Didn't Supercars clarify that Team orders are legal after the Whincup and SVG swap? I'm pretty sure the 12 breached the 5 cars rule and that's all 👍.Charges of DJRTP team orders breach coming up.
Also, Giz saying the #12 has been the sacrificial lamb all year. I think it's been that way since Scott joined the team. Anyway, like T8 haven't done the same things...
Also, Giz saying the #12 has been the sacrificial lamb all year. I think it's been that way since Scott joined the team. Anyway, like T8 haven't done the same things...
I'm pretty sure the 12 breached the 5 cars rule and that's all 👍.
They knew exactly where the incident was. It was code for ''save fuel''The whole radio communication between Fabs and his engineer was strange. Find it hard to believe that the engineer didn't know where the incident was. Don't they have TV's in the DJR garage?Think the drive-thru penalty is probably sufficient enough though.
Yes. I just didn't like how the communication said they didn't know where the safety car was. Say what?Surely everyone can tell they were trying to hold up SVG?
It probably would have been Michael Massi, but I'm not 100% sure on that. It was definitely stated after NZ last year that the rules were changed at the start of 2018 to remove the word 'team'.Didn't Seamer or someone up top, say team orders by T8, was fine to execute?
https://www.speedcafe.com/2018/11/16/supercars-clarifies-team-orders-rule/However, Speedcafe.com has since sought clarification which has resulted in the championship confirming that the rules were amended prior to the start of the season.
The wording of last year’s 24.1.2 rule included the word ‘team’ among the parties that are restricted from giving team orders.
As a result, Triple Eight’s actions at Pukekohe were not in breach of regulations with Supercars confirming that “these parties (in Rule 24.1.2) do not include Teams or Drivers giving or receiving instructions within their own Teams.”
Of course it was... and we all know what would have happened if they hadn't done soSurely everyone can tell they were trying to hold up SVG?
Winning by any means necessary, regardless of whether it's moral or not.It probably would have been Michael Massi, but I'm not 100% sure on that. It was definitely stated after NZ last year that the rules were changed at the start of 2018 to remove the word 'team'.
https://www.speedcafe.com/2018/11/16/supercars-clarifies-team-orders-rule/
Of course it was... and we all know what would have happened if they hadn't done so.
There's far too much win-at-all-cost and gamesmanship at play these days, and not much left of a sporting code.
Happens both sides of the fenceWinning by any means necessary, regardless of whether it's moral or not.
That applies to all of them!... and if they all acted respectfully (yeah rightThere's far too much win-at-all-cost and gamesmanship at play these days, and not much left of a sporting code.
That's what I'm saying...Happens both sides of the fence.
I even mentioned this:
That applies to all of them!... and if they all acted respectfully (yeah right) we wouldn't see this sort of stuff.
Ahhh, no worries.That's what I'm saying...
Kelly switch to Mustangs for 2020 confirmed.
https://www.supercars.com/news/cham...qk7IVI2LKfWuEfRLm1PZQBl8NM4dvfjLW-33-e_R7YjqE
Thus ends the "Not Just a Holden vs. Ford Series" experiment.
The Mercedes wasn't official though. And I think the GT-R is too much for this series. The current car is on it's way out anyway.As someone who doesn't and didn't follow (V8) Supercars closely, I only learned about Nissan and Mercedes having participated from Forza. I don't have warm feelings about the Altima as I had them way too often as rental cars and they are on the same - very high - level of boredom as the Camry (I'm sorry if I hurt someone's feelings), I could much rather see the GT-R adjusted and participate like the Mustang.
On the other hand, just looking at some footage and the Forza model, I can't help thinking that the E class was a perfect fit alongside the Holden and Ford armada. In fact, I think the 5 series should have joined them. If I will win lots of money on the lottery, I'm gonna bring BMW to VASC (of course, I should first buy a lottery ticket)
As a bit of good news for the E63, it did win 2 races(actually won on performance and not gifted/lucky wins). Downside was, Mercedes Australia didn't want the brand to be associated with V8 Supercars(Commodore & FAlcon). However, Mercedes HQ gave Erebus their blessing, along with having HWA build the engines.As someone who doesn't and didn't follow (V8) Supercars closely, I only learned about Nissan and Mercedes having participated from Forza. I don't have warm feelings about the Altima as I had them way too often as rental cars and they are on the same - very high - level of boredom as the Camry (I'm sorry if I hurt someone's feelings), I could much rather see the GT-R adjusted and participate like the Mustang.
