1.05 Satisfaction Poll

  • Thread starter Thread starter LVracerGT
  • 384 comments
  • 21,770 views

Are you satisfied with the 1.05 update?

  • Yes, I'm satisfied

    Votes: 132 17.7%

  • No, I'm not satisfied

    Votes: 497 66.5%

  • I don't care either way

    Votes: 118 15.8%
  • Total voters
    747
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm a bit of both. I like how online settings are easier to delicate eyes. But i was expecting a bit more out of the patch.
 
Multi-monitor support was the feature I most wanted in GT6 and it is now in the game. If PD added nothing more than seasonal events for the next three years, I would be highly satisfied with this game. Period.
 
I voted for not caring. I'm glad they included and fixed what they did, but really that doesn't make the game more appealing to me... At the moment at least.
 
Karts on any track is an automatic 200/10 for me.
 
I voted no because I wanted to see that they matched online physics to offline physics like they did in GT5. I am worthless racing online now, but if I take the identical car with the same setup, it's great.


Jerome
 
1.05 is a very good update and from here i would like to ask PD the following:

keep on fixing bugs as much as you can, the sim would be alot better with less bugs the additional content can wait, why would i care if you add an additional track or track maker or sounds or whatever if we can't have a good sim as a base.

Again 1.05 is maybe THE ONLY sensible update so far it would be highly appreciated if another of it's kind follows shortly.
 
Shlagem
1.05 is a very good update and from here i would like to ask PD the following:

keep on fixing bugs as much as you can, the sim would be alot better with less bugs the additional content can wait, why would i care if you add an additional track or track maker or sounds or whatever if we can't have a good sim as a base.

Again 1.05 is maybe THE ONLY sensible update so far it would be highly appreciated if another of it's kind follows shortly.
Click to expand...
Yes it is my boy! Now you can "Sign-in" instead "Enter" a race.
Ah, you can buy a gangsta Biimer, oooops, a ninja, no you can't!
:lol:
 
Daniel Pinho
Yes it is my boy! Now you can "Sign-in" instead "Enter" a race.
Ah, you can buy a gangsta Biimer, oooops, a ninja, no you can't!
:lol:
Click to expand...

surprised that this comes from someone in brazil! you have a bunch of local who did by far ( and critics would back me with this one) create the best sim out there at the moment (referring to game stock car 2013) go buy that and you would not complain or wait anymore.
 
Now it does matter from where it comes? OMG.
I recommend you to participate a little bit more on GTP threads, you will see how much the dozens of bugs are compromising the game play.
 
I voted no, I'm not really satisfied. The small fixes are nice, but I was hoping for something more substantial, with the Zahara track, new VGT's etc.
The off-road auto-TCS has been fixed, which is fantastic, and karts can go to any road course they like, which is also great.
 
Well 1.05 fixes a lot and adds some cool stuff (love the "Search" function) and I understand it took PD some serious hours of work so I can only say... thanks :)

It's not possible for me to be unsatisfied because I understand that they are working on the clock to fix the game and bring additional content.

What follows cannot be altered or accelerated and thus I have nothing but kinds words for them.

We have to remember that there is Sony in the middle too. GT6 on PS3 or GT6 on PS3 so unfinished is most likely Sony's "fault". Added quotes because I prefer to play GT6 today rather than ..well not playing it and waiting 12 months.

Remember when Kaz wanted more time to finish GT5 ? Sony said no. This is no different.

As everyone - I would like GT6 to be on "spec 2.0" tomorrow but this simply wont happen and by now this shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
 
Last edited:
Didn't expect much. Don't care either way.
 
LVracerGT
Most would argue that GT6 is a half eaten, re-warmed GT5 with sprinkles on top.
Click to expand...

There's no argument, that's what it was always going to be. Major revisions are odd numbered and reskins are even. That makes it MORE infuriating that there are fewer features than GT5. They are already in the engine.
 
BWX
WTF?! They can't even fix glaring bugs like pitstop tire bug and camber bug, and cockpit shadows so dark you cannot see gauges, etc, etc, etc...

Fix your broken ass game PD.

Hell no I'm not happy with crummy update.
Click to expand...
FBS-00340-3.jpg

Take 2 of these :p
 
Honestly it was a pretty good update and it gave us some good things. However, PD is still dropping the ball on content, i.e. Zahara!!!! The lack of Zahara is what angers me about this update because, according to GTPlanet, at the round table discussion the track was first shown at, it was confirmed by reps from Sony and PD for release mid-February, so spare me the never officially confirmed argument for that bit of content.
 
Devil240Z
My summed up thoughts. It was a nice update but We need some content.
Click to expand...

Really, the game already has over 1200 cars and 39 tracks. Is that seriously not enough content? If, on the other hand, by content, you mean additional career and seasonal event races, then I am totally with you. I would like to see them do the GT5 schedule of weekly seasonal events.
 
Swagger897
How do you or anyone else know if that is true? I wouldn't know because I haven't seen anything publicized about it..
Click to expand...

I know and I assure you PERSONALLY ;)

But really - unless specified otherwise all of this:

http://www.gran-turismo.com/us/products/gt6/

and more is to be expected.

They don't need to announce weekly that course creator is being worked on - that's a very silly request if you ask me.
 
Last edited:
PD, you actually surprised me. You fixed and added many useful things which I wouldn't have thought to ask for but like a lot. You fixed a few things I had concerns about. It's clear to me that you are trying to polish stuff up rather than simply give mundane things like cars, tracks, etc. I like it when developers have their own plan instead of wasting time trying to add things that appeal generically to short-sighted gamers: i.e. PD you are obviously running an endurance race instead of a three lap race where all the newbies crash in the first turn. Thank you PD. :D:tup:
 
Voodoovaj
There's no argument, that's what it was always going to be. Major revisions are odd numbered and reskins are even. That makes it MORE infuriating that there are fewer features than GT5. They are already in the engine.
Click to expand...
Well, for the odd/even argument, Gran Turismo 2 and 4 added much, much more content than 6.
 
TurismoBad
I know and I assure you PERSONALLY ;)

But really - unless specified otherwise all of this:

http://www.gran-turismo.com/us/products/gt6/

and more is to be expected.

They don't need to announce weekly that course creator is being worked on - that's a very silly request if you ask me.
Click to expand...
I have heard the same from Kaz about sounds... I know that story. But saying that we don't need to tell you what's going on isn't good at all..

I'm sure if Kaz said something, he too would refer to see the website to our recent progress...

What I want to hear, is their progress of what they have done now, and what they want to have done by this date. What date we can expect things, and what they have found in the game they want to be addressed.

That's all I think everyone wants to know.. Current, future, and their findings..
 
Voodoovaj
There's no argument, that's what it was always going to be. Major revisions are odd numbered and reskins are even. That makes it MORE infuriating that there are fewer features than GT5. They are already in the engine.
Click to expand...

Probably went down for refinement, since you know, many things were hated in GT5 so why not improve?
 
Although they fixed a few things that annoyed me,I voted no.As much as I hate to complain,I was expecting the gps thing(can't remember the name sorry) and possibly the track creator finally BUT to avail as always.So in a nutshell I'm slightly satisfied but not much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Posts

Back