Would you rather?
- Thread starter motortrend
- 22,046 comments
- 1,109,838 views
- 145
- Southeast VA
- TriumphTT900
This Bugatti Veyron that you can't sell and replaces your regular car, it never breaks down and never runs out of fuel somehow, but the top speed is reduced to 25.3 MPH
OR
Walking
is that a joke or something?
gamerdog6482
(Banned)
- 6,233
- Venom, USA
- Gamerdog6482
This Bugatti Veyron that you can't sell and replaces your regular car, it never breaks down and never runs out of fuel somehow, but the top speed is reduced to 25.3 MPH
OR
Walking
The Bugatti Veyron, even if it has infinite fuel, has to run out of oil eventually.
In order to change the oil, you need to lift the engine...
That is ~$100,000 every couple months.
- 12,389
- Betelgeuse
- Beeblebrox_237
The Hyundai Accent is supposed to be one of the best cars in the Rio's class, the Rio is one of the worst. The focus has a very cramped backseat, but otherwise it's a nice car. So for me, the Focus. However, my advice to you: Look at the Accent, Chevy Sonic, Toyota Yaris, and Honda Fit.
- 145
- Southeast VA
- TriumphTT900
Come on guys! What about the beater trucks!
- 12,389
- Betelgeuse
- Beeblebrox_237
If I'm honest, I have no idea which is better. Which one drifts more easily?
- 145
- Southeast VA
- TriumphTT900
Beeblebrox237
Both probably drift about the same as long as the bed is empty.
gamerdog6482
(Banned)
- 6,233
- Venom, USA
- Gamerdog6482
- 145
- Southeast VA
- TriumphTT900
Kent
Id buy an E36.
- 8,100
- Guelph, Ontario
Not
M3 for me, much cooler than an S4.
I'd go with an early 2000s model, I like that bodystyle best.
The Vanishing Boy
Premium
- 9,000
- Quezon City, Philippines & Las Vegas, NV
- GTP_VanishingBoy
- Vanishing Boy
-> ...
-> But for a fair fight why not compare the Rio to:
- Accent
- Fit
- Veloster
- Fiesta
- Mazda 2
- Sonic
- etc
-> Or the Focus with:
- Elantra GT
- Mazda 3
- Forte
- etc
^ Same question was asked pages ago. So I'm sticking with the HHR.
^ The most mis-match comparo I've seen so far. For this comparo, I'd pick the Focus.
-> But for a fair fight why not compare the Rio to:
- Accent
- Fit
- Veloster
- Fiesta
- Mazda 2
- Sonic
- etc
-> Or the Focus with:
- Elantra GT
- Mazda 3
- Forte
- etc
^ I will never consider any pickup with 2WD at all. But for here I'll take the C/K.
^ Walking...
^ Supra RZ easy. Because, Liftback/hatchback.
^ Depends what kind of M3 or S4 it is.
- 1,468
- Coventry
- aadil717
I think the question should be more specific.
But I'll go with M3, because M3. /discussion
It's better in every way compared to the S4...maybe apart from practicality - but then that's not why you buy the car so it's irrelevant.
Oh and if I get to choose one; I'd pick the E46 (post facelift) in Velvet Blue/Purple with white/ivory leather. SMG II would be good if I got unlimited warranty, if not then ill take the good old manual.
But I'll go with M3, because M3. /discussion
It's better in every way compared to the S4...maybe apart from practicality - but then that's not why you buy the car so it's irrelevant.
Oh and if I get to choose one; I'd pick the E46 (post facelift) in Velvet Blue/Purple with white/ivory leather. SMG II would be good if I got unlimited warranty, if not then ill take the good old manual.
- 6,098
- Phoenix, AZ
HHR VS PT Cruiser : Uh, eww. I'd rather clean a public restroom.
F150 VS C1500 : Hmm, tough one. I like the styling of the Chevy more, but have you seen the interior on those early models? Looks all awkward and sharp-edged and cheap in there. So, I'll go with the Ford, with its more conventional interior. Now, if the Chevy was a 1995 as well, I'd go with it, as it had the much more soft, luxurious interior by then, and it's nicer looking on the outside.
