2016 NASCAR Discussion ThreadNASCAR 

  • Thread starter Thread starter MustangRyan
  • 10,093 comments
  • 427,366 views
Never said Hornish had talent in NASCAR, 0=0
...wat

Looks like another rich kid with no talent has a daddy putting him in a non competitive car

Le me guess, this is yet another reason you'll apply to NASCAR being terrible nevermind the fact that is more or less common practice everywhere.
 
...wat



Le me guess, this is yet another reason you'll apply to NASCAR being terrible nevermind the fact that is more or less common practice everywhere.
Hornish is at an equal talent level to Brian Scott in stock car racing
 
Brian Scott has never put a car in victory lane. He will be a field filler running with Danica and the Jenkins cars, Tommy Baldwins junk and whoever is driving the 23 83 and part time 93
 
Brian Scott has never put a car in victory lane.

L169_CIFRefd16e6776e34318425eddfec5316c33.jpg


Granted I guess it technically was a "truck".

I'm not a fan of Brian, but considering the state of RPM they can't afford a top talent driver, so they might as well get one that brings some money into the team.
 
Danica finished ahead of Hornish in points, so you'd rather have Hornish stay on as a driver and the team become part time like Richard said would happen before Homestead if they couldn't find a driver with a sponsor?
Go look at all the top rides in the Truck series. Everybody is either a vet ala Crafton or Sauter, or they have a rich dad. Unless you are just amazing as a prospect like Larson, you aren't going anywhere in the sport without one.
 
I feel bad for Hornish.
Hornish suffers from Yeleyism in that he's an awesome driver everywhere but Cup. He has shown time and time again that he just can't compete well in Cup cars. Not really a slight aganist him; Ron Hornaday and Mike Skinner are future HOFers who did nothing in Cup as well.
 
He would've had a win at Daytona had he not made that bone headed lane change at the last possible second.
 

Latest Posts

Back