District 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wardy 944
  • 40 comments
  • 4,241 views
I first heard about this film while in Chicago and saw this at a bus stop:

5159_588006328826_38505333_34094683_1263393_n.jpg


I didn't quite understand it but I went to their website and saw that it was a film. I will probably see it as it looks like something I would enjoy. I haven't seen the trailer yet (I'm at work with no speakers) but I'll check it out when I get home.

It's based off a short film called Alive in Joburg.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alive_in_Joburg
 
Thanks Joey:tup:

The movie synopsis has now been put up on IMDB, I won't put it on here because it contains spoilers but if you really really want to know....http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt1136608/synopsis

Has anyone tried ringing the telephone number on the poster? I'm guessing "hello MNU, how can I help" :)
 
I had some interest in seeing it when it tried to present it as a "documentary" of sorts movie, as well as the alien interrogation.

But, the last trailer I saw changed my mind. That trailer presented as another humans vs. aliens flick.
 
Thanks Joey:tup:

The movie synopsis has now been put up on IMDB, I won't put it on here because it contains spoilers but if you really really want to know....http://uk.imdb.com/title/tt1136608/synopsis

Has anyone tried ringing the telephone number on the poster? I'm guessing "hello MNU, how can I help" :)

The number takes you to a "hotline" set up by Multi National United, the company from the film. It gives you information about the film without actually giving anything away. You can go to http://multinationalunited.com/#/10 to get the same experience.

After watching the trailer it looks like it should be a decent film, although it wasn't quite was I expected. I thought it was going to have a humour side to it but it really looks like a "serious" movie, sort of Independence Day meets Transformers meets Resident Evil.

I'll defiantly go see it once it's out.
 
I think it looks pretty interesting, to say the least. The short film had been on my radar for some time (as I recall, wasn't the dude who directed it supposed to be doing something with the Halo movie?). Whether it is a documentary, some kind of action film, or whatever... Its a neat look at an alternate reality that becomes an interesting allegory for our own world (particularly in the face of race and other minority issues).

I seem to recall that 500 Days of Summer will be splashing around at the same time, and some other big movie. GI Joe? Or Something? I'm a bit worried its going to get washed out, and I don't like that.
 
I have to admit I have mixed feelings about the film, now that I've seen it. On the one hand, my hat is off to Blomkamp for making a movie of this magnitude for (reportedly) $30 million. The overall size and scope of the film is massive for a budget of that size, despite taking place in only a few select places. Secondly, Peter Jackson gets an award for believing in Blomkamp as well. Recall, of course, that these two were supposed to do the Halo movie. This is what ended up coming out of that.

Where my mixed feelings come from is with the overall feeling of the story. Right, there is the Apartheid allegory. There is the commentary on the military industrial complex as well. As well as a wash of different metaphors for the increasing number of challenges we face today in our increasingly complex world. Sure, I like the way it ends up working, and furthermore, it seems somewhat effective. But in the end, the pacing felt "off," and if anything, a tad bit forced. I think where the praise and criticism comes from, generally, is for how the story overall unfolds. It starts as a Documentary, and then moves full force into an Action/Chase film. Expected? Pretty much. Executed perfectly? Not entirely.


What I think is more important to pull out of this is that, yes, the "original" Sci-Fi genre is still alive and kicking, and District 9 proves that new franchises can (and should!) be created. We can only have so many reboots of classic movies, television programs, and comic books. District 9, in that sense, is totally different - and it feels that way from beginning to end. The deal, generally, should be whether or not the audience buys it. I hope that they do. Blomkamp deserves to get to helm more projects, and develop more unique IPs. Furthermore, if District 9 does well, that means that others will have their chance to make their own unique IPs, and see them on the big-screen.

District 9
8.5/10
 
Short Review.

Awesome. Original. Thrilling. MUST SEE!!!

9.2/10 on my scoreboard 👍

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
 
Saw it tonight with Kate and I thought it was excellent. It was defiantly a nice departure from the crap that's been coming out, sadly based on the previews it looks like District 9 might have been a fluke with good films.

