- 5,379
- Yokohama
- F1fan1
That you're criticising people for supporting a driver who would be branded as dangerous in his rookie season while supporting a driver who was branded as dangerous in his rookie season.
Not sure why it needed explaining twice when it was readily apparent from the subtext.
Excuse me? You explained it once. Not twice. And as for Kamui, he was indeed labelled dangerous, incorrectly. He isn't dangerous, actually knows when to back off and isn't on an ego trip.
FamineWho was joking?
I don't like Hamilton all that much (well, you know, I'm British, therefore I absolutely love him), but your constant anti-Hamilton rhetoric is getting quite old and making you look very one-dimensional. Every race we can expect Anghammarad to predict an Alonso win - except, ironically, this one - and you to go on the offensive aganist Hamilton. And then on the offensive against anyone who points it out, whether they're Hamilton fans or not.
Well maybe you weren't joking, but you have no real reason to claim Kobayashi is dangerous. Are you so blind that you never notice the constant barrage of Vettel bashing? I am a Vettel fan, so naturally the complete hatred people seem to have for him on the forums spurs me on. And the day Hamilton deflates his ego and realizes that this isn't "the Lewis Hamilton show" will be the day that I don't need to go on the offensive against Hamilton.
My question to you, is why is it supposedly ok for the constant Vettel hatred, but it's not ok for me to question Hamilton's method's?