- 6,425
- KCCO
From my perspective, those who want change are in the progressive side of things.I'd say both sides are equally afraid of change, as is human nature.
For instance, this years' qualifying at the Daytona 500 was a mess (could've been last years, cant quite remember). NASCAR wanted to test out something done around the rest of the world which is multiple cars on track for qualifying, but failed to understand you cant shove a manhole through the hole it's placed on. They, as usual, clearly forgot to think things through and have the cars start in their pit boxes.
Actually, NASCAR is the only sport that allows this, and it works well for the task at hand. They don't have advanced telemetry systems to accurately determine where a car is on track in proximity to others due to the fact they still have to look at cameras covering the tracks. And on that point, they still fail at it.Those people who are "open minded to change" are the same people who were opposed to NASCAR adding Green White Checkered finishes
I'mor the Chase.
To be fair, the chase is a gimick. There's nothing that was wrong with the last format they had, as it clearly worked previously. Commentators of the sport don't even like it. Remember how confusing it was for even them to understand?Both of which are changes that people who you call "NASCAR progressives" said weren't real racing
Having elimination rounds is worthless if the driver is still on track competing. Otherwise, they still should be eligible to earn points to be champion if they are eligible to race. There is nothing wrong with that format, and there hasn't been for years. Every other motorsport uses that and I don't hear a kerfuffle coming from their fans...
edited...
Last edited: