Doesn't justify it. Especially when Hamilton fans could claim the moral high ground after Austria. And in Austria, the crowd were reportedly misinformed, having been told that Hamilton hit Rosberg, so you could at least understand why they felt that way. Here, it's a pretty callous and deliberate act - like the booing at the start of the week.
I think I saw Nico say either well done or cheers when he and Lewis hit their champagne bottles together but you couldn't hear it
lol we'll see what would happen if Vettel start doing over dangerous move on Hamilton to slow him down while Rosberg cruise ahead to win the wdc.
Of course it is. Different story if they'd been booing a certain other driver.
In other words they can boo Hamilton and it's okay, they respond in kind the next race and it's not.
If that's what I meant, then I would have said it. I have been pretty up-front about my criticisms of Hamilton, even in the face of widespread backlash. Why do you think I would start walking on eggshells now? I just said that you could understand why the crowd in Austria were upset - a courtesy that you cannot extend to the crowd here, because they have no reason to be upset, which other people have pointed out.
You'd be booing the wrong person, then. Bernie had nothing to do with that decision. He's the commercial rights holder, so he oversees the calendar, broadcast deals, trackside sponsorship and the distribution of prize money. The decision to start the race behind the safety car (and when to recall it) was made by race control.
I think it would be Charlie Whiting as he is head of race control