Without really giving anything away I'll say that I do see the parallels to the Apartheid like Brad pointed out. Also, I'm willing to bet if aliens ever came to Earth this is the way we would treat them.

I can also see where a sequel might be spawned later on down the line to answer some unanswered questions.
 
I just saw this movie, too, and I loved every second of it.. It was different, really..

To tired to post a mini review, might come back tomorrow. :D
 
I talked to some of the people I saw it with last night, and on a days worth of thought, they decided they didn't like it at all. "Weird," I thought, "is this going to be something that pleases on a vary narrow set of interests? Or is the film not living up to the hype?"

My expectations, in reflection, may have been a bit too high. Hence the slightly lower rating. Its still a brilliant film, but I have to say that I don't want a sequel. Let it be, like Blade Runner. Leave it to our imagination to figure out what will happen.
 
I just want to get this out of the way:











BEST MOVIE OF THE YEAR.


Finally, finally, finally, someone in Hollywood realized that you can create a sci-fi action adventure film without turning your brain off to enjoy anything other than explosions. This film is intelligent, asks you to actually keep your mind working, is humanizing, has character, and you can relate to the aliens. But hey, if you are a Michael Bay "stuff goes boom, yay" fan then just wait until the weapons come out.

Every time I complain about the stupidity of things like Transformers, this film, this thought for story and plot, is what I am talking about being missing. This movie didn't have action sequences put together first and a crappy, plot hole filled story tacked on later. No, they wrote a story first. They put effort into making a good story and then the action was a natural organic progression of the story, meaning that the writing of the story necessitated the action scenes to happen how and when they do. Anyone who has done any kind of serious creative writing understand what I am talking about. Once a proper story is being written or told it progresses naturally on its own. The writer almost becomes a tool of the story. This is how major characters wind up dead, what makes a story feel real, and how action happens without feeling like the action was the reason for the story. The action should always be the effect of the story, not the reason for it.


All that said, if you like your action with a bit of mental exercise, if you do not accept, "There was action, and explosions, and boobs. What did you expect, Citizen Kane? That's not the point. Explosions are," as a valid excuse for the absolute crap that Michael Bay and his ilk put out on a regular basis then this movie is for you. If you think Michael Bay is a brilliant filmmaker (making lots of money is not a sign of a brilliant film, just business savvy) then you may enjoy this film, but turn your brain back on or you might hurt yourself.


Go see this film. Peter Jackson and Neil Blomkamp have done what the rest of the sci-fi action guys have forgotten to do, engage their audience with a quality film. They deserve your support. Hollywood needs to be reminded that these kinds of movies are just as welcome as the action-filled movies that appeared to have accidentally blown their script up during a stunt. And most importantly Blomkamp needs to be welcomed with open arms, because God knows if Michael Bay and the like are able to continue on that we will all be brain dead morons in a couple of generations.

And this means that (I am about to paraphrase Movie Bob from The escapist here) you should not wait for DVD/BD and you should not go to whatever douche bag pirate site you think you can justify using. You should pay to see this movie. And if you want to see it again, pay again. They deserve every single penny they get from this film.


I went to see the film at 1:30 PM on Saturday, hardly geek hours, and the theater was nearly packed, and there were cheers and applause. I expect that on premiere night and midnight sneak peaks, but have never seen it in a midday Saturday showing.

I talked to some of the people I saw it with last night, and on a days worth of thought, they decided they didn't like it at all.
These the same guys you were referring to when you said this about GI Joe?
My friends and I? We were as giddy as 10 year olds coming out of the theater.



All I can say is thank God, or whatever you choose, that the Halo film, guaranteed to be utter crap, was dropped and Peter Jackson chose to not let Neil Blomkamp go, and instead had him turn his independent short film into this feature film.


