- 398

- Maitland, NSW
- TRL_beau
I'm the 2J champion that's why lolNo, you're not. 3 with a 2J in front of you. Fastest is currently #37 (Australia) "beau231" with a 3:04,018 (2,667 seconds faster than you).
I'll try see if i can get a 3:03 with the 2J
I'm the 2J champion that's why lolNo, you're not. 3 with a 2J in front of you. Fastest is currently #37 (Australia) "beau231" with a 3:04,018 (2,667 seconds faster than you).
Yep got that one and a heap more, one of my biggest problems is seeing the track. Maybe I should wear binoculars.This is a great tune. dropped to 3.05 almost immediately. Thanks.
have you gone to your quick options and adjust the lightingYep got that one and a heap more, one of my biggest problems is seeing the track. Maybe I should wear binoculars.
It's mainly my eyes, had cataracts treated and now I have kind of 3 levels of vision, up close, computer distance and distance which is good but the tv is kind of in no man's land. But if you like that tune try Wedjim's version, it suits me better.have you gone to your quick op
tions and adjust the lighting
Thank you!Hi everyone... 👍
If anyone is interested, here is my tune for the 905B Evo 1 Bis LM '92.
Oil change. 700pp, 1036BHP, 804kg, 49:51.
65/65
11:42/12:77
1/1
1/1
7/7
0/0
-0.20/0
Brakes 10/10
Trans:
Initial final: 3600
Top speed min. 149mph.
1: 5.775
2: 4.245
3: 3.452
4: 2.840
5: 2.409
6: 2.023
FG: 2.000
LSD: 5/10/10
100% Power. High Turbo.
DF: Max. 600/850
Ballast: 54kg @ 0
I hope it helps a few people out!
![]()
You're fantastic with the 2J, but if I have my wheel and I'm used to it Be afraid. Be very afraid.I'm the 2J champion that's why lol
I'll try see if i can get a 3:03 with the 2J
... Can you testing what time you made with a controller and AT gears with the 2J? Maybe a 3:05? I use traction off in this one. AS on. I wonder what time you make.Take it easyShould read: "Still waiting FOR my beer."
And then again... afor what
No, you're not. 3 with a 2J in front of you. Fastest is currently #37 (Australia) "beau231" with a 3:04,018 (2,667 seconds faster than you).
I don't think that's the only reason! 🤬
i tell you: I'm in the top 250. Why so Mad???
And you can not read well, I say: Am I the only one who drives better with the 2J THAN a other car. I get my fastest times with the 2J here, I'm not saying I'm the fastest with it.....
I wouldn't use the avatar as a reason to ignore someone. That's just nitpicking.I'm sick and tired of your bragging, that's why... and you made #2 on my ignore-list, because I'm also sick and tired of looking at the Picture of Maxi Verstappen (who destroyed yet another Red Bull yesterday on their home turf).
Godd bye and good luck!
Can anyone suggest the most apt tune for the 2J?
I prefer driving this car to the 905.
I wouldn't use the avatar as a reason to ignore someone. That's just nitpicking.
That said, @Kossie isn't lying about his lap times AFAIK, although I couldn't do the time trial in the 2J. I think the real flaw of the 2J, as god-like as it is, is it doesn't have any downforce. There are a lot of bumps on Sarthe that the 2J can't resist if it hits them. I've had many a lap screwed up by the big bump before the first chicane. That just means I have that much more respect for the people who can control a 1,040 HP monster like it around Le Mans.
Really?I think the real flaw of the 2J, as god-like as it is, is it doesn't have any downforce.
http://autoweek.com/article/car-life/week-1970-chaparral-2j-unveiledautoweekVertical fans in the back of the vehicle draw air from underneath, creating suction to the ground, allowing it to produce extreme levels of down force (capable of 2 gs) at low and high speeds.
I haven't seen Kossie bragging. To me, bragging is along the lines of "I'm better than you! I did 'X' thing better, bla bla."1.) I did not ignore Kossie because of his avatar mainly (I ignore Max Verstappen for that).I ignore him for his permanent bragging which I'm too old to take any longer.
2.) You must be right with what you said about the 2J @ Le Mans, because when I drove it in the a-spec-expert-level-historic-racing-car-challenge-mount-panorama-motor-racing-circuit, it worked like a charm there! But I can't drive it @ Le Mans, as much as I like the car and the track!
Yeah, that makes sense. 👍Edit: @S_Bridge I meant wing-induced downforce. I know it has mechanical means of downforce, but it has nothing to push itself to the ground at speed outside of the vacuum.
That's not cruel that's bloody awesome. What's cruel is the more laps I do the harder it gets and the more ways the bloody computer can find to hurl me off the track, no warning just "You're off"Here's one for the near 60's and over. 3.04.1 PO44
Damn the ,1, now will have to go for a 3.03. Racing in AT not comfortable with manual. Would it really make much difference??
