District 9

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wardy 944
  • 40 comments
  • 4,281 views
Sorry to break the love chain but... it was awful.

...and not just a little bit awful, but one of the worst movie-going experiences I've ever had - ever. Very few movies have made me want to walk out 30 minutes into it in the theater, but this one did. My wife turned to me at about 30 minutes in and said "we can go anytime". I leaned back and said "if you need to leave, I'm on board". We stayed for the whole show though.

I'll post a more detailed review in the "what movies have you seen recently" thread. But I'll explain my problems with the film.

The plot was good. Not amazing, but it was good. It didn't feel like a retread on a retread (though that's certainly not unheard of). It had a plot hole or two, but nothing too absurd. I was appreciating the gritty realistic sci-fi premise, and the intelligent way it was approached.

The acting was excellent. All of the characters in the movie played their parts absolutely perfectly (though there weren't many of them). And the aliens looked and acted great too.

The music was lacking, but it's because of the documentary style that they filmed the movie in. So I'm willing to forgive that.

So the plot was good, the acting was good, the music is forgiven, the special effects were phenomenal. I'm not even going to complain about any sort of political message. So what on earth made Danoff hate this movie so much?

Backstory

I never go to the theaters. But we were going on our second straight evening without electricity (they're still working on it), and we were bored. We decided to go out to the theaters and see a good movie. District 9 got the nod. This was our first theater-going experience since The Dark Knight, and it was so unbelievably painful that it makes me wonder what on earth (short of another electrical outage) would get me to drop >$20 on going to the theater.

The Punchline

It was the good damned hand-cam that killed this movie. I wanted to scream out in the theater "HOLD THE ******* CAMERA STILL!!!!". I swear, every single scene, no matter how inconsequential, had to wobble all around all over the place. 20 minutes into it I thought I was going to throw up. My wife had one hand on her stomach on the other on her mouth. I had to ask her many times if she was ok to continue. We were reduced to watching the movie out of the corners of our eyes. The shaky-cam absolutely ruined this film.

It was bad in bourne ultimatum. In that film, was irritated because I couldn't see the details of the car chase, or an actors face was annoyingly abstructed while he was talking by some sort of out-of-focus blob as the cameraman did his best impression of a 2-year-old with a video camera. But District 9 took it to a new level (and no, I didn't watch cloverfield). It seemed, at times, as though the movie was intentionally trying to get you to puke. I see puke on the screen, I hear it in the speakers, I see it flung around on the screen, and all the while the camera is swaying around trying to make me dizzy. There were scenes where I stared intently at the screen and literally could not make out what was going on because the camera was moving around too much.

If there were a scene in which we were watching grass grow, the camera would have swayed back and forth. In scenes were we were riding in a car, the camera was bumping around. In scenes where a character was running the camera was practically mounted on his elbows so that we were looking at a rock, and then a cloud, and then a rock again. In really vigorous scenes, scenes were people were fighting, you could follow nothing. There would be a face, and then the sun, and then an object of some sort followed by another blurry face.

If I tied a rope to a camcorder and whirreld it around in all directions in my back yard and sent the footage to Peter Jackson, he could have used it at parts of this and nobody would be able to tell the difference.

Only once in my life have I seen hollywood snatch defeat from the jaws of victory in such dramatic form - the final episode of Battlestar Galactica.

District 9: Good plot, good acting, great special effects, good dialogue, crappy movie.
 
Last edited:
Danoff
It was the good damned hand-cam that killed this movie. I wanted to scream out in the theater "HOLD THE ******* CAMERA STILL!!!!".

My thoughts exactly. I had the worst headache about 20 or so minutes into the movie. 👎
 
The camera didn't bother me and I had three beers before I went.
 
The camera didn't bother me and I had three beers before I went.

Maybe the beer helped. You couldn't tell the difference between the camera's swaying and the room's swaying.

I don't get motion sickness often. I do well on boats at sea, I do well on roller coasters, I do well in the back seat of cars. Every amusement park ride that I've been on that has a motion sickness warning works out fine for me.

That being said, I've gotten queasy playing some videogames where you swivel the camera while moving another direction, and I get queasy reading in the car.

I think it's these later examples that come closest to the camera shenanigans of District 9.
 
Ditto, I had no issues with the camera. And it smoothed out later, I thought, with them moving from the documentary to actual movie format.
 
Ditto, I had no issues with the camera. And it smoothed out later, I thought, with them moving from the documentary to actual movie format.

Barely, but I did notice it getting better toward the end. The preview gave me the impression that the beginning would be a hand-cam format but that it would eventually open up to a movie-style production. This is not really the case. They do move more toward movie-style footage about 8/10ths of the way through the film. But only briefly and not 100%. The camera is still swaying around, just not as much.

I do not understand how you guys can stand this hand-cam crap in the theater. I literally could not look at the screen for significant periods. It was infuriating. "You're shooting footage of someone laying still in grass! Hold the camera steady!" Next time I'll stay home and watch home movies of someone's kid.
 
Just to bring this back up, I have watched this finally, and loved it. My wife on the other hand didn't. Solely because of the final outcome. I would say "Ending" but would preclude a sequel. Which this film deserves, unlike the Chipmunks film.

On a note of inexpensive well done films, check out "Panic Attack". It's production is similar to "405: the Movie". Couple of guys, some good CGI and alot of creativity.



Widescreen link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dadPWhEhVk
 
" Foock You! You Foockin' Prawn!!!! " Lool Are you prawnophobe??? :D

I loved this film. I would compare it to Avatar with less visual bling bling, but with a muchbetter elaborated story.

It really shows how we humans react to something foreign with no knowlegde and how we encounter it when we experience it more
 
The movie was surprisingly good. I always expected that it would at least be entertaining, but it actually went above and beyond that and was good...
 
The movie was surprisingly good. I always expected that it would at least be entertaining, but it actually went above and beyond that and was good...

You should have waited 5 days to comment, it would have been exactly one year gap between comments.



But yeah, this may just be the greatest sci-fi movie I've ever seen.
 
Back