And as you walk away from this film, remember one thing: Neil Blomkamp had never directed a major film before (think Robert Rodriguez before Desperado) and Sharlto Copley had never acted professionally before (think Bruce Campbell before Evil Dead). Peter Jackson reached out his hands made of pure talent and plucked this duo out of obscurity.




With all luck the universe will remain properly in line to prevent Halo from ever being made. The story was bad (and unoriginal) in the game, and you can't replicate the multiplayer on the silver screen.
 
I liked it, I really did. And like FK, I applaud that someone in Hollywood is actually pointing out real world situations through a movie.

I really had no gripes other than that it was surprising how the actual contents of the canister caused the mayhem for Wikus, or how Christopher & his son seemed to be the only intelligent ones. It's also very true that you can't really let anything out about this movie without spoiling it, as I had choose the right words for my "gripes" without giving away clues.


As for anyone talking about a sequel, please don't encourage it. This movie does not need to be turned into some god awful sci-fi trilogy. It works beautifully on its own, esp. when you consider that the whole movie is inspired from the actual history of District 6 inhabitants & part of the purpose of the film is to teach a lesson. What more can a sequel do but throw out that lesson & just turn into a plot about Chris returning & helping what we can assume is a lost-cause Wikus?

Other than that, the whole documentary feeling really helped keep the interest going as everyone re-counted the events in their own opinions & how the movie just pictured such a believable event in history (in terms of aliens visiting earth, not the fact that it's based on a real event). There were no cheesy lines, nobody back stabbing anyone else, nobody portraying a figure you knew wouldn't die from the beginning. It was just, terrific.
 
These the same guys you were referring to when you said this about GI Joe?

No, they weren't. Neither of them have seen it yet. Although I did get a text from one seeing if I wanted to go again tonight. Unfortunately, I'm blown out from work and my allergies. Both Cory and Ben enjoy this stuff, much like myself, but GI: Joe was fun for a different reason. This is where I make a reference to last week's /Filmcast, which discussed the issue at length. Go listen if you haven't yet. Anyway, I have little reason to doubt that they would in fact love D:9, but seeing as they have little to no expectation as to how good or bad it will be, I imagine they'll love it.

EDIT: They saw it without me tonight, and they both loved it. They're a bit younger than me, less-political, and definitely less-nerdy, so it didn't surprise me that they put it in the "weird, but cool" category. I'll have to talk about it more with them lately... Texts don't do a discussion justice.

As for who didn't like it?

My brother and his girlfriend didn't like it. With her, I could have expected it. Shes one of the "fake" nerds that I loathe. The ones that I feel are into it more for nostalgia than anything else. As for my Brother, I was surprised by that. He normally likes most things that I do, but my sneaking suspicion is that he, and his girlfriend "didn't get it" with this movie. The message, the importance, or the overall astounding nature of the film.

Hmmm.



Personally, I wasn't nearly as blown away by it as most people, to put it plainly. While I agree for the most part with the universal acclaim its getting, I'm not about to call it the best movie of the year.* Best action/science fiction movie? Absolutely (although, I haven't seen Moon) Oscar worthy? Most-definitely. This must get a nod for Best Picture, or more importantly, Best Director. Movies like this deserve to do well, and with it absolutely destroying the revenues for GI: Joe on its second week, it was a proper way to end the summer.




*Note: Current "Best Film of the Year" for Brad is 500 Days of Summer
 
Last edited:
Saw it tonight with Kate and I thought it was excellent. It was defiantly a nice departure from the crap that's been coming out, sadly based on the previews it looks like District 9 might have been a fluke with good films.

Without really giving anything away I'll say that I do see the parallels to the Apartheid like Brad pointed out. Also, I'm willing to bet if aliens ever came to Earth this is the way we would treat them.

I can also see where a sequel might be spawned later on down the line to answer some unanswered questions.

I have to ask, i'd be going with the women aswell, How'd Kate like it?
 
Awesome. Awesome.


Awesome.

