CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,260
- United States
https://www.carscoops.com/2020/04/these-2021-nissan-rogue-x-trail-photos-look-pretty-official-to-us/
Low quality official shots:
Low quality official shots:
Soon.Cool.
Meanwhile, I've finished high school, attended community college, acquired a bachelors degree, acquired a masters degree, doubled in age, moved between 3 different states, attended 2 weddings for a single friend, seen 7 Christopher Nolan films in theaters, and played through 11 Forza titles since the Nissan Frontier was last refreshed.
(I actually like the Frontier the way it is...)
Eh, maybe. Hyundai seems to be going in the wrong direction lately.The Koreans are getting much better at this game than Nissan.
The exterior is bland and not particularly bad, but it far from being good too.
This, it really is looks wise a shed load of average. The compact and mid size SUV market is so crowded with interesting choices that I guess this would sell purely on a practicality or reliability angle.
It's decent looking, though it's a mashup of every other compact CUV design.
This basically describes all SUV's.Uninspired
I hear that the Nissan CUVs and Navara trucks sell up a storm in the EU and the UK.
It's definitely peppier than the 2.5L.Yeah nah. I'm not a fan of this future where the ICE car dies out with everything getting a 3 cyl. 1.5 turbo
I don't think I've seen proof of that. The Ford Escape's 3-cylinder gets notably better mileage in the city than the normal 2.0 4-cylinder. We spend plenty of time sitting at traffic lights and loafing through parking lots and drive-throughs in the US and that whole time the 3-cylinder is idling with one fewer cylinder.But in the real world, these downsized triples get bad fuel economy from being in cars way too big for them.
I don't think I've seen proof of that. The Ford Escape's 3-cylinder gets notably better mileage in the city than the normal 2.0 4-cylinder. We spend plenty of time sitting at traffic lights and loafing through parking lots and drive-throughs in the US and that whole time the 3-cylinder is idling with one fewer cylinder.
You're about to hate the rest of your life until EVs become the norm. Let me guess, you don't like those either?I like turbos but not in these applications.
I don't think I've seen proof of that. The Ford Escape's 3-cylinder gets notably better mileage in the city than the normal 2.0 4-cylinder. We spend plenty of time sitting at traffic lights and loafing through parking lots and drive-throughs in the US and that whole time the 3-cylinder is idling with one fewer cylinder.
You're about to hate the rest of your life until EVs become the norm. Let me guess, you don't like those either?
The 1.5 in the Bronco Sport churns out 190 torques and is just as quick as every other base NA 4-cylinder on the market. It's perfectly adequate for what most people are going to do with the car which is trot around town and never do anything strenuous.
I've owned a small 3-cylinder turbo diesel in an Audi A2, weighing slightly less than a tonne and it needed hard work to stay at motorway speed. For British terrain, there's no way in hell a turbo triple will be more economic than a turbo 4 in real world driving. It would have to be worked more, more often.