3.04.068 that's just cruel. PO42
I'm older than you and Kossie doesn't bother me at all in fact he's quite funny.1.) I did not ignore Kossie because of his avatar mainly (I ignore Max Verstappen for that).I ignore him for his permanent bragging which I'm too old to take any longer.
2.) You must be right with what you said about the 2J @ Le Mans, because when I drove it in the a-spec-expert-level-historic-racing-car-challenge-mount-panorama-motor-racing-circuit, it worked like a charm there! But I can't drive it @ Le Mans, as much as I like the car and the track!
I'm sick and tired of your bragging, that's why... and you made #2 on my ignore-list, because I'm also sick and tired of looking at the Picture of Maxi Verstappen

Partially right, but it was much harder and more frustrating in the event we had some weeks ago on the Nürburgring Nordschleife + GP-Track which measures not quite double the lenght of Le Mans (Le Mans is "only" 13.629 metres while the Nürburgring Nordschleife + GP-Track is 25.359 metres!).This track takes so much time if it goes red and constant restarting feels so unproductive.
Thank you very much for that Tune btw, I used it and I improved from #817 to #552 (whereas I drove the Pescarolo before, but changing for the Peugeot and applying your tune made a big difference, and if I were a bit younger still and would put more courage into the last part between the Porsche Turn and Maison Blanche (which I drive like a coward when I have a good time at hand which I then don't want to lose there due to greed), I guess I could improve my time by 0,5 to maybe 1 second even if I try hard (my current time is 3:09,564).I know the tune I like now on the Puegot and improved it from a 3:18 to a 3:11 after a few attempts. 1 clean lap, done.![]()
I always loved that track and it is one of my favourites besides the Nürburgring Nordschleife, Spa and maybe Monaco.Scary part is I'm starting to like this track now that I know it better. lol
Same here, Done with this TT (both). Great time btwAnd that's that. I don't want to see Sarthe again nor an Evo for a long time.
3.03.771 - PO 36. For the oldies.
I'll post the tune tomorow when i've recovered. Lol.
👍👍Thanks.Same here, Done with this TT (both). Great time btw👍👍
The Nissan R92CP was not a problem either. I still think the GT-One has the most potential of the 3 but to be fair to the Nissan my setup was much less than ideal.
I'm curious what "other" cars are capable of gold in the hands of this old unskilled driver?
After trying this tune I concluded that it was very unstable in the rear ,which some very fast tunes are .But then when I could not get your ballast position and amount to match up with 1036 HP to make 700pp (I needed 60kg at +31 to use 1036 HP) I suspected something might be incorrect .Because you do not mention the actual power I just assumed you use 1036. So I thought could you have made a typo on your ballast position ,so I try +3 on the ballast position, and DING now i can have 54 kg and 1036 HP at 3+ position ,and for me at least, the car feels amazing and is much faster. Curious to see what others think of this theory.L3O time , 3.01.822
Setup, 905
80 79
11,46. 13,80
4 4
4 4
6 7
0,0 0,0
0,20 0,06
Brake 6 8
Lsd. 6 16 6
Gearbox
4000 , 240km
5198
3887
3114
2559
2135
1820
Final. 2,267
Downforce 600/780
Weight of the ballast 54kg
Position of the ballast +31. Rigidity and oil yes
After trying this tune I concluded that it was very unstable in the rear ,which some very fast tunes are .But then when I could not get your ballast position and amount to match up with 1036 HP to make 700pp (I needed 60kg at +31 to use 1036 HP) I suspected something might be incorrect .Because you do not mention the actual power I just assumed you use 1036. So I thought could you have made a typo on your ballast position ,so I try +3 on the ballast position, and DING now i can have 54 kg and 1036 HP at 3+ position ,and for me at least, the car feels amazing and is much faster. Curious to see what others think of this theory.
Here is the setup I used for my 3.03.771. Thanks to beau 231 and mateus paulo for their input, with a few tweaks of my own.
Power 98.6%
Bhp: 1021
Weight: 804kg's
Ballast: 54kgs @ +31%
Suspension:
65/65
12.25/13.81
4/4
4/4
6/7
0.00/0.00
0.30/0.13
Brakes 6/8
Transmission:
Final to 5000
Top Speed 240kph
1. 5941
2. 4335
3. 3499
4. 2870
5. 2378
6. 2023
Final Gear 2050
Drivetrain:
8
16
8
Downforce: 600/840
Works for me, so hope it helps if you want to try it.
finally! 3:13.857. C60, auto, ABS 1. All others off. Man, what a relief. Will switch to manual to try to shave off a second (or two?).