Would you rather?

  • Thread starter motortrend
  • 22,046 comments
  • 1,107,012 views
gamerdog6482
No, the Vantage is FR.
Click to expand...
jackie-chan-meme_reasonably_small.png

But uh Ferrari, becuase of the history behind it.......and I'm not a big fan of Astons
 
gamerdog6482
I don't want the Ferrari because it is ugly, and it's an FR Ferrari. I never really liked FR Ferraris.
That AM is much more aesthetically pleasing, at least to me.
Click to expand...

I totally agree!
 
1988_sledgehammer.jpg

1988 Callaway Sledgehammer
Price:$400,000
Top Speed: 254 MPH

OR​

ssc-ultimate-aero-2009-front-main-studio.jpg

2009 SSC Aero
Price:$660,000
Top Speed: Unconfirmed, but SSC states it can go 270 MPH​
 
SSC, I've never really like the styling of the Sledgehammer.
Also, a C4 Corvette never did have the greatest handling.
 
Let's see...
Top one: Ugly. Pop-up headlights on that boxy frame?
Bottom one: Is red, and appears to be a targa, so I'll take that one.
I really don't like Toyotas though.
 
Bopop4
SSC, I've never really like the styling of the Sledgehammer.
Also, a C4 Corvette never did have the greatest handling.
Click to expand...

Oh come on, you could literally FEEL the road in those things. :dopey:

But as for my choice, it would be the Callaway, while the SSC is just an amazing car, and would ultimately destroy the Sledgehammer in a race, I just love the Callaway, having seen it in person, knowing about it since my childhood, and watching the documentary on it enough to ruin the VCR we had when I was younger, it's just left an permanent imprint on my mind.
 
It's more about the steering feel, Dad and I were in one and the steering was very sloppy.

And am I detecting bias? ;)
 
^That.

The later one is a bit too rounded, but the mkIII is too boxy.

But the mkIII has cooler taillights, so I'll take that one. :dopey:
 
Bopop4
And am I detecting bias? ;)
Click to expand...

No, I'm just stating my opinion on a car, like everyone else, there's no bias, bias would be
SSGAY SUX CUASE I LIKE CALLUHWAYE

but as for Supra's..........I honestly don't know, I love the MK III's looks over the MK IV's Ferrari-ish look, but the MK IV had performance that would make RX7's, and Skylines nervous......I guess the IV, because while it does look like a Ferrari, at least it doesn't look like the other Japanese imports of that era.
 
Watt2159
No, I'm just stating my opinion on a car, like everyone else, there's no bias, bias would be
SSGAY SUX CUASE I LIKE CALLUHWAYE
Click to expand...

I was just joking that since you had grown up with the Sledgehammer, it will always be a part of you, and you'll naturally be biased towards it, like how I am with the F50, NFS:HP2. :lol:
 
Watt2159
1988 Callaway Sledgehammer
Price:$400,000
Top Speed: 254 MPH

OR

2009 SSC Aero
Price:$660,000
Top Speed: Unconfirmed, but SSC states it can go 270 MPH
Click to expand...

Is that Callaway based on the C4 corvette or C5? I forget because i think the Callaway C12 was based off of the C5.
 
1992 Toyota MR2 - 100% Factory - 2.2l N/A I4 - Automatic Tranny - 157k miles - $5,000
1992%20Toyota%20MR2%20Yellow%202.JPG


1986 Toyota MR2 - 100% Factory - 1.6l N/A I4 - Standard Tranny - 83k miles - $5,000
mk1_b.jpg
 

Latest Posts

Back