Twas really that awesome, huh? I am dying to see it, but social norms state that I should see a movie with atleast another friend -all those I can label my buddies are always 'busy'.
:indiff:
 
I have to ask, i'd be going with the women aswell, How'd Kate like it?

She thought it was weird, but still enjoyed it. She wanted to see the Time Traveller's Wife...thank god it wasn't showing when we got to the theatre.
 
No, they weren't. Neither of them have seen it yet. Although I did get a text from one seeing if I wanted to go again tonight.
I am currently using everyone I know that hasn't seen it as an opportunity to see it again.

As for who didn't like it?

My brother and his girlfriend didn't like it. With her, I could have expected it. Shes one of the "fake" nerds that I loathe.
Wait, there are nerd posers? I know there are the "cool" kids from my youth who suddenly talk about comic books and Transformers and crap, like they didn't make fun of me for it then, because it is cool now (and obviously have no clue what they are talking about), but honest to god Nerd posers are new to me.

As for my Brother, I was surprised by that. He normally likes most things that I do, but my sneaking suspicion is that he, and his girlfriend "didn't get it" with this movie. The message, the importance, or the overall astounding nature of the film.
What were they expecting? It is slow to start and I can see how someone looking for a massive explosion fest can be disappointed, but aside from maybe one trailer I never saw anything passing it off like that. I mean, this is Peter Jackson producing it, and if that man knows how to do one thing it is to tell a story and not allow stupid action to get in the way (King Kong vs T-Rex scene being the one exception, but that still had a purpose). But then the majority of the movie going public wouldn't know Peter Jackson from Uwe Boll.

Personally, I wasn't nearly as blown away by it as most people, to put it plainly.
It depends on how you define blown away. Was I absolutely blown away by the epic awesomeness of the action and excitement? No. Was I blown away by a story that actually makes sense, characters I care about, and an overall sense of good film making? Yes.

Can I honestly say that the effect would be the same if it hadn't come at the end of 3 months of pure plot hole ridden, poorly written crap? No.

When I call it best movie of the year it is with full understanding that the competition that I have the ability to see (limited showings never make it here) is very, very crappy and District 9 was able to easily leap past the quality shown in 90% of the movies this year.

*Note: Current "Best Film of the Year" for Brad is 500 Days of Summer
The day I realize that a RomCom (they are all practically the same) is best movie of the year is the day I quit watching movies. There may be good RomComs (I have seen them) but those are just doing the same thing with a touch more creativity than the usual tripe that comes out just to sucker the unwitting female romantics out for a quick cash grab.

I have to ask, i'd be going with the women aswell, How'd Kate like it?
If she is opposed to much blood, even if just for a second then she may not enjoy it. There is bloody violence, but it is not overdone, nor does it linger.


Twas really that awesome, huh? I am dying to see it, but social norms state that I should see a movie with at least another friend -all those I can label my buddies are always 'busy'.
:indiff:
As a former theater employee I can assure you that your social norms and the actuality are very different. I have seen a number of movies by myself when I have been out drinking and don't feel safe driving home, or even when my wife (then girlfriend) was working at her part time job with Pier 1 by the theater. No one laughed at me, no one even noticed.

She wanted to see the Time Traveller's Wife...
The proper response to this request is, "But 'Drag me to Hell' hasn't been in theaters for months."
 

Twas really that awesome, huh? I am dying to see it, but social norms state that I should see a movie with atleast another friend -all those I can label my buddies are always 'busy'.
:indiff:

I'm going to have to tell you that watching a film by yourself is actually way better than watching it with a friend. Friends distract from the story. Sometimes forcing you to miss important parts.

I walked into G.I. Joe by myself and I can say if I didn't I would've missed a good portion of the film.

On another note. I REALLY want to see District 9. I'm broke though, so it'll have to wait.
 
I have to ask, i'd be going with the women aswell, How'd Kate like it?

Yeah I went with my girlfriend as well, and she really liked it. Though she wanted more naked men in it.
 
Just got back from seeing District 9, that was pretty damn good. A lot of unexpected comedy towards the end.
 
Back