Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,112,936 views
I don't know alot about Aston's, but I'd choose the older one, its easier on the eyes in my opinion, the New one just looks like any other Aston Martin made after 1999
 
Love that older V8 Vantage. Beautiful car. To motortrend: sorry i never read the rules to begin with, i always sort of figured it was comparing any two cars. I will read the new rules carefully before making a post next time.
 
Bricklin SV-1 vs. DMC Delorean - Delorean because I don't want a Safety Vehicle ;)

Subaru Impreza WRX STi 22B Coupe vs. Mitsubishi Lancer Evo V - Scooby all the time.

Countach 5000QV vs. Reventon Coupe - Countach, I hate the Reventon.

Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4 vs. Dodge Stealth R/T Twin-Turbo - 3000GT because it's not a 80s-90s Dodge.

2013 Mustang GT vs. C6 Corvette - Corvette, they really messed up the 2013 Mustang IMO.

2013 Hyundai Genesis Coupe vs. 2013 Scion FR-S - Genesis, it's so beautiful and fast. (Not saying that the FR-S isn't though ;))

2011 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 2012 Chevrolet Impala LTZ - Impala, because I think Mercury was stuck in the past when they made the Grand Marquis.

1989 Aston Martin 5.3 V8 Vantage vs. 2011 Aston Martin Vantage - Ahh, ze clazzic look of ze old V8 Vantage. (If you don't get the joke then look at my avatar. If you still don't get the joke then I don't know what to tell you).
 
GranTurismo916
Bricklin SV-1 vs. DMC Delorean - Delorean because I don't want a Safety Vehicle ;)
Click to expand...


I find it hillarious that the 1975-1976 Bricklins, had a Ford 351 Windsor V8 in them, which can put out more than twice the horsepower than that found in a DMC Delorean, and yet the Delorean is considered a more sporty vehicle :lol:
 
Watt2159
I find it hillarious that the 1975-1976 Bricklins, had a Ford 351 Windsor V8 in them, which can put out more than twice the horsepower than that found in a DMC Delorean, and yet the Delorean is considered a more sporty vehicle :lol:
Click to expand...

The Bricklin was 700 pounds heavier, overheated with the stock radiator, and 1975-1976 versions only came with automatics.
 
Grand Marquis VS Impala: Well, that's an easy one. The Impala is a bland, boring, dull, uninspiring front wheel drive sedan that's actually not big on the inside (ridden in one), and has no personality what so ever. The only interesting thing about it is that the doors are immensely heavy. Meanwhile, the Marquis is reasonably nice to look at, has decent performance, and rear wheel drive, which means that you can really hoon around in it if you so choose. Not to mention it has a certain elegance over the Crown Victoria, but isn't as common as the Town Car.

Old Vantage VS New Vantage: I know nothing of the old one, but I'll still take it. I just do not find the new Vantage attractive; it looks too normal.

BMW i3 - Expected to be around $45,000
BMW-i3-1.jpg


BMW Isetta - $46,000 for a perfect example
7167953929_9306be7d4a_b.jpg
 
BMW Isetta Because

A I Like the looks of it and it is a Classic

B I've sat in one in The BMW Dealer



How about this panther VS B Body cars From the 1980's and 90's


1988 mercury Grand marquis


800px-1988-91_Mercury_Grand_Marquis.jpg



VS 1991 Chevrolet caprice
7899-1991-Chevrolet-Caprice.jpg
 
Theace37
Why?
Click to expand...

Because the FR-S and Genesis are both excellent cars and are drift ready right out of the box, affordable and reliable, that's why it's kinda tough to chose. Even if someone would give me a choice like this and they will buy, I would gladly ask for both. :sly:

Grand Marquis LS vs. Impala LTZ: The Marquis wins hands down. I driven two Impalas and they were ok, but I wouldn't buy one. The Cruze and a Cobalt is way better. And the Marquis is closer to the CV and RWD, perfect for the track and drifting. :sly:

Aston Martin V8 Vantage 5.3L vs. Aston Martin V8 Vantage: The 5.3L wins this round, because classic and I don't like the newer V8 Vantage that much.

BMW i3 vs. BMW Isetta: I'll take the i3.

'88 Grand Marquis vs. '91 Caprice: Hmmmm.... I'll take the Caprice.
 
Grand Marquis VS Caprice : Hmm...tough one. I've sat in a Grand Marquis of similar vintage (an '84), and it was quite nice inside. Classic 80s blue cloth upholstery that felt fantastic, and seats that felt like La-Z-Boys, and just a nice, simplistic design theme. The exterior's also styled nicely, but the big let down is that V8 with not a whole lot of power. But the Caprice is also a favorite of mine, it's got a nice interior, better styling inside and out, but performance isn't much better, and I'd bet it's louder. I guess I'll take the Grand Marquis because it has more presence than the Caprice.

 
Grand Marquis or Impala : Definitely the Grand Marquis because it looks good and the new Impalas are ugly and an embarrassment to the old ones.

BMW i3 or Isetta: Not a fan of either, but definitely the i3.

Grand Marquis or the Caprice: I love both but I'll take the Caprice, love that generation of the Caprice.
 
Cimarron VS Pink Prius : Cimarron. At least it blends in with other cars on the road and doesn't call attention to its awfulness. The pink Prius is the equivalent of wearing Crocs, a Snuggie, and suspenders at the same time. :yuck:
 
Cadillac VS Mercedes-Benz : Hmm, tough one. I like both of them much, much more than their sedan and wagon counterparts, and I really like the styling on both. I guess I'll go for the CTS-V, because it has that striking presence that the Merc doesn't quite have. Not to mention, C63s are surprisingly common around here, much more than the CTS-V, which isn't rare, but isn't common either.
 
CTS-V vs Merc- Definitley the CTS-V. I love Caddy's. And that Merc looks very outdated; even if the CTS has had fewer facelifts. The CTS-V just flows aggressively and the Merc is much too curvy and bleh.
 
Last edited:

Latest Posts

Back