I don't personally care if it is at the expense of a Super2, the regs are opened up more allowing for better racing in the future more so than what we have and a potential to see less domination of one team, as well as a bigger welcome to manufactures.
As for the losing a V8 for a V6T, you're splitting hairs, you first said they'd be replaced, then went to one step at a time. It's hilarious, the site with the most avid disdain for T8, can't see through the rose tint long enough to realize that the rules may benefit the greater good of the sport by opening up the rules. So I find the Speedcafe poll ironic.
Once again nothing is being replaced, this isn't F1 where V8s aren't allowed, that's the definition of replacement. What you're defining is options, choice, a decision to run a V8, V6t or I4t. No where in there is a statement of "V8s will be replaced with yadda yadda"
It was popular during the long period from the 80s to early 90s when there were multiple manufactures and various engine parings. Group A was a short stint in the grand scheme, and only hated because a single car easily dominated. What I keep seeing is a cultural, emotional knee jerk, not all that different to here. I'm about the reality of things, it is going to happen, it should happen, so once again where is the rational reasoning for why it shouldn't?