How can they be if they deflect the airflow away from the wheel? The holes in the front either side of the main grill cools the brakes.cudadude2more likly brake cooling ducts
The ducts on each side of the bottom of the bumper are the ducts for the brakes. I would agree that they seem to be some sort of airflap like NASCAR uses to increase the stability of the car when sliding so as to keep it from rolling. However, I would assume that in this case, they're used to increase the downforce on the front end of the car while under heavy braking or turning.cudadude2more likly brake cooling ducts
b
daanThat's an R92cp and I don't know what they're for.
![]()
Moveable aerodynamic devices, such as air brakes, usually aren't allowed in motorsport.
How can they be if they deflect the airflow away from the wheel? The holes in the front either side of the main grill cools the brakes.
I was pointing out how I thought you were wrong. I was not upset. VTGT07 agreed with me. Are you going to give him a very childish response too?cudadude2i thought they were further back on the fwenders,,, sorry to so upset you with my error.
Good. You can start with your spelling.cudadude2I'll endever for perfection from ths day forward
daanThat's an R92cp and I don't know what they're for.
How can they be if they deflect the airflow away from the wheel? The holes in the front either side of the main grill cools the brakes.
I dunno .. it was just a guess. Most the ones that I've seen have them in the back. And since it is a racing car, I would assume they would keep the radiator as close to the engine as possible, but I don't know. It just seems to make sense to me.nickmp0weri think a lot of mid engined cars have the rad in the front. the ultima me and my dad are building does
[SS]AresIs it just me, or is there something weird happening above the frontlights on this nissan?
the backfire indicates that the car is slowing down, so are these things some sort of airbrakes?
daanI was pointing out how I thought you were wrong. I was not upset. VTGT07 agreed with me. Are you going to give him a very childish response too?
Good. You can start with your spelling.
McLaren F1GTRHey, daan, don't Nascars have those as well, but only used in emergencys, right?
jr93altywow. this discussion is amazing. they are not air brakes. they obviously dont move since it was pointed out that its illegal and if they were air brakes then they'd work at every speed. since the velocity is squared in energy equations, u can see how stupid it would be to have these at speeds well above 100mph. this is part of the design of the car to produce a low pressure zone so that high pressure hot air can leave the wheel well. dont call this the dumbest engineering design ever unless youve thought it thru or u were part of the design team. there is no difference in removing heat and applying cooler air. everyone thinks u have to flow cool air over something to be effective but since heat is absolute and coldness doesnt even exist to an "engineer", this design im sure works fine. these cars are designed in wind tunnels, not your uncles garage. air doesnt just disappear, if u remove heat, cooler air comes from somewhere else to replace it. to sum it up, static air brakes would make no since.
AvenixThey are an air break of sorts.... Let me explain.... as of most cars of this calibour , breaks and downforce are most important... (a well tuned engine is a given)
Viewing the picture I have given here (following the red line down the body) , you can see the path the air will take during movement.. accomplishing two purposes
1) after the air exits the front duct , it enters the rear duct and cools the rear breaks. This is important for the lasting time of the breaks as well as the efficiency over a long period ie. 8hour and 24 hour races. maybe not noticible in gran turismo 4 is break wearing... but this is highly noticible in race cars over extended periods.
2) one must notice the angle of the lower of the 2 tear wing, the air moving past and above would cause large downforce gains, and therfor better turning...
sorry for the run on, but this seems to be my take.![]()