On the other hand, just looking at some footage and the Forza model, I can't help thinking that the E class was a perfect fit alongside the Holden and Ford armada. In fact, I think the 5 series should have joined them. If I will win lots of money on the lottery, I'm gonna bring BMW to VASC (of course, I should first buy a lottery ticket)
Has Heimgartner been confirmed at KR for 2020? I don't recall seeing that anywhere.I'm calling it: Heimgartner to be in the top 5 all year next year.
Shame Nissan pulled out and not much, next to nil, was done to help NISMO when they joined.
As a bit of good news for the E63, it did win 2 races(actually won on performance and not gifted/lucky wins). Downside was, Mercedes Australia didn't want the brand to be associated with V8 Supercars(Commodore & FAlcon). However, Mercedes HQ gave Erebus their blessing, along with having HWA build the engines.
Had Mercedes Australia taken the blinders off, I have no doubt Erebus would have made those cars perform much better.
Now, we're back to just Fords and Holdens. I still feel Chrysler should have joined when the 300C was the pace car. It's not too late.
The Mercedes wasn't official though. And I think the GT-R is too much for this series. The current car is on it's way out anyway.
As a bit of good news for the E63, it did win 2 races(actually won on performance and not gifted/lucky wins). Downside was, Mercedes Australia didn't want the brand to be associated with V8 Supercars(Commodore & FAlcon). However, Mercedes HQ gave Erebus their blessing, along with having HWA build the engines.
Had Mercedes Australia taken the blinders off, I have no doubt Erebus would have made those cars perform much better.
Now, we're back to just Fords and Holdens. I still feel Chrysler should have joined when the 300C was the pace car. It's not too late.
Not officially confirmed.Has Heimgartner been confirmed at KR for 2020? I don't recall seeing that anywhere.
Also, I wouldn't assume, if he is at KR, that he'll be a consistent top 5. The team (including Andre) would have to get their heads around a new toy & as we've seen this year, a Ford doesn't guarantee you a top 5. Fabian is a perfect example. He has a copy of the best car in the Championship & yet his results aren't filled with silver 2nd place trophies.
Following the controversy, Supercars has clarified to media that team orders are in fact legal, provided they are given by a team member, as opposed to a third party.
The relevant rules in the Supercars Operations Manual state:
According to Supercars’ clarification, 24.1.1 outlines “the definition of the term ‘Team Orders’, hence use of the word ‘means’ to start the rule”.
24.1.2 is then “the execution of the rule and to whom and how it applies”.
The clarification added: “The specific Parties noted in D24.1.2 cannot instruct any Driver or Team, either verbal or otherwise the effect of which may interfere with a race result.
“These parties do not include Teams or Drivers giving or receiving instructions within their own Teams.”
If that is the case & the interpretation of such, why the hell do they need to have a sit down when they get to the Goldie?I finally found the article that states team orders are legal (and surprise surprise I was right that 24.1.1 is the definition)
Source: https://www.supercars.com/news/championship/supercars-clarifies-team-orders-regulations/
Case closed (maybe)![]()
I have no idea. Team orders have been used so many times previously it's a joke. Yet this is what it's all about?If that is the case & the interpretation of such, why the hell do they need to have a sit down when they get to the Goldie?
It can’t be about Fabian doing his snail impression - he paid for that with a drive-thru. In fact, I was only talking to some guys earlier today about that.
Supercars were so sure he broke a rule, they gave the PLP instead of holding off for a post race investigation.
The whole damn saga is almost too much to bare.
According to their own previous statement D24.1 says team orders are okayRule D24.1 prohibits Team Orders and provides that an instruction to a Driver or Team member, either verbal or otherwise the effect of which may interfere with a race result is a Team Order.
Finally some good news in Supercarland.
https://www.speedcafe.com/2019/10/18/team-18-confirms-purchase-of-second-rec/
I think Todd Hazelwood would be a good fit for this seat. He could learn a lot from Frosty, probably wouldn't be too expensive, is familiar with the ZB, and it keeps a good young bloke going.