Of course NASCAR decides to keep something I despise. Only place it didn't feel ridiculous was Talladega.
Only place it didn't feel ridiculous was Talladega.[/QUOTEGonna need an explainer here. I came to the conclusion that the stage breaks were awful despite the race being pretty entertaining
I find it funny that NASCAR Holdings is trying to grow IMSA with good races and has done so with great success so far (depending on viewpoint) and stable management while their top level stock car series lost its way with inept management. Brian France and the rest of the staff lost the plot by changing the rules every few years instead of focusing on long term stability. Maybe they need to look (but not touch) at IMSA since they have a clue of how to keep developing a series with the intention of long term success.
Considering NASCAR's management is an old-boys network that also happens to control over half of the tracks that the series goes to and likely only cares about their personal gain over the longevity of the series, I wouldn't expect that to happen anytime soon. It's probably more profitable for them in the short term to simply run the series into the ground and then sell the name off to some investment firm as portfolio filler.
Sadly it's evident that the people that ran NASCAR don't care about the fan base that made the sport what it was.
What has harmed the sport imo is: departure of older famous drivers, terrible TV deals putting races on more expensive tier cable channels (NBCSN/FS1 vs FX/TNT/ESPN), abandoning traditional locations and fanbases for new locations (ex: Rockingham, North Wilkesboro) instead of having both, massive grandstand expansion projects only to demolish some later, 2008 recession, Car of Tomorrow/Gen 5, relatively the same ticket prices since the mid-2000s, and gimmicks like the "playoffs" that try to appeal to younger audiences but only deter older fans and make Nascar look like any other sport.I think most of that fanbase left with a lot of the popular '90s drivers. Granted the litany of mistakes ("exclusive" sponsorships that made securing funding for teams increasingly difficult, over-sanitizing the sport and aggressively discouraging negative opinions, years of inconsistent penalty assignments, emphasizing 1.5 mile ovals because some bean counter said they produce optimal revenue, building new tracks and expanding the schedule when the boom period was clearly ending, failing to help build interest in new talent when they had the chances to do so, and so on) that occurred during and after their retirements certainly haven't helped.
I'm willing to guarantee they have no kind of plan for when Junior retires at the end of this year either, even though it's been the mega-headline of the entire season.
You're not wrong, and those are definitely some of the more forward-facing problems. If we really had to pin it down on anything though, I'd say the most damaging thing is that NASCAR drank their ownWhat has harmed the sport imo is: departure of older famous drivers, terrible TV deals putting races on more expensive tier cable channels (NBCSN/FS1 vs FX/TNT/ESPN), abandoning traditional locations and fanbases for new locations (ex: Rockingham, North Wilkesboro) instead of having both, massive grandstand expansion projects only to demolish some later, 2008 recession, Car of Tomorrow/Gen 5, relatively the same ticket prices since the mid-2000s, and gimmicks like the "playoffs" that try to appeal to younger audiences but only deter older fans and make Nascar look like any other sport.
Facebook likes are a very unreliable and easily manipulated metric, and ratings are down on everything televised because more people are watching things on mobile devices where viewercounts aren't recorded by traditional means.I've mentioned it before but NASCAR popularity is rising in recent months. Since mid February the NASCAR facebook page has been on the rise as referenced earlier in the thread. Since then there have been 415K new likes on fb. Talk all you want about ratings, fan attendance, not liking the stage racing format etc but even with the lower ratings NASCAR is still usually one of the most if not most watched sporting events weekend after weekend. American TV watchers care little about race series that people try to compare NASCAR to like F1, Indy Car and the like. Ratings on all sports are down. NASCAR is doing fine.
I'm also curious why you seem to think declining live attendance isn't important, because that's one of the primary ways track owners make their money and pretty much everyone agrees that it looks really bad when the TV broadcasts show huge swaths of empty seats when there used to be packed houses not a few years prior.
Jr. took 6th and had one of his best finishes this year at a road course off all places.
I'm guessing the amount of time it would take to dry and possible rules that won't allow them to race after a certain hour.WHY TF DID THEY DELAY THE RACE TO TOMORROW?! THE RAIN HAD JUST 🤬 STOPPED!!
What the 🤬🤬 is this word salad trash? Makes ridiculous, poorly thought out anime titles look sane.http://www.espn.com/jayski/cup/2017...onsor-brickyard-400-starring-brantley-gilbert
What a mouthful. Whatever happened to just calling it the Brickyard 400?![]()
darn near turned it off just for that reason aloneAnybody else get the feeling in that skit with Rutledge trying to explain the HORRENDOUS point system to little kids that they're making fun of people pointing that out?Good lord it was cringe.