/had broken motor mounts etc and they kept on chugging.
 
No it's not. The Ranger is almost all foreign with the exception of some drivetrain parts.
Ferd engine, ferd axles, 'murican brand tires, and it was built in Kentucky and New freaking Jersey. Mazda made the transmission and a few other things, but as far as I know, it was mostly American.

How can you make something good out of a Civic?
Mugen-MOTUL-CIVIC-Si-racecar..JPG
 
Back