Veyron VS Walking : I live in the suburbs. If you can't go more than 50 mph, you're screwed. Now, if I lived in the city, a 25 mph Veyron could be viable, but even then, our downtown area is so small, that there never really is rush-hour within the city, and if there is, it's on the nearby highway, where cars are going much more than 25 mph. So, I'll choose walking.
M3 VS S4 : I'll go with the S4. Like I said a couple of pages before, the M3's never really "done it" for me. I find the S4 to be a nicer looking, more upmarket, luxurious, and advanced car. It doesn't have a V8, but I'm sure the boosted six cylinder, coupled with all wheel drive, can provide enough thrill in the corners.
GT86 VS Supra : Easy, the Supra. It's nicer looking, rarer, legendary, and faster. It's also a bit more luxurious, has a T-Top, and has a masterpiece of an engine.
1991 Honda CRX Si - 172,000 miles, mint condition, $5,500
2002 Honda Civic Si - 103,000 miles, decent condition, $5,250
F150 VS C1500 : Hmm, tough one. I like the styling of the Chevy more, but have you seen the interior on those early models? Looks all awkward and sharp-edged and cheap in there. So, I'll go with the Ford, with its more conventional interior. Now, if the Chevy was a 1995 as well, I'd go with it, as it had the much more soft, luxurious interior by then, and it's nicer looking on the outside.
Veyron VS Walking : I live in the suburbs. If you can't go more than 50 mph, you're screwed. Now, if I lived in the city, a 25 mph Veyron could be viable, but even then, our downtown area is so small, that there never really is rush-hour within the city, and if there is, it's on the nearby highway, where cars are going much more than 25 mph. So, I'll choose walking.
M3 VS S4 : I'll go with the S4. Like I said a couple of pages before, the M3's never really "done it" for me. I find the S4 to be a nicer looking, more upmarket, luxurious, and advanced car. It doesn't have a V8, but I'm sure the boosted six cylinder, coupled with all wheel drive, can provide enough thrill in the corners.
GT86 VS Supra : Easy, the Supra. It's nicer looking, rarer, legendary, and faster. It's also a bit more luxurious, has a T-Top, and has a masterpiece of an engine.
1991 Honda CRX Si - 172,000 miles, mint condition, $5,500
2002 Honda Civic Si - 103,000 miles, decent condition, $5,250
- 8,100
- Guelph, Ontario
If it's the "Type R" that's in the photo, then I'll go with the Civic.
Much better car from all perspectives.
Only thing a CR-X excels at is being a very quick Mini Stock racer. (Apart from the fact that the 3 valve head gives it a big weight penalty.)
Much better car from all perspectives.
Only thing a CR-X excels at is being a very quick Mini Stock racer. (Apart from the fact that the 3 valve head gives it a big weight penalty.)
Last edited:
gamerdog6482
(Banned)
- 6,233
- Venom, USA
- Gamerdog6482
Neither.
- 1,391
- Chicago
- Silberc
- Silberc
I'd take the CRX, regardless of miles because I'd just swap in a B18C1 anyways...
- 145
- Southeast VA
- TriumphTT900
CR-X. Early 90s Hondas were the best built IMO.
- 7,551
- London
- MattyTheDog
I'd take the Civic.
E28
Premium
- 5,019
- Bristol
- Sofa
- 12,389
- Betelgeuse
- Beeblebrox_237
Civic.
gamerdog6482
(Banned)
- 6,233
- Venom, USA
- Gamerdog6482
Mercedes-Benz CLK-GTR. I'd take almost anything over a Veyron, as they are simply too expensive.
gamerdog6482
(Banned)
- 6,233
- Venom, USA
- Gamerdog6482
Plus I think I see gullwings on that...
- 1,391
- Chicago
- Silberc
- Silberc
CLK GTR
Because it's sexy, and does cool flips.
Because it's sexy, and does cool flips.
- 1,124
- TexasTyme214
CLK GTR because CLK GTR.
- 145
- Southeast VA
- TriumphTT900
Have to go with the CLK GTR
