- 7,956
- BradleyH131
Cars arent for impressing chics.
Correct, they're for getting from A to B as safely, reliably and efficiently as possible. Something that most cars will do better than a 107k mile 15 Year old Civic
Cars arent for impressing chics.
+1
The Infiniti G20 had that engine and up until a few years ago, it had the highest percentage of one-owner cars still on the road. Very very reliable. Only problem is the SE-R Sentra is freaking impossible to find - when was the last time you saw one?
My God he's actually going to buy this thing.
Joey... Azuremen... brace yourselves.
Maybe not so much the safety part, but reliably and efficiently, Hell yes.Correct, they're for getting from A to B as safely, reliably and efficiently as possible. Something that most cars will do better than a 107k mile 15 Year old Civic
It hasnt happened yet.
M5Power hates Civics, hmm?
Wow that must suck SO MUCH, I drove a car with electronic power steering and I wanted to crash it into a wall, you get absolutely no feedback.It's like driving a space ship.
Lol wut?although a bit difficult to drive in the city with it's revvy engine.
Wow that must suck SO MUCH, I drove a car with electronic power steering and I wanted to crash it into a wall, you get absolutely no feedback.
A spaceship would have even more of that "disconnected" feeling.
👍What I mean is, it's like driving a space ship because of the way the controls and dials are laid out:
![]()
-> After seeing that [EG] Civic. I think you hit the jackpot YSS, I mean sure the car is a bit on the high side, but all the benefits outweigh its disadvantages.
BT-> If you can negosiate the fella down to USD$3,500 cash, I should say take it. Because you can't get an un-molested [EG] Si in a radius of 1,500 miles. Plus its very cheap to maintain, and putt-putts like a dream.
Don't B13s have crazy rust problems? And aren't B14s terrible?
Wow that must suck SO MUCH, I drove a car with electronic power steering and I wanted to crash it into a wall, you get absolutely no feedback.
...That, and the 2006 GTI "at cost"
Seeing as there's a 2007 Si sitting in the driveway of a 1999 Si owner, I'll provide a simpleton's assessment of all that car's newfangled technology.
The throttle sucks. It's electronic.
The steering is quick, precise, and solid. It's electronic.
The clutch and brake are light--the brake almost too light. Also, the throttle pedal is hinged to the floor and shaped in a way that makes heel-and-toe downshifting really easy and really fun. Well, besides that electronic throttle which means I have to forget everything I learned about rev matching and take lessons all over again.
The seats are killer.
The shifter is lame ass. It's quick, easy, and precise, but it's cable actuated, unlike my "old-school" hard linkage, which is the next best thing to the stick going straight into the tranny, a la Miata, Rex, Viper, or any other good sports car. The '99 is almost-sports car in that sense. You can feel--and even hear--the transmission working.
The engine is quite torquey at anything above 2000rpm, unlike my B16 which needs at least 3000. But the VTEC doesn't kick until 6000, which means the new car has 700 fewer go-fast revs than mine.
Basically the new Si is an awesome car, but my sports car mindset would advise me to get the old Hatch and tune it a bit. It's a much more pure and sporty car than the new FG. Also, it's proven to be reliable, unlike the transmission problems that are becoming apparent in K20 manual transmissions.
It would be a good machine to own. And it also has a good bit of warranty left.
^ Early Si such as the [EG] Civic, doesn't require Premium gas. Since its not like other Honda engines like the B16 ([EK] Civic Si & Type-R), B17 ([DB2] Intergra GS-R), B18 VTEC ([DC2] Integra GSR & Type-R), and the K20 ([FG] Civic Si; [DC5] RSX-S; [CL7] TSX) In which all of them have ultra-high revs and compression ratios. So you're safe with an 87 oct., 91-95 oct, is optional, that why I love those oldschool Civics.Thats what I'm feeling too. Between the monthly payment on the loan and insurance, it'll cost about the same as just the monthly payment on a brand-new Mazda. I'd be happy to have an extra $130 in my pocket each month not having to pay insurance on that. Matched with the fuel-savings too (the Honda gets about 5 MPG better in the city), the only real problem I can think of is that it may have to run on premium... But I don't know for sure.
^ The only that you have to worry about a Civic that old is, if the timing belt has been changed or a complete tune up. Take note Honda's back in the day, it doesn't have the 100,000 mi interval (I believe) scheduled tune ups like the more recent Honda.I'm figuring an inital offer of $3500 to $3700, but I'm willing to work with the person. If its as good as it sounds, and has all of the maintenance up to date (says that it was dealer-serviced, all records available --> 90K service, newer tires, etc) I'm willing to go the extra mile to get a nice car. A/C be damned, it doesn't get that hot here anyway.